ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.19791v2· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 12, 2026

PrivacySIM: Evaluating LLM Simulation of User Privacy Behavior

James Flemings, Murali Annavaram

The paper introduces PrivacySIM, an evaluation suite that benchmarks how well LLMs can simulate individual user privacy decisions based on persona attributes, finding that while conditioning improves…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Profiling for Pennies: Unveiling the Privacy Iceberg of LLM Agents

Jiahao Chen, Qi Zhang, Ruixiao Lin, Chunyi Zhou +6 more

The paper introduces the PrivacyIceberg framework to systematically categorize and empirically demonstrate the high risk of automated, deep personal profiling using LLM agents, revealing a significant…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 31, 2026

Can LLMs Infer Conversational Agent Users' Personality Traits from Chat History?

Derya Cögendez, Verena Zimmermann, Noé Zufferey

This study quantifies the privacy risk of inferring sensitive personality traits from user interactions with LLM-based conversational agents, demonstrating that machine learning models can accurately…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

PersonaFingerprint: Measuring Persona Inference on Modern Websites with LLM-Driven Browsing

Chuxu Song, Hao Wang, Richard Martin

This paper demonstrates that encrypted traffic metadata (packet lengths and timing) can leak a user's persona, achieving high inference accuracy across multiple modern websites.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 13, 2026

Mobile GUI Agent Privacy Personalization with Trajectory Induced Preference Optimization

Zhixin Lin, Jungang Li, Dongliang Xu, Shidong Pan +4 more

The paper proposes Trajectory Induced Preference Optimization (TIPO) to improve mobile GUI agent personalization by explicitly modeling and optimizing for privacy-related behavioral differences in exe…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 16, 2026

Evaluating LLM Simulators as Differentially Private Data Generators

Nassima M. Bouzid, Dehao Yuan, Nam H. Nguyen, Mayana Pereira

The paper evaluates LLM-based simulators for generating differentially private synthetic data, finding that while they show promise for utility, they suffer from significant distribution drift due to…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentApr 4, 2026

Negotiating Privacy with Smart Voice Assistants: Risk-Benefit and Control-Acceptance Tensions

Molly Campbell, Mohamad Sheikho Al Jasem, Ajay Kumar Shrestha

This study proposes a negotiation framework, using composite indices (RBTI and CATI), to explain how youth navigate competing privacy pressures when using smart voice assistants, finding that high usa…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 18, 2026

Differential Privacy in Generative AI Agents: Analysis and Optimal Tradeoffs

Ya-Ting Yang, Quanyan Zhu

This paper develops a differential privacy framework to analyze and optimize privacy leakage from AI agent responses that utilize sensitive enterprise data, focusing on deriving optimal generation par…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 7, 2026

Say Something Else: Rethinking Contextual Privacy as Information Sufficiency

Yunze Xiao, Wenkai Li, Xiaoyuan Wu, Ningshan Ma +2 more

The paper proposes Information Sufficiency (IS) as a comprehensive framework for privacy-preserving LLM communication, demonstrating that free-text pseudonymization outperforms existing suppression an…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

RealityTest: How People Probe AI Identity and Whether Models Disclose It

Anna Gausen, Sarenne Wallbridge, Bessie O'Dell, Christopher Summerfield +1 more

RealityTest introduces a large-scale, multimodal, and multilingual benchmark using real-world human data to test how AI systems disclose their identity, finding that context and phrasing are more crit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 1, 2026

Do Phone-Use Agents Respect Your Privacy?

Zhengyang Tang, Ke Ji, Xidong Wang, Zihan Ye +18 more

The paper introduces MyPhoneBench, a new framework that demonstrates that current phone-use agents often fail to respect user privacy, even when successfully completing simple tasks, primarily due to…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 6, 2026

How Far Are VLMs from Privacy Awareness in the Physical World? An Empirical Study

Junran Wang, Xinjie Shen, Zehao Jin, Pan Li

The paper introduces ImmersedPrivacy, an interactive audio-visual framework, and finds that current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) deployed in physical environments suffer from significant deficits in…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 8, 2026

Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation

Qian Ma, Sarah Rajtmajer

The paper proposes RPSG, a method that uses private seeds and differential privacy to generate highly realistic and strongly privacy-preserving synthetic data replicas of private text for LLMs.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Adaptive Interviewing for Persona Simulation in LLMs: Evidence-Grounded Reasoning Improves Decision Alignment

Ruoxi Su, Yuhan Liu, Jingyu Hu

The paper introduces an adaptive interview framework to gather rich persona context, demonstrating that LLMs improve decision alignment in moral dilemmas only when they selectively ground their decisi…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

ChildEval: When large language models meet children's personalities

Yanyan Luo, Xue Han, Chunxu Zhao, Ruiqiao Bai +4 more

The paper introduces ChildEval, a large-scale benchmark designed to systematically evaluate how well large language models can infer and follow complex, child-specific preferences during long-context…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentApr 7, 2026

Understanding User Privacy Perceptions of GenAI Smartphones

Ran Jin, Liu Wang, Shidong Pan, Luona Xu +2 more

This study investigates user perceptions of privacy risks associated with GenAI smartphones, finding that users express heightened concerns across the entire data lifecycle and suggest comprehensive,…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

When Are LLM Inferences Acceptable? User Reactions and Control Preferences for Inferred Personal Information

Kyzyl Monteiro, Minjung Park, Alexander Ioffrida, Angelina Sanna +5 more

This study investigated user reactions to inferred personal information from their own ChatGPT histories, finding that acceptability is governed by context-sensitive norms regarding generation, retent…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 19, 2026

What Security and Privacy Transparency Users Need from Consumer-Facing Generative AI

Jiaxun Cao, Yu Dong, Chunxi Zhan, Rithvik Neti +2 more

The paper investigates how users perceive and utilize security and privacy transparency in consumer-facing generative AI, finding that users rely on proxies like popularity and require actionable, tru…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCRecentMay 28, 2026

EUDAIMONIA: Evaluating Undesirable Dynamics in AI

Jun Rui Huang, Wang Bill Zhu, Ziyi Liu, Nathanael Fast +2 more

The paper introduces EUDAIMONIA, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating how well LLMs align with user welfare in social interactions, finding that even state-of-the-art models frequently violate…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

MCP-Persona: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Real-World Personal Applications via Environment Simulation

Wenhao Wang, Peizhi Niu, Gongyi Zou, Xiyuan Yang +8 more

The paper introduces MCP-Persona, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate LLM agents' performance on real-world, personalized applications using the Model Context Protocol (MCP), revealing that current…

View →