ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.24883v1· 20 results

cs.SEcs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safety

Xuan Chen, Lu Yan, Ruqi Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang

The paper introduces SafeAudit, a meta-audit framework that systematically enumerates test cases and uses a quantitative metric to uncover significant residual unsafe behaviors in LLM agents that exis…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 8, 2026

TraceSafe: A Systematic Assessment of LLM Guardrails on Multi-Step Tool-Calling Trajectories

Yen-Shan Chen, Sian-Yao Huang, Cheng-Lin Yang, Yun-Nung Chen

The paper introduces TraceSafe-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark, and finds that securing LLM agents requires jointly optimizing for structural reasoning and safety alignment to mitigate risks during m…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.OSRecentApr 18, 2026

Governed MCP: Kernel-Level Tool Governance for AI Agents via Logit-Based Safety Primitives

Daeyeon Son

The paper introduces Governed MCP, a kernel-resident gateway that enforces comprehensive, robust tool governance for AI agents' privileged tool calls, significantly improving safety beyond userspace m…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 12, 2026

Safety Context Injection: Inference-Time Safety Alignment via Static Filtering and Agentic Analysis

Zhenhao Xu, Wenhan Chang, Yichuan Chen, Yuxin Fang +2 more

The paper proposes Safety Context Injection (SCI), an inference-time framework that prepends a structured external risk report to protect Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) against sophisticated jailbreaks…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 31, 2026

SABER: Benchmarking Operational Safety of LLM Coding Agents in Stateful Project Workspaces

Qi Hu, Yifeng Tang, Qinghua Wang, Lanyang Zhao +6 more

The paper introduces SABER, a new benchmark that evaluates the operational safety of LLM coding agents in complex, stateful project environments, finding that current models have a high rate of harmfu…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 17, 2026

LPG: Balancing Efficiency and Policy Reasoning in Latent Policy Guardrails

Nanxi Li, Zhengyue Zhao, Chaowei Xiao

The paper introduces Latent Policy Guardrail (LPG), a novel framework that efficiently enforces dynamic safety policies for LLMs by compressing complex policy deliberation into a small set of latent t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 26, 2026

SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?

Hwiwon Lee, Jiawei Liu, Dongjun Kim, Ziqi Zhang +2 more

The paper introduces SEC-bench Pro, a rigorous benchmark for evaluating LLM-based bug hunting on complex software, finding that even advanced agents struggle with long-horizon security tasks.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use

Chenglin Yang

AgentTrust is a novel runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates AI agent tool calls before execution, achieving high accuracy in detecting unsafe actions across complex and obfuscated scenari…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning

Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen

The paper introduces COLAGUARD, a novel guardrail model that efficiently transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space, achieving state-of-the-art safety performance with massiv…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning

Siddharth Sai, Xiaofei Wen, Muhao Chen

The paper introduces COLAGUARD, a novel guardrail model that efficiently transfers multi-step safety reasoning into a continuous latent space, achieving high safety performance with massive improvemen…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 12, 2026

Verify Before You Fix: Agentic Execution Grounding for Trustworthy Cross-Language Code Analysis

Jugal Gajjar

The paper introduces an execution-grounded, cross-language framework that significantly improves the reliability of LLM-driven code vulnerability analysis by ensuring that all proposed fixes are confi…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

UK AISI Alignment Evaluation Case-Study

Alexandra Souly, Robert Kirk, Jacob Merizian, Abby D'Cruz +1 more

The study evaluated four frontier AI models to assess their reliability in following safety research goals, finding no confirmed instances of sabotage but noting that certain models frequently refuse…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 22, 2026

Breaking Bad: Interpretability-Based Safety Audits of State-of-the-Art LLMs

Krishiv Agarwal, Ramneet Kaur, Colin Samplawski, Manoj Acharya +5 more

The paper conducts an interpretability-driven safety audit of eight state-of-the-art LLMs, demonstrating that while interpretability-based steering is a powerful auditing tool, model robustness varies…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

Natural Language based Specification and Verification

Zhaorui Li, Chengyu Song

This paper proposes using large language models (LLMs) to generate and compositionally verify software implementations directly from natural language specifications, showing promising preliminary resu…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Diagnosing Live Within-Policy Instruction Conflicts in LLM Agents with Witnessed Resolution Profiles

Lu Yan, Xuan Chen, Xiangyu Zhang

The paper introduces WIRE, a pipeline for diagnosing live intra-policy rule conflicts in LLM agents by identifying and testing specific rule pairs within a single prompt policy that can co-govern a re…

View →
cs.CRcs.CVRecentMar 18, 2026

Toward Reliable, Safe, and Secure LLMs for Scientific Applications

Saket Sanjeev Chaturvedi, Joshua Bergerson, Tanwi Mallick

This paper addresses the critical need for trustworthy LLMs in science by proposing a comprehensive, multi-layered defense framework and methodology to evaluate unique scientific vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

When Safe Skills Collide: Measuring Compositional Risk in Agent Skill Ecosystems

Su Wang, Pin Qian, Yihang Chen, Junxian You +5 more

The paper introduces SkillReact, a framework that measures compositional risk in agent skill ecosystems, finding that even if individual skills are safe, their combination can create significant, unad…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 30, 2026

When Safe Skills Collide: Measuring Compositional Risk in Agent Skill Ecosystems

Su Wang, Pin Qian, Yihang Chen, Junxian You +5 more

The paper introduces SkillReact, a framework that measures compositional risk in agent skill ecosystems, finding that even if individual skills are safe, their combination can create significant, expl…

View →