ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.16969v2· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 22, 2026

DeepXplain: XAI-Guided Autonomous Defense Against Multi-Stage APT Campaigns

Trung V. Phan, Thomas Bauschert

DeepXplain introduces an explainable deep reinforcement learning framework that enhances the trustworthiness and effectiveness of autonomous cyber defense against multi-stage APT campaigns by integrat…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.MARecentApr 6, 2026

Explainable Autonomous Cyber Defense using Adversarial Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Yiyao Zhang, Diksha Goel, Hussain Ahmad

The paper introduces C-MADF, a causally constrained multi-agent framework that significantly reduces false positives in autonomous cyber defense by restricting response actions to structurally consist…

View →
cs.CRcs.MARecentJun 4, 2026

ZERO-APT: A Closed-Loop Adversarial Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Penetration Testing under Intelligent Defense

Anlan Zheng, Tiantian Zhu

ZERO-APT introduces a novel closed-loop adversarial framework for automated penetration testing that simulates attacks against an intelligent, real-time defending system, achieving a high attack succe…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 10, 2026

Operationalizing Cybersecurity Governance for Mitigation Planning with Attack-Path Modeling and Reinforcement Learning

Philip Huff, Dakota Dale, Harshith Guduru, Rohan Singh +1 more

The paper proposes a system that operationalizes cybersecurity governance frameworks by integrating them with attack-path modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning to generate practical, resource-const…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 16, 2026

A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems

Ayan Javeed Shaikh, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Ankit Shah

The paper proposes an autonomous red teaming framework combining LLMs and RL to generate sophisticated, multi-stage cyber attack campaigns, demonstrating its necessity for evaluating robust AI-enabled…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 24, 2026

APT-Agent: Automated Penetration Testing using Large Language Models

William Guanting Li, Alsharif Abuadbba, Kristen Moore, Dan Dongseong Kim

The paper introduces APT-Agent, an automated LLM-driven framework that significantly improves penetration testing success rates by mitigating LLM hallucinations and maintaining long-term operational c…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 12, 2026

A Queueing-Theoretic Framework for Dynamic Attack Surfaces: Data-Integrated Risk Analysis and Adaptive Defense

Jihyeon Yun, Abdullah Yasin Etcibasi, Ming Shi, C. Emre Koksal

The paper introduces a queueing-theoretic framework to model dynamic cyber-attack surfaces, developing an adaptive reinforcement learning defense policy that significantly reduces active vulnerabiliti…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 30, 2026

Security Attack and Defense Strategies for Autonomous Agent Frameworks: A Layered Review with OpenClaw as a Case Study

Luyao Xu, Xiang Chen

This paper provides a systematic, layered review of security risks and defense strategies for autonomous agent frameworks, using OpenClaw as a case study to address the current lack of integrated rese…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework

Kexin Chu

The paper proposes the Layered Attack Surface Model (LASM), a structural taxonomy that maps security threats and defenses across the complex, multi-layered architecture of AI agents, revealing signifi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 20, 2026

PocketAgents: A Manifest-Driven Library of Autonomous Defense Agents

Sidnei Barbieri, Ágney Lopes Roth Ferraz, Lourenço Alves Pereira Júnior

PocketAgents introduces a manifest-driven framework for autonomous defense agents, enabling measurable and attributable LLM-driven security responses by strictly controlling agent actions and telemetr…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 27, 2026

AgentWard: A Lifecycle Security Architecture for Autonomous AI Agents

Yixiang Zhang, Xinhao Deng, Jiaqing Wu, Yue Xiao +2 more

The paper introduces AgentWard, a lifecycle-oriented, defense-in-depth architecture designed to systematically secure autonomous AI agents by protecting them across all stages of their operation.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Multi-Agent LLM Governance for Safe Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning in SDN-IoT Defense

Saeid Jamshidi, Negar Shahabi, Foutse Khomh, Carol Fung +1 more

The paper proposes a two-timescale governance framework using a multi-agent LLM to safely update and guide RL agents for SDN-IoT defense, significantly improving performance and stability under advers…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 27, 2026

Dynamic Cyber Ranges

Víctor Mayoral-Vilches, María Sanz-Gómez, Francesco Balassone, Maite Del Mundo De Torres +5 more

The paper proposes Dynamic Cyber Ranges, an advanced cyber range environment using LLM-driven Defender agents to counter the saturation of traditional security benchmarks, demonstrating that these dyn…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM

Mohammad Mamun, Mohamed Gaber, Scott Buffett, Sherif Saad

The paper evaluates Language Model Agents (LMAs) for red-teaming by benchmarking their ability to perform lateral movement, finding that expert-defined action plans are most effective, though all moda…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

LAAF: Logic-layer Automated Attack Framework A Systematic Red-Teaming Methodology for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Model Systems

Hammad Atta, Ken Huang, Kyriakos Rock Lambros, Yasir Mehmood +10 more

The paper introduces LAAF, a novel automated red-teaming framework, to systematically test and exploit Logic-layer Prompt Control Injection (LPCI) vulnerabilities in complex agentic LLM systems.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 10, 2026

Position: AI Security Policy Should Target Systems, Not Models

Michael A. Riegler, Inga Strümke

The paper demonstrates that advanced capabilities, such as jailbreaking large language models and finding software vulnerabilities, can be achieved effectively at zero cost by coordinating multiple sm…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 20, 2026

ProHunter: A Comprehensive APT Hunting System Based on Whole-System Provenance

Xuebo Qiu, Mingqi Lv, Yimei Zhang, Tiantian Zhu +1 more

ProHunter is an efficient and accurate system that uses whole-system provenance graphs to proactively hunt for Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs), outperforming existing methods in both efficiency and…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 14, 2026

Defenses at Odds: Measuring and Explaining Defense Conflicts in Large Language Models

Xiangtao Meng, Wenyu Chen, Chuanchao Zang, Xinyu Gao +4 more

This paper systematically measures and explains how sequential model defenses can conflict, finding that 38.9% of ordered defense sequences cause measurable risk exacerbation due to anti-aligned param…

View →