ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “Answer Grounding”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.CLcs.IREmpiricalRecentJul 15, 2026

DS@GT ARC at LongEval: Citation Integrity and Factual Grounding in Scientific QA

Brandon Michaels, Brendon Johnson

DS@GT ARC evaluates the effectiveness of Corrective RAG (CRAG) and CiteFix in improving citation faithfulness and answer grounding in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) QA systems, revealing a trade…

View →
cs.AIcs.IRcs.LGEmpiricalRecentJul 16, 2026

SAGA: Schema-Aware Grounding for Agentic Text-to-SPARQL Generation

Yiming Zhang, Koji Tsuda

The paper proposes SAGA, a framework for schema-aware grounding in agentic text-to-SPARQL generation, which maintains a persistent type state, filters incompatible property candidates, and handles mis…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Connecting the Dots: Benchmarking Reflective Memory in Long-Horizon Dialogue

Jingjie Lin, Bingbing Wang, Zihan Wang, Zhengda Jin +3 more

The paper introduces RefMem-Bench, a new benchmark for measuring reflective memory in long-horizon dialogue, and proposes REMIND, a framework that significantly improves models' ability to synthesize…

View →
cs.CVEmpiricalRecentJul 17, 2026

Searching Videos as Trees: Self-Correcting Agents for Grounded Long Video QA

Ce Zhang, Ziyang Wang, Yulu Pan, Oluwatumininu Oguntola +5 more

This paper proposes VideoTreeSearch (VTS), a framework for grounded long-video question answering that uses iterative self-correcting search over an adaptive temporal tree.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

AdaptR1: Reinforcement Learning Based Adaptive Interleaved Thinking in Multi-hop Question Answering

Yuxin Wang, Jiahao Lu, Qifeng Wu, Shicheng Fang +4 more

AdaptR1 is a novel Reinforcement Learning framework that adaptively manages reasoning effort at every step of multi-hop Question Answering, significantly reducing unnecessary computational cost withou…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

SSR3D-LLM: Structured Spatial Reasoning via Latent Steps for Fine-Grained Grounding in Unified 3D-LLMs

Jiawei Li, Ziyi Liu, Weijie Shi, Long Chen +2 more

SSR3D-LLM introduces a structured spatial reasoning interface for unified 3D-LLMs, allowing fine-grained object grounding by generating and processing sequential latent spatial steps.

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Pause and Think: A Dataset and Benchmark for Video-Grounded Assistive Action Suggestion

Shivam Singh, Saptarshi Majumdar, Pratik Prabhanjan, Zicheng Liu +1 more

The paper introduces pause-and-think-T, a reasoning-centric dataset and benchmark that enables compact Vision-Language Models to perform visually grounded, context-aware action suggestion, matching la…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Teaching Language Models to Check Grounded Claim Factuality with Human Test-Taking Strategies

Yuxuan Ye, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Edwin Simpson

The paper proposes a novel, efficient method for checking the factuality of claims generated by LLMs by framing it as a true/false reading comprehension task and incorporating explicit test-taking str…

View →
cs.AITheoreticalRecentJul 3, 2026

Applying Answer Set Programming with Fuzzy Membership Functions: a Case Study

Luca Ferragina, Ilenia Galati, Lorena Gullone, Francesco Scarcello

This paper introduces a fuzzy-logic-based qualitative extension of Answer Set Programming (ASP) to integrate numerical information and qualitative reasoning.

View →
cs.AIcs.CYq-fin.RMRecentMay 27, 2026

The Ethics of LLM Sandbox and Persona Dynamics

Tim Gebbie, Stewart Gebbie

The paper argues that LLM guardrails and persona dynamics create an unethical 'reality gap' by laundering epistemic risk onto users, advocating for task-level causal requirements over response-level m…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

The Chain Holds, the Answer Folds: Trace-Answer Dissociation in Reasoning Models Under Adversarial Pressure

Yubo Li, Ramayya Krishnan, Rema Padman

The paper identifies a failure mode called unfaithful capitulation (UC), where reasoning models maintain a correct internal thought process (chain-of-thought) but output an incorrect final answer when…

View →
cs.CLEmpiricalRecentJun 30, 2026

DigitalCoach: Communication and Grounding Gaps in Human and Agentic Computer Use Coaching

Meng Chen, Anya Ji, Tsung-Han Wu, Tobias Maringgele +3 more

The paper introduces DigitalCoach, a dataset of human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions, and evaluates the ability of state-of-the-art models to teach humans how to use computers.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

An Enigma of Artificial Reason: Investigating the Production-Evaluation Gap in Large Reasoning Models

Mingzhong Sun, Teresa Yeo, Armando Solar-Lezama, Tan Zhi-Xuan

This paper investigates the production-evaluation gap in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that while LRMs excel at generating solutions, they struggle significantly to evaluate flawed reasoning,…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

A Primer in Post-Training Reasoning Data: What We Know About How It Works

Yaoming Li, Guangxiang Zhao, Qilong Shi, Lin Sun +2 more

This paper synthesizes over 150 scattered studies and reports to provide the first comprehensive primer on post-training reasoning data, organizing the field around data objects, utility, construction…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Diagnosing Harmful Continuation in Answer-Correct Long-CoT Training Traces

Chen He, Yuhao Wu, Lei Wang, Wenxuan Zhang +1 more

The paper identifies and demonstrates that post-conclusion continuation in answer-correct long-CoT traces is harmful during LLM fine-tuning, proposing a method to cut this continuation.

View →