ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.19438v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 18, 2026

Learning to Look Benign: Targeted Evasion of Malware Detectors via API Import Injection

Juozas Dautartas, Olga Kurasova, Juozapas Rokas Čypas, Viktor Medvedev

The paper proposes a framework to intentionally evade malware detectors by adding a small number of benign API imports, successfully demonstrating targeted misclassification into a chosen benign categ…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentJun 4, 2026

An Embarrassingly Simple Detector for Model Extraction Attacks in Large Language Model API Traffic

Shuze Liu, Qianwen Guo, Yushun Dong

The paper proposes an embarrassingly simple detector that monitors model extraction attacks by testing whether the aggregate distribution of incoming LLM queries deviates from the historical distribut…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 29, 2026

eDySec: A Deep Learning-based Explainable Dynamic Analysis Framework for Detecting Malicious Packages in PyPI Ecosystem

Sk Tanzir Mehedi, Raja Jurdak, Chadni Islam, Abu Bakar Siddique Mahi +1 more

eDySec introduces a deep learning framework for dynamic behavioral analysis that significantly improves the detection of malicious software packages in the PyPI ecosystem by enhancing stability and ex…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 14, 2026

PickleFuzzer: A Case Study in Fuzzing for Discrepancies Between Python Pickle Implementations

Justin Applegate, Andreas Kellas

The paper introduces PickleFuzzer, a custom fuzzer that identifies security-critical discrepancies across different Python pickle implementations, finding 14 new bugs including four that could bypass…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 7, 2026

Beyond the Wrapper: Identifying Artifact Reliance in Static Malware Classifiers using TRUSTEE

Riyazuddin Mohammed, Lan Zhang

The paper demonstrates that static malware classifiers often rely on superficial artifacts like packing and metadata rather than true malicious semantics, using the TRUSTEE interpretability tool to di…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 12, 2026

Machine Learning-Based Detection of MCP Attacks

Tobias Mattsson, Samuel Nyberg, Anton Borg, Ricardo Britto

This paper develops and evaluates supervised machine learning models to detect malicious tool descriptions within the Model Context Protocol (MCP), achieving high detection rates in both binary and mu…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 28, 2026

"Elementary, My Dear Watson." Detecting Malicious Skills via Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning across Heterogeneous Artifacts

Shenao Wang, Junjie He, Yanjie Zhao, Yayi Wang +2 more

The paper introduces MalSkills, a neuro-symbolic framework that detects malicious skills in the expanding agentic supply chain by analyzing security-sensitive operations across heterogeneous artifacts…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 30, 2026

Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features

Rebecca Saul, Jingzhi Jiang, Elliott Chia, David Wagner

The paper introduces Trident, a novel malware detection system that combines static features, LLM-derived behavioral rules, and direct LLM analysis to achieve superior robustness against concept drift…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 31, 2026

ClawHub Security Signals: When VirusTotal, Static Analysis, and SkillSpector Disagree

Vincent Koc, Patrick Erichsen, Jacob Tomlinson, Agustin Rivera +2 more

The paper analyzes a dataset of agent skills, demonstrating that different security scanners (VirusTotal, static analysis, SkillSpector) rarely agree, necessitating a layered governance approach for s…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 31, 2026

ClawHub Security Signals: When VirusTotal, Static Analysis, and SkillSpector Disagree

Vincent Koc, Patrick Erichsen, Jacob Tomlinson, Agustin Rivera +2 more

The paper analyzes a dataset of agent skills, demonstrating that different security scanners (VirusTotal, static analysis, SkillSpector) rarely agree on maliciousness, necessitating layered security g…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these honeypots provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these systems provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect i…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 10, 2026

Position: AI Security Policy Should Target Systems, Not Models

Michael A. Riegler, Inga Strümke

The paper demonstrates that advanced capabilities, such as jailbreaking large language models and finding software vulnerabilities, can be achieved effectively at zero cost by coordinating multiple sm…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 25, 2026

AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective

Zhenyi Wang, Siyu Luan

The paper proposes a unified closed-loop threat taxonomy to systematically analyze and defend foundation models by explicitly framing the bidirectional security interactions between data and models.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection

Divyesh Gabbireddy, Suman Saha

This paper proposes a structured pipeline using LLMs to generate and evaluate obfuscated XSS payloads, demonstrating that while LLMs can generate samples, they currently struggle to ensure payloads ma…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 20, 2026

HIDBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Host-Based Intrusion Detection

Danyu Sun, Jinghuai Zhang, Yuan Tian, Zhou Li

The paper introduces HIDBench, a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to perform host-based intrusion detection using complex, noisy system logs, finding that model performance degrades signific…

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

Label-efficient Training Updates for Malware Detection over Time

Luca Minnei, Cristian Manca, Giorgio Piras, Angelo Sotgiu +5 more

The paper proposes a model-agnostic framework to evaluate combining Active Learning (AL) and Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) techniques for malware detection, demonstrating that these combined methods…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 3, 2026

ML Defender (aRGus NDR): An Open-Source Embedded ML NIDS for Botnet and Anomalous Traffic Detection in Resource-Constrained Organizations

Alonso Isidoro Román

ML Defender (aRGus NDR) is an open-source, embedded Machine Learning Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) that achieves superior detection rates for botnet and anomalous traffic on resource-const…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 29, 2026

Tatemae: Detecting Alignment Faking via Tool Selection in LLMs

Matteo Leonesi, Francesco Belardinelli, Flavio Corradini, Marco Piangerelli

The paper proposes detecting 'alignment faking' (AF)—where LLMs revert to unsafe behavior when unmonitored—by analyzing observable tool selection patterns, finding that detection rates vary significan…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 11, 2026

Continuous Discovery of Vulnerabilities in LLM Serving Systems with Fuzzing

Yunze Zhao, Yibo Zhao, Yuchen Zhang, Zaoxing Liu +1 more

The paper introduces GRIEF, a greybox fuzzer that discovers critical, concurrency-related vulnerabilities in LLM serving systems by treating timed multi-request traces as inputs, finding issues like c…

View →