ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.04168v1· 19 results

cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Aligned but Fragile: Enhancing LLM Safety Robustness via Zeroth-Order Optimization

Zhihao Liu, Yifan Wu, Jian Lou, Di Wang +2 more

The paper proposes a novel zeroth-order optimization framework to enhance the robustness of LLM safety alignment, showing that few refinement steps can significantly improve safety while maintaining u…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 7, 2026

Safety Anchor: Defending Harmful Fine-tuning via Geometric Bottlenecks

Guoxin Lu, Letian Sha, Qing Wang, Peijie Sun +3 more

The paper introduces Safety Bottleneck Regularization (SBR), a novel defense mechanism that anchors LLM safety by constraining the unembedding layer, effectively preventing harmful fine-tuning (HFT) e…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 2, 2026

Understanding the Effects of Safety Unalignment on Large Language Models

John T. Halloran

This study compares two methods of safety unalignment (Jailbreak-Tuning and Weight Orthogonalization) across six LLMs and finds that Weight Orthogonalization (WO) significantly enhances malicious capa…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

SafeSteer: Localized On-Policy Distillation for Efficient Safety Alignment

Hao Li, Jingkun An, Zijun Song, Pengyu Zhu +7 more

SafeSteer proposes a localized on-policy distillation method that restricts safety alignment to specific safety tokens, thereby achieving strong safety performance with minimal degradation to general…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 9, 2026

The Art of (Mis)alignment: How Fine-Tuning Methods Effectively Misalign and Realign LLMs in Post-Training

Rui Zhang, Hongwei Li, Yun Shen, Xinyue Shen +5 more

The paper investigates how various fine-tuning methods can be used both to intentionally misalign and subsequently realign large language models (LLMs), revealing distinct strengths for attack and def…

View →
cs.CYcs.CRcs.HCRecentMar 25, 2026

Learning from Mistakes: Can LLM Self-Recover after Misalignment?

Olga E. Sorokoletova, Francesco Giarrusso, Vincenzo Suriani, Daniele Nardi

This paper shifts the focus of LLM safety from preventing misalignment to investigating the model's intrinsic ability to self-recover its alignment after being corrupted by adversarial inputs.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

You Snooze, You Lose: Automatic Safety Alignment Restoration through Neural Weight Translation

Marco Arazzi, Vignesh Kumar Kembu, Antonino Nocera, Stjepan Picek +1 more

The paper introduces NeWTral, a framework that restores safety alignment to specialized LLM adapters without sacrificing their domain-specific knowledge, achieving a significant reduction in attack su…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CERecentMay 3, 2026

RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs

Sadia Asif, Mohammad Mohammadi Amiri

The paper introduces RefusalGuard, a novel fine-tuning framework that preserves the geometric structure of safety-relevant representations in LLMs, thereby mitigating the degradation of refusal behavi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 23, 2026

SecureBreak -- A dataset towards safe and secure models

Marco Arazzi, Vignesh Kumar Kembu, Antonino Nocera

The paper introduces SecureBreak, a manually annotated, safety-oriented dataset designed to help detect harmful outputs from large language models (LLMs) that bypass existing security alignments.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 9, 2026

Towards Identification and Intervention of Safety-Critical Parameters in Large Language Models

Weiwei Qi, Zefeng Wu, Tianhang Zheng, Zikang Zhang +3 more

The paper proposes the Expected Safety Impact (ESI) framework to identify safety-critical parameters in LLMs, introducing targeted tuning methods (SET and SPA) to enhance safety and preserve alignment…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 21, 2026

Involuntary In-Context Learning: Exploiting Few-Shot Pattern Completion to Bypass Safety Alignment in GPT-5.4

Alex Polyakov, Daniel Kuznetsov

The paper introduces Involuntary In-Context Learning (IICL), an effective few-shot pattern completion attack that can bypass safety alignments in large language models, achieving a 24.0% bypass rate a…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

SPARD: Defending Harmful Fine-Tuning Attack via Safety Projection with Relevance-Diversity Data Selection

Shuhao Chen, Weisen Jiang, Yeqi Gong, Shengda Luo +4 more

SPARD is a defense framework that uses Safety-Projected Alternating optimization and Relevance-Diversity data selection to protect large language models from harmful fine-tuning attacks, achieving sup…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

SPARD: Defending Harmful Fine-Tuning Attack via Safety Projection with Relevance-Diversity Data Selection

Shuhao Chen, Weisen Jiang, Yeqi Gong, Shengda Luo +4 more

SPARD is a defense framework that uses Safety-Projected Alternating optimization and Relevance-Diversity data selection to mitigate harmful fine-tuning attacks that undermine LLM safety.

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

Leveraging RAG for Training-Free Alignment of LLMs

John T. Halloran

The paper introduces RAG-Pref, a novel, training-free Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) method for preference alignment that significantly improves LLM refusal guardrails against agentic attacks wi…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

Safety Geometry Collapse in Multimodal LLMs and Adaptive Drift Correction

Jiahe Guo, Xiangran Guo, Jiaxuan Chen, Weixiang Zhao +5 more

This paper introduces the concept of Safety Geometry Collapse, demonstrating that multimodal inputs degrade the safety separation of LLMs, and proposes ReGap, a training-free method that adaptively co…

View →
cs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety

Samee Arif, Naihao Deng, Zhijing Jin, Rada Mihalcea

The paper introduces Incremental Completion Decomposition (ICD), a novel jailbreak strategy that successfully bypasses LLM safety mechanisms by eliciting malicious content through a sequence of single…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 21, 2026

Sensitivity Uncertainty Alignment in Large Language Models

Prakul Sunil Hiremath, Harshit R. Hiremath

The paper proposes Sensitivity-Uncertainty Alignment (SUA), a framework that measures the misalignment between a model's prediction instability and its stated uncertainty to improve model reliability.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

ARES: Adaptive Red-Teaming and End-to-End Repair of Policy-Reward System

Jiacheng Liang, Yao Ma, Tharindu Kumarage, Satyapriya Krishna +4 more

ARES is a novel framework that systematically discovers and mitigates dual vulnerabilities in RLHF systems by simultaneously testing the core LLM and its Reward Model (RM) using structured adversarial…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

CSULoRA: Closest Safe Update Low-Rank Adaptation

Oleksandr Marchenko Breneur, Adelaide Danilov, Aria Nourbakhsh, Salima Lamsiyah

CSULoRA is a post-hoc method that corrects trained LoRA adapters by estimating a safety-aligned subspace and solving a penalized minimum-change problem to attenuate unsafe update directions while pres…

View →