ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.00081v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 19, 2026

A Framework for Formalizing LLM Agent Security

Vincent Siu, Jingxuan He, Kyle Montgomery, Zhun Wang +3 more

The paper introduces a contextual security framework for LLM agents, defining security properties and reformulating various attacks and defenses based on the context of execution.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 18, 2026

Agent Security is a Systems Problem

Mihai Christodorescu, Earlence Fernandes, Ashish Hooda, Somesh Jha +10 more

The paper argues that agent security must be treated as a systems problem, requiring the enforcement of security invariants at the system level rather than solely relying on improving the underlying A…

View →
cs.MAcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 24, 2026

Beyond Single-Agent Alignment: Preventing Context-Fragmented Violations in Multi-Agent Systems

Jie Wu, Ming Gong

The paper introduces Distributed Sentinel, a zero-trust architecture that prevents Context-Fragmented Violations (CFVs) in multi-agent systems by propagating security state across departmental boundar…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 5, 2026

TraceGuard: Structured Multi-Dimensional Monitoring as a Collusion-Resistant Control Protocol

Khanh Linh Nguyen, Hoa Nghiem, Tu Tran

TraceGuard introduces a structured, multi-dimensional monitoring protocol that significantly improves the detection of subtle attacks in AI agents while maintaining collusion resistance.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentMay 9, 2026

Containment Verification: AI Safety Guarantees Independent of Alignment

Royce Moon, Lav R. Varshney

The paper introduces containment verification, a novel method that provides safety guarantees by formally verifying the agentic framework itself, ensuring safety regardless of the underlying AI model'…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 19, 2026

Measuring Safety Alignment Effects in Autonomous Security Agents

Isaac David, Arthur Gervais

The study evaluates how safety alignment affects autonomous security agents using a comprehensive trace-based benchmark, finding that while less-restricted models show gains, these effects are not uni…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 16, 2026

Securing LLM Agents Need Intent-to-Execution Integrity

Wenjie Qu, Ming Xu, Peiran Wang, Shengfang Zhai +2 more

The paper proposes defining 'intent-to-execution integrity' as the necessary end-to-end correctness property for securing LLM agents, arguing that current defenses are insufficient due to untrusted co…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 26, 2026

Structural Enforcement of Goal Integrity in AI Agents via Separation-of-Powers Architecture

Rong Xiang

The paper proposes the Policy-Execution-Authorization (PEA) architecture, a separation-of-powers system designed to structurally enforce goal integrity in AI agents, moving safety from a probabilistic…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 24, 2026

Agent-Sentry: Bounding LLM Agents via Execution Provenance

Rohan Sequeira, Stavros Damianakis, Umar Iqbal, Konstantinos Psounis

Agent-Sentry is a runtime defense system that bounds the execution of LLM agents by learning a profile of benign behavior, effectively blocking malicious injections while maintaining high compatibilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 22, 2026

When Convenience Becomes Risk: A Semantic View of Under-Specification in Host-Acting Agents

Di Lu, Yongzhi Liao, Xutong Mu, Lele Zheng +4 more

The paper identifies that the convenience of host-acting agents leads to semantic under-specification in user goals, which forces the agent to generate potentially risky execution plans.

View →
cs.LOcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Type-Checked Compliance: Deterministic Guardrails for Agentic Financial Systems Using Lean 4 Theorem Proving

Devakh Rashie, Veda Rashi

The paper introduces the Lean-Agent Protocol, a formal verification platform that uses Lean 4 theorem proving to ensure agentic AI actions in finance are mathematically compliant with complex regulati…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 13, 2026

No Attack Required: Semantic Fuzzing for Specification Violations in Agent Skills

Ying Li, Hongbo Wen, Yanju Chen, Hanzhi Liu +2 more

The paper introduces Sefz, a semantic fuzzing framework that automatically discovers specification violations in LLM agent skills, finding a significant number of previously unknown exploitable guardr…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

AgentRFC: Security Design Principles and Conformance Testing for Agent Protocols

Shenghan Zheng, Qifan Zhang

The paper introduces a comprehensive security framework, AgentRFC, to systematically analyze and test the security conformance of various AI agent protocols, identifying critical design gaps, especial…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 25, 2026

When the Agent Is the Adversary: Architectural Requirements for Agentic AI Containment After the April 2026 Frontier Model Escape

Richard Joseph Mitchell

The paper analyzes the failure modes of current AI containment methods when the agent itself is the adversary, deriving five necessary architectural requirements for durable safety.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Grimlock: Guarding High-Agency Systems with eBPF and Attested Channels

Qiancheng Wu, Wenhui Zhang, Gan Fang, Sheng Mao +4 more

Grimlock is an Agent Guard that enhances security for high-agency systems by enforcing identity, authorization, and scope-bound communication through eBPF and attested TLS channels, without modifying…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 25, 2026

AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents

Faruk Alpay, Taylan Alpay

The paper introduces AgentSecBench, a security evaluation framework that measures prompt injection, privacy leakage, and tool-use integrity in LLM agents by defining formal security games and testing…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 5, 2026

MOSAIC-Bench: Measuring Compositional Vulnerability Induction in Coding Agents

Jonathan Steinberg, Oren Gal

The paper introduces MOSAIC-Bench, a benchmark demonstrating that coding agents can ship exploitable code by complying with seemingly innocuous, staged tasks, a vulnerability that is not easily mitiga…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 13, 2026

ClawGuard: A Runtime Security Framework for Tool-Augmented LLM Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection

Wei Zhao, Zhe Li, Peixin Zhang, Jun Sun

ClawGuard is a novel runtime security framework that deterministically enforces user-confirmed rules at tool-call boundaries to protect LLM agents from indirect prompt injection.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.ETRecentMar 27, 2026

Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?

Shiping Chen, Qin Wang, Guangsheng Yu, Xu Wang +1 more

This paper systematizes the security challenges of open agentic systems, concluding that while attack characterization is mature, the field lacks robust guidelines for operational governance, memory i…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 28, 2026

From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems

Ignacio Peyrano

The paper proposes a Semantic Gateway and a Zero-Trust security model to formally validate and secure autonomous AI agents operating in enterprise systems, achieving a 100% discovery rate of unauthori…

View →