ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.23067v1· 20 results

cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

Redefining AI Red Teaming in the Agentic Era: From Weeks to Hours

Raja Sekhar Rao Dheekonda, Will Pearce, Nick Landers

The paper introduces an AI red teaming agent that drastically reduces the time and effort required for security testing by allowing operators to define complex attack goals using natural language, com…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM

Mohammad Mamun, Mohamed Gaber, Scott Buffett, Sherif Saad

The paper evaluates Language Model Agents (LMAs) for red-teaming by benchmarking their ability to perform lateral movement, finding that expert-defined action plans are most effective, though all moda…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 5, 2026

SkillAttack: Automated Red Teaming of Agent Skills through Attack Path Refinement

Zenghao Duan, Yuxin Tian, Zhiyi Yin, Liang Pang +5 more

SkillAttack is a red-teaming framework that dynamically tests the exploitability of latent vulnerabilities in LLM agent skills using adversarial prompting, demonstrating that even benign skills pose s…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

LAAF: Logic-layer Automated Attack Framework A Systematic Red-Teaming Methodology for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Model Systems

Hammad Atta, Ken Huang, Kyriakos Rock Lambros, Yasir Mehmood +10 more

The paper introduces LAAF, a novel automated red-teaming framework, to systematically test and exploit Logic-layer Prompt Control Injection (LPCI) vulnerabilities in complex agentic LLM systems.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

ARES: Adaptive Red-Teaming and End-to-End Repair of Policy-Reward System

Jiacheng Liang, Yao Ma, Tharindu Kumarage, Satyapriya Krishna +4 more

ARES is a novel framework that systematically discovers and mitigates dual vulnerabilities in RLHF systems by simultaneously testing the core LLM and its Reward Model (RM) using structured adversarial…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.ETRecentMay 30, 2026

Quality-Diversity Evolution for Discovering Diverse Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety

Subhadip Mitra

The paper introduces a quality-diversity evolutionary framework that evolves interpretable attack strategies, successfully discovering distinct and systematic vulnerabilities in major LLMs like GPT-4o…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.ETRecentMay 30, 2026

Quality-Diversity Evolution for Discovering Diverse Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety

Subhadip Mitra

The paper introduces a quality-diversity evolutionary framework that discovers diverse, interpretable vulnerabilities in large language models by evolving attack strategies at the semantic level, reve…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 13, 2026

Model-Agnostic Lifelong LLM Safety via Externalized Attack-Defense Co-Evolution

Xiaozhe Zhang, Chaozhuo Li, Hui Liu, Shaocheng Yan +3 more

The EvoSafety framework enhances LLM safety by externalizing attack and defense mechanisms, enabling persistent, transferable, and model-agnostic robustness against adversarial prompts.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 16, 2026

A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems

Ayan Javeed Shaikh, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Ankit Shah

The paper proposes an autonomous red teaming framework combining LLMs and RL to generate sophisticated, multi-stage cyber attack campaigns, demonstrating its necessity for evaluating robust AI-enabled…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 21, 2026

T-MAP: Red-Teaming LLM Agents with Trajectory-aware Evolutionary Search

Hyomin Lee, Sangwoo Park, Yumin Choi, Sohyun An +2 more

The paper introduces T-MAP, a trajectory-aware evolutionary search method, to discover and generate multi-step adversarial prompts that exploit vulnerabilities in autonomous LLM agents through tool ex…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 23, 2026

AutoRISE: Agent-Driven Strategy Evolution for Red-Teaming Large Language Models

Tanmay Gautam, Alireza Bahramali, Sandeep Atluri

AutoRISE proposes optimizing the entire attack strategy—by searching over executable programs—rather than just optimizing prompts, achieving significant improvements in red-teaming large language mode…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 19, 2026

The Autonomy Tax: Defense Training Breaks LLM Agents

Shawn Li, Yue Zhao

Defense training for LLM agents, intended to improve safety, systematically degrades their core competence, leading to unreliability in multi-step tasks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 6, 2026

Mapping the Exploitation Surface: A 10,000-Trial Taxonomy of What Makes LLM Agents Exploit Vulnerabilities

Charafeddine Mouzouni

The paper systematically maps LLM agent vulnerabilities by testing 10,000 prompt variations, finding that 'goal reframing' language is the primary trigger for exploitation, rather than broad adversari…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 3, 2026

Domain-Conditioned Safety in Frontier Computer-Using Agents: A 793-Episode Browser Benchmark, a Coding-Domain Cross-Reference, and a Reproducibility Audit of Recent Red-Teaming

Nicholas Saban

The paper benchmarks current frontier computer-using agents against hand-crafted attacks, finding that while they are highly safe in browser tasks, this safety does not generalize to other domains lik…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 19, 2026

ClawTrap: A MITM-Based Red-Teaming Framework for Real-World OpenClaw Security Evaluation

Haochen Zhao, Shaoyang Cui

The paper introduces ClawTrap, a MITM-based red-teaming framework, to evaluate the security robustness of web agents like OpenClaw against dynamic, real-world network attacks, finding that model stren…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges

Ali Al-Kaswan, Maksim Plotnikov, Maxim Hájek, Roland Vízner +2 more

The paper introduces DeepRed, a new benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in realistic CTF challenges, finding that current agents are limited, achieving only 35% average checkpoint completion.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 24, 2026

Automation-Exploit: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Adaptive Offensive Security with Digital Twin-Based Risk-Mitigated Exploitation

Biagio Andreucci, Arcangelo Castiglione

Automation-Exploit is a multi-agent LLM framework that enables adaptive offensive security by using a digital twin to safely test and execute high-risk memory-corruption exploits on live targets.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 21, 2026

Blind Spots in the Guard: How Domain-Camouflaged Injection Attacks Evade Detection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Aaditya Pai

The paper identifies a critical vulnerability, the Camouflage Detection Gap (CDG), where standard LLM injection detectors fail dramatically when malicious payloads mimic the target domain's language a…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 28, 2026

Red-MIRROR: Agentic LLM-based Autonomous Penetration Testing with Reflective Verification and Knowledge-augmented Interaction

Tran Vy Khang, Nguyen Dang Nguyen Khang, Nghi Hoang Khoa, Do Thi Thu Hien +2 more

Red-MIRROR is a novel multi-agent LLM system that automates complex web penetration testing by integrating a memory-reflection backbone, achieving superior performance on industry benchmarks.

View →