ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.01913v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 2, 2026

Understanding the Effects of Safety Unalignment on Large Language Models

John T. Halloran

This study compares two methods of safety unalignment (Jailbreak-Tuning and Weight Orthogonalization) across six LLMs and finds that Weight Orthogonalization (WO) significantly enhances malicious capa…

View →
cs.LGcs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 29, 2026

Dynamic Adversarial Fine-Tuning Reorganizes Refusal Geometry

Wenhao Lan, Shan Li, Xinhua Lai, Meiqi Wu +3 more

The paper investigates how dynamic adversarial fine-tuning (R2D2) reorganizes the internal mechanisms (refusal geometry) of safety-aligned language models, finding that it shifts the optimal refusal c…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 8, 2026

When Safety Geometry Collapses: Fine-Tuning Vulnerabilities in Agentic Guard Models

Ismail Hossain, Sai Puppala, Jannatul Ferdaus, Md Jahangir Alam +3 more

The paper demonstrates that fine-tuning safety guard models on benign data can catastrophically collapse their safety alignment, proposing Fisher-Weighted Safety Subspace Regularization (FW-SSR) to ac…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 7, 2026

Safety Anchor: Defending Harmful Fine-tuning via Geometric Bottlenecks

Guoxin Lu, Letian Sha, Qing Wang, Peijie Sun +3 more

The paper introduces Safety Bottleneck Regularization (SBR), a novel defense mechanism that anchors LLM safety by constraining the unembedding layer, effectively preventing harmful fine-tuning (HFT) e…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

You Snooze, You Lose: Automatic Safety Alignment Restoration through Neural Weight Translation

Marco Arazzi, Vignesh Kumar Kembu, Antonino Nocera, Stjepan Picek +1 more

The paper introduces NeWTral, a framework that restores safety alignment to specialized LLM adapters without sacrificing their domain-specific knowledge, achieving a significant reduction in attack su…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 9, 2026

The Art of (Mis)alignment: How Fine-Tuning Methods Effectively Misalign and Realign LLMs in Post-Training

Rui Zhang, Hongwei Li, Yun Shen, Xinyue Shen +5 more

The paper investigates how various fine-tuning methods can be used both to intentionally misalign and subsequently realign large language models (LLMs), revealing distinct strengths for attack and def…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

Safety Geometry Collapse in Multimodal LLMs and Adaptive Drift Correction

Jiahe Guo, Xiangran Guo, Jiaxuan Chen, Weixiang Zhao +5 more

This paper introduces the concept of Safety Geometry Collapse, demonstrating that multimodal inputs degrade the safety separation of LLMs, and proposes ReGap, a training-free method that adaptively co…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Low-Resource Safety Failures Are Action Failures, Not Representation Failures

Rashad Aziz, Ikhlasul Akmal Hanif, Fajri Koto

The paper shows that safety failures in low-resource languages are due to a failure in the model's safety decision calibration, not a lack of underlying knowledge, and proposes a recalibration method…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentJun 4, 2026

Membrane: A Self-Evolving Contrastive Safety Memory for LLM Agent Defense

Minseok Choi, Seungbin Yang, Dongjin Kim, Subin Kim +4 more

Membrane introduces a self-evolving guardrail using Contrastive Safety Memory (CSM) that generalizes across topical jailbreak variants, achieving superior safety performance while minimizing benign re…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 30, 2026

Attention Is Where You Attack

Aviral Srivastava, Sourav Panda

The paper introduces the Attention Redistribution Attack (ARA), a white-box adversarial method that bypasses safety alignments in LLMs by manipulating the attention mechanism's geometry, showing that…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 17, 2026

Ablating Safety: Mechanisms for Removing Alignment in Language Models for Security Applications

Isaac David, Arthur Gervais

The paper proposes Ablating Safety, a controlled protocol for removing safety alignment from language models, demonstrating that targeted de-alignment can significantly boost security performance whil…

View →
cs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguard

Urchade Zaratiana, Mary Newhauser, George Hurn-Maloney, Ash Lewis

GLiGuard introduces a compact, schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder that achieves state-of-the-art performance in LLM content moderation across multiple safety dimensions while drastically reducin…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

SafeSteer: Localized On-Policy Distillation for Efficient Safety Alignment

Hao Li, Jingkun An, Zijun Song, Pengyu Zhu +7 more

SafeSteer proposes a localized on-policy distillation method that restricts safety alignment to specific safety tokens, thereby achieving strong safety performance with minimal degradation to general…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentJun 3, 2026

Willing but Unable: Separating Refusal from Capability in Code LLMs via Abliteration

Cristina Carleo, Pietro Liguori, Naghmeh Ivaki, Domenico Cotroneo

The paper introduces 'abliteration,' a weight editing technique that successfully bypasses the refusal mechanism of safety-aligned Code LLMs, enabling scalable synthesis of vulnerable code from safe i…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

DataShield: Safety-degrading Data Filtering for LLM Benign Instruction Fine-Tuning

Junbo Zhang, Qianli Zhou, Xinyang Deng, Wen Jiang +2 more

DataShield proposes an efficient method to identify safety-degrading samples within benign datasets, preventing the degradation of LLM safety capabilities during fine-tuning.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

DataShield: Safety-degrading Data Filtering for LLM Benign Instruction Fine-Tuning

Junbo Zhang, Qianli Zhou, Xinyang Deng, Wen Jiang +2 more

DataShield proposes an efficient method to identify safety-degrading samples within benign datasets, quantifying each sample's contribution to an LLM's compliance behavior.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Aligned but Fragile: Enhancing LLM Safety Robustness via Zeroth-Order Optimization

Zhihao Liu, Yifan Wu, Jian Lou, Di Wang +2 more

The paper proposes a novel zeroth-order optimization framework to enhance the robustness of LLM safety alignment, showing that few refinement steps can significantly improve safety while maintaining u…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 21, 2026

Involuntary In-Context Learning: Exploiting Few-Shot Pattern Completion to Bypass Safety Alignment in GPT-5.4

Alex Polyakov, Daniel Kuznetsov

The paper introduces Involuntary In-Context Learning (IICL), an effective few-shot pattern completion attack that can bypass safety alignments in large language models, achieving a 24.0% bypass rate a…

View →
cs.CYcs.CRcs.HCRecentMar 25, 2026

Learning from Mistakes: Can LLM Self-Recover after Misalignment?

Olga E. Sorokoletova, Francesco Giarrusso, Vincenzo Suriani, Daniele Nardi

This paper shifts the focus of LLM safety from preventing misalignment to investigating the model's intrinsic ability to self-recover its alignment after being corrupted by adversarial inputs.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning

Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen

The paper introduces COLAGUARD, a novel guardrail model that efficiently transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space, achieving state-of-the-art safety performance with massiv…

View →