ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.01982· 20 results

cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 27, 2026

From Learning Resources to Competencies: LLM-Based Tagging with Evidence and Graph Constraints

Ngoc Luyen Le, Marie-Hélène Abel, Bertrand Laforge

The paper introduces an LLM-based pipeline that tags learning resources with structured competencies, achieving strong performance while providing traceable evidence and leveraging graph constraints.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

MIRA: Mid-training Rubric Anchoring for Source-Aware Data Selection

Haowen Wang, Yaxin Du, Jian Yang, Jiajun Wu +8 more

MIRA proposes a novel source-aware filtering framework that discovers and anchors evaluation rubrics during data selection, significantly improving code-oriented mid-training data quality while reduci…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

Toward Responsible and Epistemically Grounded Multilingual LLMs for Computational Social Science and Humanities

Wajdi Zaghouani

The paper develops a theoretically grounded framework for evaluating multilingual LLMs in Social Sciences and Humanities, moving beyond traditional NLP benchmarks to assess interpretive validity and c…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 28, 2026

SkillBrew: Multi-Objective Curation of Skill Banks for LLM Agents

Wentao Hu, Zhendong Chu, Yiming Zhang, Junda Wu +5 more

The paper introduces SkillBrew, a multi-objective framework that treats skill bank curation as a constrained optimization problem to build efficient and well-curated skill repositories for LLM agents.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

XLGoBench: Detecting cross-lingual skill gaps with algorithmic tasks

Purvam Jain, Preethi Jyothi, Vihari Piratla, Suvrat Raju

The paper introduces XLGoBench, a synthetic benchmark of algorithmic tasks designed to detect persistent cross-lingual skill gaps in large language models.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Beyond Agreement: Scoring Panel-Surfaced Biomedical Entity Candidates for Curator Triage

Shuheng Cao, Ruiqi Chen, Renjie Cao, Zhenhao Zhang +2 more

The paper introduces BioConCal, a supervised scoring mechanism that evaluates biomedical NER candidates surfaced by multiple LLMs, significantly improving the quality of the candidate pool for human c…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Measuring, Localizing, and Ablating Alignment Signatures in LLMs

Aniket Anand, Janvijay Singh, Zhewei Sun, Dilek Hakkani-Tür +1 more

The paper demonstrates that the AI-like style introduced by post-training alignment can be measured, localized, and causally removed using a novel ablation technique called PASTA.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training

Yalun Dai, Yangyu Huang, Tongshen Yang, Yonghan Wang +7 more

This paper proposes four guidelines and two novel data ordering methods (STR and SAW) to systematically optimize data organization, significantly enhancing the stability and performance of LLM trainin…

View →
cs.CLcs.HCRecentMay 29, 2026

Translation Analytics for Freelancers II: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflows

Yuri Balashov, Rex VanHorn, Mingxi Xu, Austin Downes

The paper benchmarks local, offline LLMs for confidential translation workflows, demonstrating that while they are viable for privacy-sensitive use, they generally lag behind top commercial NMT system…

View →
cs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

Scaling Multi-Hop Training Data via Graph-Constrained Path Selection

Pengyu Chen, Yonggang Zhang, Mingming Chen, Jun Song +2 more

The paper proposes a graph-constrained approach to scale multi-hop training data by decoupling path discovery from path verbalization, significantly expanding the usable corpus size for LLMs.

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Who Annotates in NLP? A Large-scale Assessment of Human Annotation Reporting between 2018 and 2025

Maria Kunilovskaya, Gagan Bhatia, Lisa Sophie Albertelli, Yanran Chen +9 more

This paper conducts a large-scale audit of human annotation reporting in NLP, finding that while reporting has improved, critical details needed to assess annotation validity, such as training and agr…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

SkillPager: Query-Adaptive Intra-Skill Navigation via Semantic Node Retrieval

Zicai Cui, Zihan Guo, Weiwen Liu, Weinan Zhang

SkillPager is a novel two-stage framework that efficiently selects minimal, execution-sufficient context from large procedural skill documents by leveraging typed semantic nodes, significantly reducin…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Multi-Legal-Bench, a novel cross-jurisdictional benchmark evaluating LLMs on five standardized legal reasoning tasks across six diverse countries, demonstrating that cross-lingual…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

ImmigrationQA: A Source-Grounded Dataset and Small-Model Adaptation for U.S. Immigration Law

Nazarii Shportun

The authors created ImmigrationQA, a large source-grounded QA dataset for U.S. immigration law, and fine-tuned a small language model (Llama 3.2 3B) on it, achieving a significant performance boost ov…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 3, 2026

Caliper: Probing Lexical Anchors versus Causal Structure in LLMs

Zhenyu Yu, Shuigeng Zhou

This paper evaluates the causal reasoning abilities of large language models and finds that they rely heavily on lexical pattern matching rather than structural reasoning.

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

Leveraging RAG for Training-Free Alignment of LLMs

John T. Halloran

The paper introduces RAG-Pref, a novel, training-free Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) method for preference alignment that significantly improves LLM refusal guardrails against agentic attacks wi…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Mellum2 Technical Report

Marko Kojic, Ivan Bondyrev, Aral de Moor, Joseph Shtok +5 more

Mellum 2 is an open-weight 12B Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model specialized for software engineering, achieving performance competitive with larger models while maintaining the efficiency of a…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Off-the-Shelf LLMs as Process Scorers: Training-Free Alternative to PRMs for Mathematical Reasoning

Atoosa Chegini, Soheil Feizi

The paper introduces Chunk-Level Guided Generation, a training-free method that uses an off-the-shelf large language model (LLM) as a process scorer to guide small model generation, achieving performa…

View →