ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.12342v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGRecentMar 24, 2026

A Critical Review on the Effectiveness and Privacy Threats of Membership Inference Attacks

Najeeb Jebreel, David Sánchez, Josep Domingo-Ferrer

The paper proposes a new evaluation framework showing that, under realistic conditions, Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) are weak privacy threats, suggesting that relying on them as a primary priva…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 4, 2026

On the Privacy of LLMs: An Ablation Study

Karima Makhlouf, Lamiaa Basyoni, Syed Khaderi, Gabriel Marquez +3 more

This paper conducts a structured ablation study using a unified threat model to evaluate how various system factors (like model architecture and retrieval configuration) influence different types of p…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

Beyond Indistinguishability: Measuring Extraction Risk in LLM APIs

Ruixuan Liu, David Evans, Li Xiong

The paper introduces $(l, b)$-inextractability, a new formal measure that demonstrates that standard indistinguishability properties are insufficient for guaranteeing protection against data extractio…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 1, 2026

Revisiting Privacy Leakage in Machine Unlearning: Membership Inference Beyond the Forgotten Set

Jie Fu, Nima Naderloui, Da Zhong, Yuan Hong +1 more

This paper introduces TC-UMIA, a novel tri-class membership inference attack, demonstrating that machine unlearning can leak privacy risks to the retained data set, and evaluates defense mechanisms to…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 25, 2026

AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective

Zhenyi Wang, Siyu Luan

The paper proposes a unified closed-loop threat taxonomy to systematically analyze and defend foundation models by explicitly framing the bidirectional security interactions between data and models.

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.DCRecentApr 27, 2026

A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations

Zihan Liu, Yizhen Wang, Rui Wang, Xiu Tang +1 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, structured taxonomy of split learning techniques for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs), covering model optimization, system efficiency, and privacy preserv…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 14, 2026

Privacy Auditing with Zero (0) Training Run

Tudor Cebere, Mathieu Even, Linus Bleistein, Aurélien Bellet

The paper introduces Zero-Run privacy auditing, a post-hoc framework that allows for practical differential privacy evaluation of large, deployed models without requiring retraining or controlled data…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

Observable Channels, Not Just Storage: Evaluating Privacy Leakage in LLM Agent Pipelines

Tao Huang, Chen Hou, Guosen Wu, Jiayang Meng

The paper introduces CIPL, a unified channel-oriented framework, demonstrating that privacy leakage in LLM agents is governed by observable data channels and pipeline interactions, rather than being l…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

What Does the Server See? Understanding Privacy Leakage from Large Language Models in Split Inference

Mingyuan Fan, Yu Liu, Fuyi Wang, Cen Chen

The paper introduces ActInv and PAF to systematically analyze and quantify privacy leakage from intermediate activations during split inference of LLMs, proposing PriPert for enhanced defense.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 14, 2026

Evaluating Differential Privacy Against Membership Inference in Federated Learning: Insights from the NIST Genomics Red Team Challenge

Gustavo de Carvalho Bertoli

This paper empirically evaluates the effectiveness of Differential Privacy (DP) against Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) in Federated Learning, demonstrating that a stacking attack strategy can det…

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

On Reliability of Efficient Membership Inference Vulnerability Evaluation

Joonas Jälkö, Gauri Pradhan, Ossi Räisä, Antti Honkela

This paper analyzes the reliability of efficient membership inference attack (MIA) evaluation methods, demonstrating that standard aggregation techniques introduce biases that compromise accurate vuln…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

Differentially Private Model Merging

Qichuan Yin, Manzil Zaheer, Tian Li

This paper proposes two post-processing techniques, random selection and linear combination, to construct a model that satisfies any desired differential privacy level without retraining, given a set…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 26, 2026

Spore: Efficient and Training-Free Privacy Extraction Attack on LLMs via Inference-Time Hybrid Probing

Yu Cui, Ruiqing Yue, Hang Fu, Sicheng Pan +5 more

The paper introduces extsc{Spore}, a novel, training-free, and highly efficient privacy extraction attack that targets sensitive information stored in the memory of LLM agents during inference, outpe…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 29, 2026

Quantamination: Dynamic Quantization Leaks Your Data Across the Batch

Hanna Foerster, Ilia Shumailov, Cheng Zhang, Yiren Zhao +2 more

This paper identifies a critical privacy vulnerability, termed Quantamination, where dynamic quantization in popular ML frameworks can leak sensitive user data across batch boundaries.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 30, 2026

Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors

Zi Li, Tian Zhou, Wenze Li, Jingyu Hua +2 more

This paper introduces a novel supply-chain attack that uses model code backdoors to actively steal sensitive secrets from local LLM fine-tuning datasets, bypassing current privacy defenses.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 21, 2026

A Data-Free Membership Inference Attack on Federated Learning in Hardware Assurance

Gijung Lee, Wavid Bowman, Olivia P. Dizon-Paradis, Reiner N. Dizon-Paradis +3 more

This paper presents a novel data-free Membership Inference Attack (MIA) that uses gradient inversion on Standard Cell Library Layouts (SCLLs) to reconstruct sensitive hardware images from intercepted…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say

Mingxuan Zhang, Jiahui Han, Dadi Guo, Songze Li +4 more

The paper introduces PrivacyPeek, a new benchmark that audits the acquisition stage of LLM-based agents to demonstrate that unnecessary acquisition of sensitive data is a widespread and critical priva…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say

Mingxuan Zhang, Jiahui Han, Dadi Guo, Songze Li +4 more

The paper introduces PrivacyPeek, a new benchmark that audits the acquisition stage of LLM-based agents to show that unnecessary and sensitive data acquisition is a widespread and critical privacy vul…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Rethinking the Security of DP-SGD: A Corrected Analysis of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Wenhao Wang, Shujie Cui, Hui Cui, Xingliang Yuan

This paper corrects the theoretical analysis of DP-SGD by identifying that common implementations, which use batch averaging, result in weaker privacy guarantees than previously reported.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

TrEEStealer: Stealing Decision Trees via Enclave Side Channels

Jonas Sander, Anja Rabich, Nick Mahling, Felix Maurer +4 more

The paper introduces TrEEStealer, a novel side-channel attack that efficiently steals Decision Trees (DTs) protected within Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), demonstrating that TEEs fail to provi…

View →