Dropout and Random Gradient Masking Are Asymptotically Equivalent in Large ResNets
This paper shows that in the large depth and width asymptotics, Dropout and Random Gradient Masking (RaM) converge to the same limiting dynamics for ResNets.
Provides new insights into the convergence behavior of Dropout and RaM in the large scale limit for ResNets.
Before reading this…
Applications
- →Deep learning research
- →Training of complex neural networks
To understand this paper, make sure you know these concepts first:
- Understanding of deep learning conceptsfind papers →
- Familiarity with Dropout and RaM techniquesfind papers →
Abstract
More Like ThisDropout and Random Gradient Masking (RaM) are two training techniques used to improve performance in deep learning. Both techniques inject randomness into the training dynamics, but in significantly different ways: dropout applies random masks to the activations in the forward pass, whereas RaM leaves the forward pass unchanged and instead masks the gradients. In particular, the noise induced by RaM in the parameter updates is unbiased, so standard explanations for the effectiveness of dropout, such as the penalization effect or the prevention of co-adaptation between neurons, do not apply to RaM. In this work, we show that the difference between the two methods disappears for ResNets in the large depth and width asymptotics: in the complete feature learning regime, they both converge to the same large-scale limiting dynamics. This asymptotic equivalence holds for several variants of dropout and RaM, including layerwise dropout as used in stochastic-depth ResNets, albeit at slower quantitative rates. In fact, we also show that several of these variants collapse to the same limit asymptotically.