ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “Reasoning by analogy”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.CLcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 11, 2026

Learning to Reason by Analogy via Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

Zilin Xiao, Qi Ma, Chun-cheng Jason Chen, Xintao Chen +3 more

This paper proposes a post-training framework called Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RA-RFT) to teach language models to reason by analogy.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

A Primer in Post-Training Reasoning Data: What We Know About How It Works

Yaoming Li, Guangxiang Zhao, Qilong Shi, Lin Sun +2 more

This paper synthesizes over 150 scattered studies and reports to provide the first comprehensive primer on post-training reasoning data, organizing the field around data objects, utility, construction…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Reasoning with Sampling: Cutting at Decision Points

Felix Zhou, Anay Mehrotra, Quanquan C. Liu

The paper introduces Entropy-Cut Metropolis-Hastings, an efficient sampling method that uses next-token entropy to identify and resample from critical decision points in a reasoning trace, significant…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

GraphARC: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph-Based Abstract Reasoning

Saku Peltonen, August Bøgh Rønberg, Andreas Plesner, Roger Wattenhofer

The paper introduces GraphARC, a new benchmark for abstract reasoning on graph-structured data, demonstrating that current state-of-the-art language models struggle with full graph transformation task…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

CORE: Contrastive Reflection Enables Rapid Improvements in Reasoning

Linas Nasvytis, Simon Jerome Han, Ben Prystawski, Satchel Grant +2 more

The paper introduces Contrastive Reflection (CORE), a novel non-parametric method that rapidly improves language model reasoning by distilling contrasts between successful and unsuccessful problem att…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

DenseSteer: Steering Small Language Models towards Dense Math Reasoning

Yang Ouyang, Shuhang Lin, Jung-Eun Kim

DenseSteer is a training-free inference-time framework that improves the math reasoning capabilities of small language models by steering their internal representations toward a 'Dense Reasoning' patt…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 27, 2026

Tree of Thoughts as a Classical Heuristic Search Problem: Formal Foundations and Design Patterns

Guni Sharon

This paper unifies the fragmented field of Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT) reasoning by mapping LLM-based search processes onto a formal taxonomy derived from classical heuristic search theory.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LORecentMay 27, 2026

Satisfiability Solving with LLMs: A Matched-Pair Evaluation of Reasoning Capability

Leizhen Zhang, Shuhan Chen, Sheng Chen

The paper evaluates LLM reasoning on Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, concluding that conventional metrics are misleading and proposing a paired-formula protocol with Accurate Differentiation Ra…

View →
cs.AIcs.LORecentMay 29, 2026

Answer-Set-Programming-based Abstractions for Reinforcement Learning

Rafael Bankosegger, Thomas Eiter, Johannes Oetsch

This paper proposes using Answer-Set Programming (ASP) to implement and evaluate CARCASS abstractions, demonstrating a promising method for constructing powerful abstractions for Reinforcement Learnin…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Thinking Economically: A Hierarchical Framework for Adaptive-Complexity Reasoning in LLMs

Yubo Gao, Haotian Wu, Hong Chen, Junquan Huang +7 more

The paper introduces Hierarchical Adaptive Budgeter (HAB), a framework that improves LLM reasoning efficiency by adaptively allocating computational resources to match the intrinsic complexity of both…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

eMoT: evolving Memory-of-Thought via Symbolic Anchoring and Memory Corrosion

Xiang Li, Jiwei Wei, Ke Liu, Yitong Qin +4 more

The eMoT framework enhances multi-step reasoning in LLMs by treating reasoning as an evolving memory, stabilizing performance through symbolic computation and structured refinement.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

An Enigma of Artificial Reason: Investigating the Production-Evaluation Gap in Large Reasoning Models

Mingzhong Sun, Teresa Yeo, Armando Solar-Lezama, Tan Zhi-Xuan

This paper investigates the production-evaluation gap in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that while LRMs excel at generating solutions, they struggle significantly to evaluate flawed reasoning,…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

TRACE: Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements for LLM CoT Evaluation

Yundong Kim, Heyoung Yang

The paper introduces TRACE, a novel metric that evaluates the logical structure of LLM reasoning (CoT) by integrating Toulmin's argumentation theory, demonstrating that sound reasoning structure corre…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Revealing Algorithmic Deductive Circuits for Logical Reasoning

Phuong Minh Nguyen, Tien Huu Dang, Naoya Inoue

This paper localizes the attention heads within LLMs responsible for specific reasoning steps, finding that specialized heads handle factual retrieval while higher layers manage global information int…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

ReasonOps: Operator Segmentation for LLM Reasoning Traces

Daniel Lee, Owen Queen, James Zou

ReasonOps introduces an unsupervised method to segment and analyze the common, compositional structure of LLM reasoning traces, discovering universal reasoning operators that predict model identity an…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Not All Explanations Simulate Equally: Comparing Verbalized Feature Attributions and Self-Generated Rationales

Pingjun Hong, Benjamin Roth

The paper compares verbalized feature attributions and self-generated rationales for explaining model behavior, finding that the format and granularity of the explanation significantly affect its abil…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Doing What They Say, Not What They Reason: Locating the Faithfulness Gap in LLM Agents

Yufeng Wang

This paper investigates the 'faithfulness gap' in LLM agents—the discrepancy between stated reasoning and actual action—by decomposing it into two opposing steps: reasoning-to-conclusion and conclusio…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

HRBench: Benchmarking and Understanding Thinking-Mode Switch Strategies in Hybrid-Reasoning LLMs

Yansong Ning, Mianpeng Liu, Jingwen Ye, Weidong Zhang +1 more

The paper introduces HRBench, a unified and comprehensive evaluation framework for systematically benchmarking and comparing various thinking-mode switching strategies in hybrid-reasoning LLMs.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Learning When to Translate for Multilingual Reasoning

Deokhyung Kang, Hyounghun Kim, Gary Geunbae Lee

The paper proposes Luar, a framework that trains reasoning language models to selectively use English translation only when their direct understanding of a non-English input is unreliable, significant…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 27, 2026

Zipping the Thought: When and How Compressed Reasoning Data Works in LLM Post-Training

Kohsei Matsutani, Gouki Minegishi, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa +1 more

This paper investigates how different types of compressed reasoning data (Explicit, Composed, Implicit CoT) affect LLM performance during post-training, finding that the choice of compression and subs…

View →