ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.02465· 20 results

cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Cross-lingual Self-Consistency for Multilingual Reasoning with Language Models

Ahmed Elhady, Eneko Agirre, Mikel Artetxe

The paper proposes an unsupervised Reinforcement Learning approach that enforces cross-lingual self-consistency to significantly enhance the multilingual reasoning capabilities of large language model…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

DenoiseRL: Bootstrapping Reasoning Models to Recover from Noisy Prefixes

Caijun Xu, Changyi Xiao, Zhongyuan Peng, Yixin Cao

DenoiseRL is a novel reinforcement learning framework that improves reasoning in large language models by optimizing directly from the failures and incorrect reasoning traces of weak models, eliminati…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Unlocking Fine-Grained Translation Quality Estimation in LRMs through Synergistically Evolving Implicit and Explicit Reasoning

Renfei Dang, Xinye Wang, Zhejian Lai, Weilu Xu +4 more

The paper proposes RIEQE, a two-stage training framework that synergistically co-evolves implicit and explicit reasoning capabilities in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) to significantly improve fine-gra…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 11, 2026

Learning to Reason by Analogy via Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

Zilin Xiao, Qi Ma, Chun-cheng Jason Chen, Xintao Chen +3 more

This paper proposes a post-training framework called Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RA-RFT) to teach language models to reason by analogy.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Do LLMs Build World Models From Text? A Multilingual Diagnostic of Spatial Reasoning

Zhikai Pan, Chih-Ting Liao, Chunrui Liu, Xi Xiao +4 more

The paper introduces a multilingual benchmark (MentalMap) to test if LLMs build internal spatial world models from text, finding a universal 'L3 reasoning cliff' suggesting that text-only working memo…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

HRBench: Benchmarking and Understanding Thinking-Mode Switch Strategies in Hybrid-Reasoning LLMs

Yansong Ning, Mianpeng Liu, Jingwen Ye, Weidong Zhang +1 more

The paper introduces HRBench, a unified and comprehensive evaluation framework for systematically benchmarking and comparing various thinking-mode switching strategies in hybrid-reasoning LLMs.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

CORE: Contrastive Reflection Enables Rapid Improvements in Reasoning

Linas Nasvytis, Simon Jerome Han, Ben Prystawski, Satchel Grant +2 more

The paper introduces Contrastive Reflection (CORE), a novel non-parametric method that rapidly improves language model reasoning by distilling contrasts between successful and unsuccessful problem att…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

DenseSteer: Steering Small Language Models towards Dense Math Reasoning

Yang Ouyang, Shuhang Lin, Jung-Eun Kim

DenseSteer is a training-free inference-time framework that improves the math reasoning capabilities of small language models by steering their internal representations toward a 'Dense Reasoning' patt…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

Teddy Ferdinan, Bartłomiej Koptyra, Mikołaj Langner, Tomasz Adamczyk +41 more

This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of Reasoning Language Model (RLM) adoption across 28 scientific disciplines, revealing significant disparities in RLM maturity across different scientific…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Unlocking the Working Memory of Large Language Models for Latent Reasoning

Lukas Aichberger, Sepp Hochreiter

The paper introduces Reasoning in Memory (RiM), a latent reasoning method that replaces autoregressive token generation with fixed memory blocks to enable compute-efficient internal working memory for…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LinTree: Improving LLM Reasoning with Explicitly Structured Search Histories

Liwei Kang, Yee Whye Teh, Wee Sun Lee

The paper introduces LinTree, a method that explicitly structures the search history of LLM reasoning traces using parent pointers, significantly improving task performance and search efficiency compa…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

LongTraceRL: Learning Long-Context Reasoning from Search Agent Trajectories with Rubric Rewards

Nianyi Lin, Jiajie Zhang, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li

LongTraceRL addresses long-context reasoning challenges by generating highly challenging training data and introducing a fine-grained rubric reward, significantly improving evidence-grounded reasoning…

View →
cs.AIcs.LORecentMay 28, 2026

Reliable Reasoning with Large Language Models via Preference-Based Maximum Satisfiability

Pedro Orvalho, Marta Kwiatkowska, Guillem Alenyà, Felip Manyà

The paper proposes a hybrid reasoning framework where Large Language Models (LLMs) generate code to encode complex optimization problems into a preference-based Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) format,…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Revealing Algorithmic Deductive Circuits for Logical Reasoning

Phuong Minh Nguyen, Tien Huu Dang, Naoya Inoue

This paper localizes the attention heads within LLMs responsible for specific reasoning steps, finding that specialized heads handle factual retrieval while higher layers manage global information int…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning

Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen

The paper introduces COLAGUARD, a novel guardrail model that efficiently transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space, achieving state-of-the-art safety performance with massiv…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning

Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen

The paper introduces COLAGUARD, a novel guardrail model that efficiently transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space, achieving high safety performance with massive improvemen…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 3, 2026

Caliper: Probing Lexical Anchors versus Causal Structure in LLMs

Zhenyu Yu, Shuigeng Zhou

This paper evaluates the causal reasoning abilities of large language models and finds that they rely heavily on lexical pattern matching rather than structural reasoning.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

Toward Responsible and Epistemically Grounded Multilingual LLMs for Computational Social Science and Humanities

Wajdi Zaghouani

The paper develops a theoretically grounded framework for evaluating multilingual LLMs in Social Sciences and Humanities, moving beyond traditional NLP benchmarks to assess interpretive validity and c…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

AdaptR1: Reinforcement Learning Based Adaptive Interleaved Thinking in Multi-hop Question Answering

Yuxin Wang, Jiahao Lu, Qifeng Wu, Shicheng Fang +4 more

AdaptR1 is a novel Reinforcement Learning framework that adaptively manages reasoning effort at every step of multi-hop Question Answering, significantly reducing unnecessary computational cost withou…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

TRACE: Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements for LLM CoT Evaluation

Yundong Kim, Heyoung Yang

The paper introduces TRACE, a novel metric that evaluates the logical structure of LLM reasoning (CoT) by integrating Toulmin's argumentation theory, demonstrating that sound reasoning structure corre…

View →