20 results for “scholarly information systems”
CS papers onlyHybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ
Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →
Yanglin Yan, Zicheng Xie, Tianchen Gao, Rui Pan +1 more
This paper proposes a semantic alignment framework for journal recommendation using large language models, achieving high accuracies and interpretable reasoning.
The paper introduces a novel, scalable framework to monitor and classify dataset usage within research literature, addressing the current lack of infrastructure for tracking data citations.
The paper introduces SPIRE, a multi-agent framework designed to extend LLM research capabilities to the humanities by enabling evidence-grounded interpretive reasoning over primary sources.
Jan Pennekamp, Johannes Lohmöller, David Schütte, Joscha Loos +1 more
This paper systematically analyzes 2.7 million arXiv submissions to demonstrate that nearly every preprint unintentionally discloses sensitive or unnecessary information through its source files, prop…
The paper introduces FOSSIL, a new multilingual dataset and specialized workflow designed to significantly improve the extraction of citations embedded within complex footnotes common in law and human…
The paper introduces a typed claim network that models cross-document references by explicitly labeling the stance (e.g., agreement, disagreement) of a citation, significantly improving downstream tas…
Kevin Schott, Kanishka Silva, Ingo Frommholz, Philipp Mayr +2 more
This paper evaluates the use of AI-generated summaries on search engine results pages (SERPs) in academic search for social science information.
Yongsik Seo, Wooseok Jeong, Eunyoung Kim, Hyeonseo Jang +1 more
The paper introduces CITETRACE, a large-scale dataset and evaluation framework that systematically measures structural citation failures in search-augmented LLMs, revealing a pattern called Verified M…
Qiong Tang, Xiangkun Hu, Xiangyang Liu, Yiran Chen +1 more
FARS is a fully automated AI-for-AI research system that generated and advanced 166 complete research papers across 67 topics in a large-scale public deployment, with evaluations from 282 reviews.
This paper compares sparse and dense retrieval models for scientific claim-source retrieval on the CheckThat! 2026 benchmark. Translating claims into English and incorporating publication metadata imp…
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of cluster-based semantic chunking compared to fixed-size and recursive chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems using the Retrieval Augmented Generati…
The paper introduces TechGraphRAG, an advanced, agentic RAG framework that enhances technical literature reasoning by integrating multi-step query refinement, external database searching, and knowledg…
The paper introduces a Deep Research pipeline that significantly improves literature search recall and demonstrates that human-curated citation lists are often unreliable and do not serve as a true gr…
Jisen Li, Bingxuan Li, Nanyi Jiang, Xuying Ning +9 more
PaperPilot is an interactive literature search agent that constructs an executable DAG of paper-search operators based on user queries and feedback, improving search results and reducing errors.
The paper demonstrates that deep-research agents are vulnerable to poisoning attacks where an adversary can inject malicious content into a single, frequently retrieved user-generated page to compromi…
Zihan Guo, Zeyi Chen, Zhiyu Chen, Zicai Cui +14 more
This paper presents Clarus, a collaboration infrastructure for coordinating autonomous research agents towards web-scale scientific collaboration.
PAPERCLAW is a multi-agent system that autonomously curates a domain, generates ideas, and writes venue-compliant papers using large language models and a stoppable hypothesis map.
Weitong Qian, Beicheng Xu, Zhongao Xie, Bowen Fan +15 more
AutoSci is a memory-centric agentic system designed to automate the entire scientific research lifecycle by integrating structured memory, multi-stage execution, and continuous self-improvement.
This paper introduces a game-theoretic model to study the emerging Generative AI (GenAI) ecosystem where publishers compete for attribution-based exposure.