ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “Trustworthiness levels”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.CYcs.AIeess.SYTheoreticalRecentJul 17, 2026

A Methodology for Auditable Trustworthiness Levels in AI Lifecycle Governance

Andrea Ferrario

The paper proposes a methodology for auditable trustworthiness levels in AI governance with a formal framework and a lightweight procedure.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

Leveraging Large Language Models for Trustworthiness Assessment of Web Applications

Oleksandr Yarotskyi, José D'Abruzzo Pereira, João R. Campos

This paper proposes an empirical methodology to automate web application trustworthiness assessment by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to verify adherence to secure coding practices, showing t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentMay 1, 2026

Skills as Verifiable Artifacts: A Trust Schema and a Biconditional Correctness Criterion for Human-in-the-Loop Agent Runtimes

Alfredo Metere

The paper proposes a trust schema and verification framework to ensure that agent skills, which augment LLMs, are rigorously verified before deployment, thereby making human-in-the-loop oversight scal…

View →
cs.AIcs.MAeess.SYSurveyRecentJul 20, 2026

Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems

Omar Al-Refai, Ibrahim Shahbaz, Adam Ali Husseinat, Michael Mandulak +2 more

This paper surveys the trustworthiness of agentic AI systems in engineering domains, organizing it around five dimensions: safety, robustness, transparency, accountability, and privacy.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 17, 2026

Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security

Jinhu Qi, Muzhi Li, Jiahong Liu, Yuqin Shu +8 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, practical guide to ensuring the trustworthiness of complex, autonomous agentic AI systems by focusing on safety, robustness, privacy, and system security.

View →
cs.LGcs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Trust Functions: Near-Lossless Weak-to-Strong Generalization by Learning When to Trust the Weak Teacher

Arda Uzunoglu, Alvin Zhang, Daniel Khashabi

The paper introduces trust functions to filter weak supervision labels, enabling near-lossless weak-to-strong generalization by selectively training a strong student using only the most reliable weak…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Models

Areeb Gani, Asal Meskin, Gabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Arman Cohan

The paper introduces a novel framework to quantify faithful confidence expression (FC) in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that FC remains a significant and challenging reliability target for th…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 21, 2026

Measuring Security Without Fooling Ourselves: Why Benchmarking Agents Is Hard

Sahar Abdelnabi, Chris Hicks, Konrad Rieck, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi

This paper identifies three core weaknesses—benchmark vulnerabilities, temporal staleness, and runtime uncertainty—that undermine current AI agent security evaluations and proposes directions for buil…

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJul 16, 2026

Can We Trust Item Response Theory for AI Evaluation?

Han Jiang, Sunbeom Kwon, Jinwen Luo, Ziang Xiao +1 more

This paper evaluates the reliability of using item response theory (IRT) models for AI benchmarking, comparing four estimation tools under various simulation conditions.

View →
cs.HCcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

The Decision to Verify: How Warmth and User Characteristics Shape Reliance on Conversational Agents for Information Search

Mert Yazan, Frederik Bungaran Ishak Situmeang, Suzan Verberne

Despite having access to web search, users' reliance on conversational AI for information remains high, driven primarily by pre-existing trust and influenced indirectly by the chatbot's conversational…

View →
eess.AScs.AIcs.HCRecentMay 27, 2026

I Hear, Therefore I Trust: A Socio-Technical Investigation of Humans as Synthetic Speech Detectors

Lelia Erscoi, Tomi Kinnunen

This study investigates how humans detect synthetic speech in real-world contexts, finding that while overt detection failed for fully synthetic speech, participants still implicitly discriminated utt…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 20, 2026

An Evidence-driven Protocol for Trustworthy CI Pipelines

Fernando Castillo, Eduardo Brito, Pille Pullonen-Raudvere, Sebastian Werner +1 more

The paper proposes an evidence-driven protocol combining Deterministic Build Systems and Trusted Execution Environments to provide cryptographically verifiable guarantees of software artifact integrit…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.HCRecentMay 27, 2026

AI, Take the Wheel: What Drives Delegation and Trust in Human-Computer Cooperative Question Answering?

Maharshi Gor, Yoo Yeon Sung, Yu Hou, Eve Fleisig +3 more

This study investigates human-AI collaboration in question answering, finding that while collaboration is beneficial, humans make suboptimal decisions by both under-relying on correct AI suggestions a…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 12, 2026

SkillSafetyBench: Evaluating Agent Safety under Skill-Facing Attack Surfaces

Chang Jin, An Wang, Zeming Wei, Kai Wang +6 more

The paper introduces SkillSafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark demonstrating that agent safety failures often stem from adversarial influences within reusable skills and execution environments, rath…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

Same Payload, Different Channel: Measuring Trust Asymmetry in Tool-Using Language Models

Mohammed Sameer Syed, Rozhin Yasaei

The paper introduces the Safety Asymmetry Score (SAS) to measure how a model's vulnerability to adversarial content changes based on whether the malicious input arrives via the user message, tool meta…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

Same Payload, Different Channel: Measuring Trust Asymmetry in Tool-Using Language Models

Mohammed Sameer Syed, Rozhin Yasaei

The paper introduces the Safety Asymmetry Score (SAS) to measure how a model's susceptibility to adversarial attacks changes based on whether the malicious content arrives via the user message, tool m…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

Security Barriers to Trustworthy AI-Driven Cyber Threat Intelligence in Finance: Evidence from Practitioners

Emir Karaosman, Advije Rizvani, Irdin Pekaric

This paper investigates the practical barriers preventing the trustworthy deployment of AI-driven Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) in the highly regulated financial sector, identifying four key socio-t…

View →