The Price of Meaning: Quantifying Semantic Communication Overheads in Practice
This paper develops an analytical framework to quantify the spectral-resource and energy costs of semantic communication (SemCom) and derives break-even conditions.
Provides a theoretical framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of semantic communication
Before reading this…
Applications
- →5G and beyond networks
To understand this paper, make sure you know these concepts first:
- Understanding of semantic communication and network costsfind papers →
Abstract
More Like ThisSemantic communication (SemCom) promises to reduce transmitted payloads by conveying task-relevant meaning instead of raw bits. However, practical SemCom also incurs semantic metadata, control signaling, feedback, model or knowledge-base synchronization, and neural computation costs, which may offset semantic compression gains. This paper develops an overhead-aware analytical framework for quantifying the spectral-resource and energy costs of SemCom under equal task utility. The framework covers point-to-point transmission, user equipment (UE)-to-next-generation NodeB (gNB) uplink, and UE-to-UE communication under a single gNB, and derives closed-form break-even conditions with respect to payload size, semantic compression factor, model reuse, protocol overhead, and computation energy. Simulation results show that SemCom becomes spectrally beneficial only for sufficiently large payloads, while energy gains require larger payloads due to processing and synchronization overheads. The results also show that multi-user downlink is particularly favorable, as shared semantic overheads can be amortized across multiple UEs. These findings provide design guidance for realistic SemCom evaluation and standardization-oriented deployment.