ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.03330v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Fingerprinting Inference Systems of Large Language Models

Anna Wimbauer, Jonas Möller, Erik Imgrund, Konrad Rieck

This paper introduces a fingerprinting method that exploits subtle numerical deviations in the inference system components (like the engine or hardware) to reliably identify the specific components us…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 18, 2026

Prompt2Fingerprint: Plug-and-Play LLM Fingerprinting via Text-to-Weight Generation

Sixu Chen, Xiang Chen, Hongyao Yu, Jiaxin Hong +4 more

Prompt2Fingerprint (P2F) introduces a novel, scalable framework that injects unique LLM fingerprints by mapping text descriptions directly to low-rank parameter updates, eliminating the need for resou…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 24, 2026

Security in the Fine-Tuning Lifecycle of Large Language Models: Threats, Defenses,Evaluation, and Future Directions

Wenjuan Li, Yitao Liu, Runze Chen, Rajkumar Buyya

This paper provides a systematic, lifecycle-based framework for analyzing security threats and defenses across the entire fine-tuning process of LLMs, revealing that attack effectiveness is highly mod…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Implicit Identity Technologies for LLMs: Fingerprinting and Watermarking across Datasets, Models, and Generated Content

Bing Liu, Shunping Wang, Yufan Zhu, Xinyi Yu +4 more

This paper introduces 'implicit identity' as a unifying framework to survey and categorize LLM fingerprinting and watermarking techniques for verifying ownership and provenance across datasets, models…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 27, 2026

Efficient and Scalable Provenance Tracking for LLM-Generated Code Snippets

Andrea Gurioli, Davide D'Ascenzo, Federico Pennino, Maurizio Gabbrielli +1 more

The paper introduces a hybrid system, HYBRIDSOURCETRACKER (HST), that combines vector search and Winnowing fingerprinting to achieve scalable, high-precision provenance tracking for code generated by…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 23, 2026

SecureBreak -- A dataset towards safe and secure models

Marco Arazzi, Vignesh Kumar Kembu, Antonino Nocera

The paper introduces SecureBreak, a manually annotated, safety-oriented dataset designed to help detect harmful outputs from large language models (LLMs) that bypass existing security alignments.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 4, 2026

On the Privacy of LLMs: An Ablation Study

Karima Makhlouf, Lamiaa Basyoni, Syed Khaderi, Gabriel Marquez +3 more

This paper conducts a structured ablation study using a unified threat model to evaluate how various system factors (like model architecture and retrieval configuration) influence different types of p…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

Combating Data Laundering in LLM Training

Muxing Li, Zesheng Ye, Sharon Li, Feng Liu

The paper introduces Synthesis Data Reversion (SDR), a method that infers the data laundering transformation used in LLM training and synthesizes queries to restore the detection signals lost when pro…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 30, 2026

How Code Representation Shapes False-Positive Dynamics in Cross-Language LLM Vulnerability Detection

Maofei Chen, Laifu Wang, Yue Qin, Yuan Wang +2 more

The paper demonstrates that using raw source text for fine-tuning LLMs on vulnerability detection causes high false-positive rates by memorizing surface-level syntax, a problem mitigated by using Abst…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Threat Modelling using Domain-Adapted Language Models: Empirical Evaluation and Insights

Saba Pourhanifeh, AbdulAziz AbdulGhaffar, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper empirically evaluates domain-adapted and general-purpose LLMs for structured threat modelling (STRIDE on 5G security), finding that domain adaptation and model size do not guarantee reliable…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 7, 2026

AttnDiff: Attention-based Differential Fingerprinting for Large Language Models

Haobo Zhang, Zhenhua Xu, Junxian Li, Shangfeng Sheng +2 more

AttnDiff introduces a data-efficient white-box framework that extracts intrinsic attention-based fingerprints to verify the provenance and detect unauthorized derivation of large language models (LLMs…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 6, 2026

Mapping the Exploitation Surface: A 10,000-Trial Taxonomy of What Makes LLM Agents Exploit Vulnerabilities

Charafeddine Mouzouni

The paper systematically maps LLM agent vulnerabilities by testing 10,000 prompt variations, finding that 'goal reframing' language is the primary trigger for exploitation, rather than broad adversari…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 4, 2026

A Validated Prompt Bank for Malicious Code Generation: Separating Executable Weapons from Security Knowledge in 1,554 Consensus-Labeled Prompts

Richard J. Young, Gregory D. Moody

The paper introduces a validated, consensus-labeled prompt bank that separates requests for executable malicious code (weapons) from requests for general harmful security knowledge, providing a more g…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

Attesting LLM Pipelines: Enforcing Verifiable Training and Release Claims

Zhuoran Tan, Jeremy Singer, Christos Anagnostopoulos

The paper proposes an attestation-aware promotion gate to mitigate supply-chain risks in LLM pipelines by cryptographically verifying and enforcing claims about training and release artifacts before d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMar 24, 2026

Robust Safety Monitoring of Language Models via Activation Watermarking

Toluwani Aremu, Daniil Ognev, Samuele Poppi, Nils Lukas

This paper addresses the vulnerability of existing LLM safety monitors to adaptive attackers and proposes activation watermarking, a technique that significantly improves detection robustness against…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 14, 2026

Talk is (Not) Cheap: A Taxonomy and Benchmark Coverage Audit for LLM Attacks

Karthik Raghu Iyer, Yazdan Jamshidi, Nicholas Bray, Alexey A. Shvets

The paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy and auditing framework to assess the collective coverage of existing LLM attack benchmarks, revealing significant and systematic gaps in current testing m…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 22, 2026

Breaking Bad: Interpretability-Based Safety Audits of State-of-the-Art LLMs

Krishiv Agarwal, Ramneet Kaur, Colin Samplawski, Manoj Acharya +5 more

The paper conducts an interpretability-driven safety audit of eight state-of-the-art LLMs, demonstrating that while interpretability-based steering is a powerful auditing tool, model robustness varies…

View →