Reinforcement learning to improve large language model-based automated code compliance systems
This paper presents P4IR, a two-stage framework for automated code compliance using supervised fine-tuning and Group Relative Policy Optimization, achieving significant improvements over baselines and leading LLMs.
Combining supervised fine-tuning and Group Relative Policy Optimization for more accurate and reliable LLM-based ACC systems.
Keywords
Before reading this…
Applications
- →Automated code compliance for building regulations
To understand this paper, make sure you know these concepts first:
- Understanding of large language models and automated code compliancefind papers →
Abstract
More Like ThisLarge language model (LLM)-based approaches for automated code compliance (ACC) of building regulations are prone to generating incorrect and hallucinated computer-processable rules. This paper introduces P4IR, a two-stage framework that uses supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to instill domain knowledge in an LLM, followed by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to improve the accuracy of the generated intermediate representations in the form of high-level code skeletons. The framework achieved reductions of up to 23.8% and 38.6% in tree edit distance and token-level Levenshtein distance respectively, relative to the SFT baselines. Comparative analysis demonstrates that this approach in a zero-shot setting outperforms leading LLMs in both code structure and semantics, specifically Claude Opus and Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.2, Qwen-3-Max, and GLM-4.7, evaluated via few-shot prompting. Additionally, the GRPO stage produced a small yet statistically significant reduction in false positives. By combining SFT with GRPO to optimize directly for domain-specific objectives, this approach offers a path toward more accurate and reliable LLM-based ACC systems.