ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.03489v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 1, 2026

SRTJ: Self-Evolving Rule-Driven Training-Free LLM Jailbreaking

Jindong Li, Ying Liu, Yali Fu, Jinjing Zhu +3 more

The paper proposes SRTJ, a Self-Evolving Rule-Driven Training-Free Jailbreak framework that systematically discovers and refines attack strategies using rule composition and feedback to achieve robust…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 8, 2026

SecureForge: Finding and Preventing Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code via Prompt Optimization

Houjun Liu, Lisa Einstein, John Yang, Joachim Baumann +4 more

SecureForge is an automated pipeline that significantly reduces cybersecurity vulnerabilities in LLM-generated code by optimizing system prompts, achieving up to a 48% reduction in output vulnerabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.SERecentMay 28, 2026

Minimal Prompt Perturbations Lead to Code Vulnerabilities: Prompt Fragility and Hidden-State Signals in Coding LLMs

Alexander Sternfeld, Andrei Kucharavy, Ljiljana Dolamic

Minor, single-character perturbations to prompts can significantly degrade the security of code generated by LLMs, suggesting that prompt fragility is a major security concern beyond simple prompt inj…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

Enhancing Reliability in LLM-Based Secure Code Generation

Mohammed F. Kharma, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Ahmed Sabbah, David Mohaisen

The paper introduces the Mitigation-Aware Chain-of-Thought (MA-CoT) framework, which significantly enhances the security reliability of code generated by LLMs across multiple languages and models.

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 4, 2026

SecRL-Prune: Structured Reinforcement Learning-Based Pruning of CodeLLMs for Preserving Adversarial Code Mutation

Parsa Memarzadehsaghezi, Pooria Madani, Khalil El-Khatib

The paper introduces SecRL-Prune, a structured reinforcement learning framework that effectively prunes CodeLLMs while preserving their critical ability to generate adversarial, functionality-preservi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 24, 2026

Security in the Fine-Tuning Lifecycle of Large Language Models: Threats, Defenses,Evaluation, and Future Directions

Wenjuan Li, Yitao Liu, Runze Chen, Rajkumar Buyya

This paper provides a systematic, lifecycle-based framework for analyzing security threats and defenses across the entire fine-tuning process of LLMs, revealing that attack effectiveness is highly mod…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 26, 2026

SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?

Hwiwon Lee, Jiawei Liu, Dongjun Kim, Ziqi Zhang +2 more

The paper introduces SEC-bench Pro, a rigorous benchmark for evaluating LLM-based bug hunting on complex software, finding that even advanced agents struggle with long-horizon security tasks.

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Compile-time Security Analysis and Optimization of Sensitive String Producers

Mike Samuel, Tom Palmer, Shaw Summa, Robert Grayson

The paper proposes a general, compiler-integrated framework for secure content composition that minimizes the syntactic difference between secure and insecure coding practices.

View →
cs.CRcs.CYcs.SERecentApr 15, 2026

Towards Personalizing Secure Programming Education with LLM-Injected Vulnerabilities

Matthew Frazier, Kostadin Damevski

The paper proposes using LLMs to inject personalized security vulnerabilities (CWEs) into students' own code to improve secure programming education, finding that while students found the method engag…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 30, 2026

Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors

Zi Li, Tian Zhou, Wenze Li, Jingyu Hua +2 more

This paper introduces a novel supply-chain attack that uses model code backdoors to actively steal sensitive secrets from local LLM fine-tuning datasets, bypassing current privacy defenses.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 6, 2026

SoK: Robustness in Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks

Feiyue Xu, Hongsheng Hu, Chaoxiang He, Sheng Hang +8 more

This paper introduces Security Cube, a comprehensive, multi-dimensional framework for evaluating LLM robustness against jailbreak attacks, providing a systematic taxonomy and benchmark analysis of exi…

View →
cs.SEcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Improving Small Language Models for Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Verification Feedback

Egor Skopin, Evgeny Kotelnikov

The paper demonstrates that using Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly improves small language models' functional correctness in code generation, particularly when combi…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Security Is Relative: Training-Free Vulnerability Detection via Multi-Agent Behavioral Contract Synthesis

Yongchao Wang, Zhiqiu Huang

The paper introduces Phoenix, a training-free multi-agent framework that detects code vulnerabilities by synthesizing project-specific behavioral contracts, significantly outperforming existing method…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentMar 23, 2026

STRIATUM-CTF: A Protocol-Driven Agentic Framework for General-Purpose CTF Solving

James Hugglestone, Samuel Jacob Chacko, Dawson Stoller, Ryan Schmidt +1 more

The paper introduces STRIATUM-CTF, a modular agentic framework that uses a standardized context protocol to enable LLMs to perform multi-step, stateful reasoning for general-purpose CTF solving, achie…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 17, 2026

Surgical Repair of Insecure Code Generation in LLMs

Gustavo Sandoval, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Siddharth Garg

This paper identifies the 'Format-Reliability Gap'—where LLMs know about code vulnerabilities but generate insecure code anyway—and proposes a localized, per-vulnerability steering vector fix that sig…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 5, 2026

MOSAIC-Bench: Measuring Compositional Vulnerability Induction in Coding Agents

Jonathan Steinberg, Oren Gal

The paper introduces MOSAIC-Bench, a benchmark demonstrating that coding agents can ship exploitable code by complying with seemingly innocuous, staged tasks, a vulnerability that is not easily mitiga…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

LoopTrap: Termination Poisoning Attacks on LLM Agents

Huiyu Xu, Zhibo Wang, Wenhui Zhang, Ziqi Zhu +3 more

The paper introduces LoopTrap, an automated red-teaming framework that demonstrates how malicious prompts can poison the termination judgment of LLM agents, causing unbounded computation.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

From Theory to Practice: Code Generation Using LLMs for CAPEC and CWE Frameworks

Murtuza Shahzad, Joseph Wilson, Ibrahim Al Azher, Hamed Alhoori +1 more

The paper introduces a novel, large-scale dataset of vulnerable code snippets linked to CAPEC and CWE, generated using advanced LLMs, to improve automatic vulnerability detection.

View →