ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “scholarly information systems”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.IRstat.APEmpiricalRecentJun 26, 2026

An LLM-Powered Semantic Alignment Framework for Journal Recommendation

Yanglin Yan, Zicheng Xie, Tianchen Gao, Rui Pan +1 more

This paper proposes a semantic alignment framework for journal recommendation using large language models, achieving high accuracies and interpretable reasoning.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

AI for Monitoring and Classifying Data Used in Research Literature

Rafael Macalaba, Aivin V. Solatorio

The paper introduces a novel, scalable framework to monitor and classify dataset usage within research literature, addressing the current lack of infrastructure for tracking data citations.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Extending AI for Research to the Humanities: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evidence-Grounded Scholarship

Yating Pan, Jiajun Zhang, Jun Wang, Qi Su

The paper introduces SPIRE, a multi-agent framework designed to extend LLM research capabilities to the humanities by enabling evidence-grounded interpretive reasoning over primary sources.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

Hidden Secrets in the arXiv: Discovering, Analyzing, and Preventing Unintentional Information Disclosure in Source Files of Scientific Preprints

Jan Pennekamp, Johannes Lohmöller, David Schütte, Joscha Loos +1 more

This paper systematically analyzes 2.7 million arXiv submissions to demonstrate that nearly every preprint unintentionally discloses sensitive or unnecessary information through its source files, prop…

View →
cs.DLcs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Digging Up Citations: FOSSIL, a Dataset and Workflow for Reference Extraction in Law and the Humanities

Luca Foppiano, Christian Boulanger

The paper introduces FOSSIL, a new multilingual dataset and specialized workflow designed to significantly improve the extraction of citations embedded within complex footnotes common in law and human…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Reading Between the Citations: A Typed Claim Network for Scientific Literature

Ning Ding, Sergio J. Rodríguez Méndez, Pouya G. Omran

The paper introduces a typed claim network that models cross-document references by explicitly labeling the stance (e.g., agreement, disagreement) of a citation, significantly improving downstream tas…

View →
cs.IRcs.HCEmpiricalRecentJul 3, 2026

AI Overviews in Academic Search: Evaluating AI-generated Summaries of Search Results in a Domain-specific Search Engine

Kevin Schott, Kanishka Silva, Ingo Frommholz, Philipp Mayr +2 more

This paper evaluates the use of AI-generated summaries on search engine results pages (SERPs) in academic search for social science information.

View →
cs.DLcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Verified Misguidance: Measuring Structural Citation Failures in Search-Augmented LLMs

Yongsik Seo, Wooseok Jeong, Eunyoung Kim, Hyeonseo Jang +1 more

The paper introduces CITETRACE, a large-scale dataset and evaluation framework that systematically measures structural citation failures in search-augmented LLMs, revealing a pattern called Verified M…

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 30, 2026

FARS: A Fully Automated Research System Deployed at Scale

Qiong Tang, Xiangkun Hu, Xiangyang Liu, Yiran Chen +1 more

FARS is a fully automated AI-for-AI research system that generated and advanced 166 complete research papers across 67 topics in a large-scale public deployment, with evaluations from 282 reviews.

View →
cs.IREmpiricalRecentJul 17, 2026

Scientific Claim-Source Retrieval Revisited: A Comparative Study of Style Transfer and Re-Ranking

Tobias Schreieder, Harsh Khandelwal, Yu-Ling Zhong, Michael Färber

This paper compares sparse and dense retrieval models for scientific claim-source retrieval on the CheckThat! 2026 benchmark. Translating claims into English and incorporating publication metadata imp…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLEmpiricalRecentJul 2, 2026

Evaluating Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Academic Texts

Valentin J. J. Kreileder, Johannes Reisinger, Andreas Fischer

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of cluster-based semantic chunking compared to fixed-size and recursive chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems using the Retrieval Augmented Generati…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.MARecentJun 1, 2026

TechGraphRAG: An Agentic Graph-Augmented RAG Framework for Technical Literature Reasoning

Kanwar Bharat Singh

The paper introduces TechGraphRAG, an advanced, agentic RAG framework that enhances technical literature reasoning by integrating multi-step query refinement, external database searching, and knowledg…

View →
cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 28, 2026

Rethinking Literature Search Evaluation: Deep Research Helps, and Human Citation Lists Are Not a Ground Truth

Gaurav Sahu, Laurent Charlin, Christopher Pal

The paper introduces a Deep Research pipeline that significantly improves literature search recall and demonstrates that human-curated citation lists are often unreliable and do not serve as a true gr…

View →
cs.CLcs.IREmpiricalRecentJul 1, 2026

Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction

Jisen Li, Bingxuan Li, Nanyi Jiang, Xuying Ning +9 more

PaperPilot is an interactive literature search agent that constructs an executable DAG of paper-search operators based on user queries and feedback, improving search results and reducing errors.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 22, 2026

Deep-Research Agents Can Be Poisoned via User-Generated Content

Tingwei Zhang, Harold Triedman, Vitaly Shmatikov

The paper demonstrates that deep-research agents are vulnerable to poisoning attacks where an adversary can inject malicious content into a single, frequently retrieved user-generated page to compromi…

View →
cs.AIcs.CYcs.MAEmpiricalRecentJun 29, 2026

Clarus: Coordinating Autonomous Research Agents toward Web-Scale Scientific Collaboration

Zihan Guo, Zeyi Chen, Zhiyu Chen, Zicai Cui +14 more

This paper presents Clarus, a collaboration infrastructure for coordinating autonomous research agents towards web-scale scientific collaboration.

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 21, 2026

PaperClaw: Harnessing Agents for Autonomous Research and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement

Weiwei Ye, Hangchen Liu, Dongyuan Li, Renhe Jiang

PAPERCLAW is a multi-agent system that autonomously curates a domain, generates ideas, and writes venue-compliant papers using large language models and a stoppable hypothesis map.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

AutoSci: A Memory-Centric Agentic System for the Full Scientific Research Lifecycle

Weitong Qian, Beicheng Xu, Zhongao Xie, Bowen Fan +15 more

AutoSci is a memory-centric agentic system designed to automate the entire scientific research lifecycle by integrating structured memory, multi-stage execution, and continuous self-improvement.

View →
cs.GTcs.IRcs.MANEWTheoreticalJul 28, 2026

Learning Dynamics of Strategic Publishers in Generative AI Ecosystems

Sagie Dekel, Omer Madmon, Moshe Tennenholtz, Oren Kurland

This paper introduces a game-theoretic model to study the emerging Generative AI (GenAI) ecosystem where publishers compete for attribution-based exposure.

View →