ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.21773v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these honeypots provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov +5 more

The paper introduces Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework, to rigorously test LLM-powered HTTP honeypots, demonstrating that these systems provide substantially longer and harder-to-detect i…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentJun 4, 2026

An Embarrassingly Simple Detector for Model Extraction Attacks in Large Language Model API Traffic

Shuze Liu, Qianwen Guo, Yushun Dong

The paper proposes an embarrassingly simple detector that monitors model extraction attacks by testing whether the aggregate distribution of incoming LLM queries deviates from the historical distribut…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Threat Modelling using Domain-Adapted Language Models: Empirical Evaluation and Insights

Saba Pourhanifeh, AbdulAziz AbdulGhaffar, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper empirically evaluates domain-adapted and general-purpose LLMs for structured threat modelling (STRIDE on 5G security), finding that domain adaptation and model size do not guarantee reliable…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 8, 2026

CyBiasBench: Benchmarking Bias in LLM Agents for Cyber-Attack Scenarios

Taein Lim, Seongyong Ju, Munhyeok Kim, Hyunjun Kim +1 more

The paper introduces CyBiasBench, a comprehensive benchmark that quantifies the inherent, agent-specific bias in LLM agents' attack selection patterns in cybersecurity scenarios.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 11, 2026

Content-Aware Attack Detection in LLM Agent Tool-Call Traffic: An Empirical Study of Features, Architectures, and Evaluation Protocols

Sultan Zavrak

The paper proposes a graph-based framework for detecting attacks in LLM agent tool-call traffic, finding that content-level embeddings are crucial for high accuracy and that tree ensembles on these em…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 23, 2026

Poisoning the Watchtower: Prompt Injection Attacks Against LLM-Augmented Security Operations Through Adversarial Log Content

Rohan Pandey, Archit Bhujang

The paper introduces 'log-substrate prompt injection,' demonstrating that attacker-controlled log fields can be used to manipulate LLM-powered security analysis, with persona hijacking and context man…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and success rate of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation capabilit…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

How Reliable Are AI Attackers Against a Fixed Vulnerable Target? A 400-Run Empirical Study of LLM Penetration Testing Consistency

Galip Tolga Erdem

This study empirically measures the consistency and effectiveness of autonomous LLM penetration testing across multiple services, finding statistically significant differences in exploitation rates am…

View →
cs.CRcs.IRcs.LGRecentJun 3, 2026

NLLog: Lightweight, Explainable SOC Anomaly Detection via Log-to-Language Rewriting

Samuel Ndichu, Tao Ban, Seiichi Ozawa, Takeshi Takahashi +1 more

NLLog introduces a lightweight system that converts structured security logs into natural language sentences for improved anomaly detection, achieving high performance with low false-positive rates su…

View →
cs.CRcs.IRcs.LGRecentJun 3, 2026

NLLog: Lightweight, Explainable SOC Anomaly Detection via Log-to-Language Rewriting

Samuel Ndichu, Tao Ban, Seiichi Ozawa, Takeshi Takahashi +1 more

NLLog is a lightweight pipeline that rewrites system-generated logs into natural language for improved analysis and comprehension.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 23, 2026

CyberMaskQA: A Privacy-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Cybersecurity Question Answering

Matilda Gaddi, Jin Noh, Onat Gungor, Tajana Rosing

The paper introduces CYBERMASKQA, a novel privacy-aware benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models' ability to perform accurate cybersecurity question answering while simultaneously preservi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 22, 2026

CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledge

Gustav Keppler, Ghada Elbez, Veit Hagenmeyer

The paper introduces CyberCertBench, a new benchmark suite for evaluating LLMs against industry cybersecurity certifications, finding that while frontier models perform well on general knowledge, thei…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

Towards Secure Logging: Characterizing and Benchmarking Logging Code Security Issues with LLMs

He Yang Yuan, Xin Wang, Kundi Yao, An Ran Chen +2 more

The paper characterizes logging code security issues and benchmarks LLMs, finding that while LLMs can moderately detect these issues, they struggle significantly with reliably generating correct code…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 22, 2026

Are Frontier LLMs Ready for Cybersecurity? Evidence for Vertical Foundation Models from Dual-Mode Vulnerability Benchmarks

Vivek Dahiya, Sunny Nehra, Vipul Dholariya, Bhavik Shangari +1 more

The paper evaluates frontier LLMs on cybersecurity tasks using dual-mode benchmarks and concludes that general-purpose models are insufficient, advocating for specialized, vertical foundation models.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 7, 2026

Attribution-Driven Explainable Intrusion Detection with Encoder-Based Large Language Models

Umesh Biswas, Shafqat Hasan, Syed Mohammed Farhan, Nisha Pillai +1 more

This paper introduces an attribution-driven analysis of encoder-based Large Language Models (LLMs) for network intrusion detection, demonstrating that the models make decisions based on meaningful tra…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 14, 2026

Talk is (Not) Cheap: A Taxonomy and Benchmark Coverage Audit for LLM Attacks

Karthik Raghu Iyer, Yazdan Jamshidi, Nicholas Bray, Alexey A. Shvets

The paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy and auditing framework to assess the collective coverage of existing LLM attack benchmarks, revealing significant and systematic gaps in current testing m…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

From Detection to Response: A Deep Learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Network Intrusion Mitigation

Md Navid Bin Islam, Sajal Saha, Senior Member

The paper introduces an end-to-end framework that not only detects network intrusions using deep learning but also generates actionable, citation-grounded mitigation reports using a Retrieval-Augmente…

View →