ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.23304v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

When AI Meets Wall Street: A Survey on Trustworthy AI in Fintech

Qingwen Zeng, Zhenghao Zhao, Yitian Yang, Yiqi Zhu +5 more

This paper proposes a unified, lifecycle-centric framework and a detailed taxonomy to survey and analyze novel, finance-specific attack surfaces and vulnerabilities in AI systems used within the finan…

View →
cs.LOcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Type-Checked Compliance: Deterministic Guardrails for Agentic Financial Systems Using Lean 4 Theorem Proving

Devakh Rashie, Veda Rashi

The paper introduces the Lean-Agent Protocol, a formal verification platform that uses Lean 4 theorem proving to ensure agentic AI actions in finance are mathematically compliant with complex regulati…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.IRRecentMay 3, 2026

CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers

George Fatouros, Georgios Makridis, John Soldatos, Dimosthenis Kyriazis +17 more

The paper proposes CyberAId, a hybrid multi-agent system designed to enhance cybersecurity for financial institutions by integrating specialized LLM subagents with existing SIEM/XDR telemetry, address…

View →
cs.CRcs.CERecentApr 10, 2026

Conversations Risk Detection LLMs in Financial Agents via Multi-Stage Generative Rollout

Xiaotong Jiang, Jun Wu

The paper proposes FinSec, a novel four-tier security detection framework, to robustly identify complex financial risks and suspicious dialogue patterns in LLM-powered financial agents, achieving stat…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 21, 2026

Innovations in Cardless Artificial Intelligence Banking: A Comprehensive Framework for Cyber Secure and Fraud Mitigation using Machine Learning Algorithms

Md Israfeel

This paper proposes a comprehensive framework utilizing AI and machine learning to enhance cybersecurity and mitigate fraud risks in the emerging field of cardless artificial intelligence banking.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 11, 2026

Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

Souradip Nath, Chih-Yi Huang, Aditi Ganapathi, Kashyap Thimmaraju +2 more

Analyzing Reddit discussions, the paper finds that while security practitioners see LLMs as useful for boosting productivity, their adoption is constrained by concerns over reliability, verification,…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

Evaluating the Reliability of Multiple Large Language Models in Risk Assessment: A CIS Controls Based Approach

Gustavo Roberto Pinto, Arthur do Prado Labaki, Rodrigo Sanches Miani

The study compared the cybersecurity risk assessment capabilities of five popular large language models (LLMs) against human experts, finding that LLMs consistently underestimated risks and require ma…

View →
econ.GNcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 24, 2026

The Security Cost of Intelligence: AI Capability, Cyber Risk, and Deployment Paradox

Sukwoong Choi

The paper models the trade-off between deploying increasingly capable AI systems and managing associated cyber risks, finding a 'deployment paradox' where high-loss environments with weak governance l…

View →
cs.AIcs.CERecentJun 1, 2026

Absorbing Complexity: An Interaction-Native Knowledge Harness for Financial LLM Agents

Ailiya Borjigin, Igor Stadnyk, Ben Bilski, Maksym Chikita +3 more

The paper proposes the Interaction-Native Knowledge Harness (InKH), an architecture that absorbs complex context into financial LLM agents, significantly improving performance, reducing latency, and e…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 19, 2026

What Security and Privacy Transparency Users Need from Consumer-Facing Generative AI

Jiaxun Cao, Yu Dong, Chunxi Zhan, Rithvik Neti +2 more

The paper investigates how users perceive and utilize security and privacy transparency in consumer-facing generative AI, finding that users rely on proxies like popularity and require actionable, tru…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 22, 2026

From Preventive to Reactive: How AI Coding Assistants Transform Developers' Security Awareness

Faisal Haque Bappy, Tahrim Hossain, Sidratul Muntaher Meheraj, Annoor Sharara Akhand +4 more

The paper investigates how AI coding assistants shift developers' security focus from proactive prevention to reactive review, finding that this structural change is reinforced by current tool interac…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 10, 2026

Governing AI-Assisted Security Operations: A Design Science Framework for Operational Decision Support

Elyson A. De La Cruz, Rishikesh Sahay, Md Rasel Al Mamun

The paper proposes a management framework, using a governed AI query-broker artifact, to safely integrate generative AI into high-risk operational decision support, such as Security Operations Centers…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

From Specification to Deployment: Empirical Evidence from a W3C VC + DID Trust Infrastructure for Autonomous Agents

Lars Kersten Kroehl

The paper introduces MolTrust, a production-deployed trust infrastructure built on W3C standards (VCs and DIDs) that provides a verifiable, multi-layered authorization framework for autonomous AI agen…

View →
q-fin.RMcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

The Insurability Frontier of AI Risk: Mapping Threats to Affirmative Coverage, Silent Exposures, and Exclusions

Alex Leung, Rex Zhang, Ervin Ling, Kentaroh Toyoda +1 more

This paper maps the emerging insurability frontier of AI risk by coding 55 AI threat classes against 26 insurance products, identifying four tiers of coverage: affirmative, silent, excluded, and outsi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

Synthetic Trust Attacks: Modeling How Generative AI Manipulates Human Decisions in Social Engineering Fraud

Muhammad Tahir Ashraf

The paper introduces Synthetic Trust Attacks (STAs) as a formal threat category, arguing that AI fraud targets the victim's decision-making process rather than just synthetic media, and proposes a dec…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 23, 2026

From Frontier to Shadow AI: A Simmering Threat to Assurance and Security in Critical Infrastructure

Mohan Baruwal Chhetri, Shahroz Tariq, Tooba Aamir, Marthie Grobler +2 more

The paper empirically characterizes 'shadow AI'—the unsanctioned use of frontier AI in critical infrastructure—as a systemic threat that erodes established assurance and security controls.

View →
cs.DCcs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 6, 2026

Toward a Risk Assessment Framework for Institutional DeFi: A Nine-Dimension Approach

Eva Oberholzer, Valeriy Zamaraiev

The paper proposes a novel nine-dimension risk assessment framework for institutional DeFi adoption, significantly enhancing existing methodologies by incorporating novel dimensions like composability…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMar 19, 2026

Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections

Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan

This paper reviews recent EU AI regulatory documents to clarify definitions and synthesize current provisions regarding security, privacy, and autonomous agentic AI.

View →
cs.HCcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Extending the UXR Point of View Pyramid: A Generative AI-Augmented Methodology for Human-Centred AI Systems

Festus Fatai Adedoyin, Huseyin Dogan, Melike Akca, Abiodun Adedeji

The paper extends the User Experience Research (UXR) Points of View (PoV) framework into an AI-augmented methodology specifically designed for guiding the development and governance of high-stakes, hu…

View →