ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.27922· 20 results

cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

HarnessForge: Joint Harness and Policy Evolution for Adaptive Agent Systems

Mingju Chen, Can Lv, Guibin Zhang, Heng Chang +1 more

HarnessForge introduces a meta-adaptive framework that jointly evolves the execution structure (harness) and the reasoning policy of LLM agents, significantly improving overall system performance acro…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 22, 2026

Synthesizing Multi-Agent Harnesses for Vulnerability Discovery

Hanzhi Liu, Chaofan Shou, Xiaonan Liu, Hongbo Wen +3 more

The paper introduces AgentFlow, a novel framework that uses a typed graph DSL and feedback-driven optimization to automatically synthesize and improve multi-agent harnesses for discovering security vu…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Adaptive Auto-Harness: Sustained Self-Improvement for Agentic System Deployment on Open-Ended Task Streams

Zewen Liu, Zhan Shi, Yisi Sang, Bing He +6 more

Adaptive Auto-Harness introduces a framework that enables LLM agents to sustain self-improvement and maintain high performance over open-ended, shifting task streams, outperforming existing fixed-benc…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 15, 2026

SafeHarness: Lifecycle-Integrated Security Architecture for LLM-based Agent Deployment

Xixun Lin, Yang Liu, Yancheng Chen, Yongxuan Wu +7 more

The paper introduces SafeHarness, a novel, lifecycle-integrated security architecture that significantly reduces unsafe behavior and attack success rates in LLM agents by weaving multiple defense laye…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Harness Updating Is Not Harness Benefit: Disentangling Evolution Capabilities in Self-Evolving LLM Agents

Minhua Lin, Juncheng Wu, Zijun Wang, Zhan Shi +13 more

The paper distinguishes between a model's ability to generate useful updates for external agent components (harness-updating) and its ability to benefit from those updates (harness-benefit), finding t…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

A Unified Framework for the Evaluation of LLM Agentic Capabilities

Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo +7 more

The paper introduces a unified framework to fairly evaluate LLM agentic capabilities by standardizing diverse benchmarks and separating the effects of the LLM model from the surrounding framework and…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store

Roxana Geambasu, Mariana Raykova, Pierre Tholoniat, Trishita Tiwari +2 more

The paper argues that current 'on-the-fly' AI agent design lacks necessary software engineering rigor and proposes an 'AI Workflow Store' to provide hardened, reusable, and reliable agent workflows.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 12, 2026

SkillSafetyBench: Evaluating Agent Safety under Skill-Facing Attack Surfaces

Chang Jin, An Wang, Zeming Wei, Kai Wang +6 more

The paper introduces SkillSafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark demonstrating that agent safety failures often stem from adversarial influences within reusable skills and execution environments, rath…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 11, 2026

LITMUS: Benchmarking Behavioral Jailbreaks of LLM Agents in Real OS Environments

Chiyu Zhang, Huiqin Yang, Bendong Jiang, Xiaolei Zhang +7 more

The paper introduces LITMUS, a novel benchmark that rigorously tests LLM agents for dangerous, physical-layer behavioral jailbreaks in real OS environments, revealing that current agents frequently ex…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 12, 2026

Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack

Hao Wang, Hanchen Li, Qiuyang Mang, Alvin Cheung +2 more

The paper introduces BenchJack, an automated red-teaming system that systematically audits popular AI agent benchmarks, revealing numerous reward-hacking exploits and demonstrating a method to signifi…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 9, 2026

When LLMs Team Up: A Coordinated Attack Framework for Automated Cyber Intrusions

Minfeng Qi, Tianqing Zhu, Zijie Xu, Congcong Zhu +2 more

The paper introduces CAESAR, a novel multi-agent framework that coordinates LLM agents across five specialized roles to improve success rates and stability in complex, multi-stage cyber intrusion task…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Tool Forge: A Validation-Carrying Toolchain for Governed Agentic Execution

Swanand Rao

Tool Forge is a validation-carrying toolchain that converts natural language capability intent into governed, sandbox-verified tool artifacts, significantly improving agent efficiency and reliability.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

"Skill issues'': data-centric optimization of lakehouse agents

Nicole Rose Schneider, Davide Ghilardi, Giacomo Piccinini, Jacopo Tagliabue

The paper introduces a data-centric optimization pipeline to improve coding agents' ability to interact with a branching lakehouse, showing significant accuracy gains by treating agent evaluation as a…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 13, 2026

ExploitBench: A Capability Ladder Benchmark for LLM Cybersecurity Agents

Seunghyun Lee, David Brumley

The paper introduces ExploitBench, a capability-graded benchmark that measures the progressive stages of exploitation, demonstrating that while current frontier models can easily trigger bugs, achievi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

LoopTrap: Termination Poisoning Attacks on LLM Agents

Huiyu Xu, Zhibo Wang, Wenhui Zhang, Ziqi Zhu +3 more

The paper introduces LoopTrap, an automated red-teaming framework that demonstrates how malicious prompts can poison the termination judgment of LLM agents, causing unbounded computation.

View →
cs.OScs.AIcs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

Agent libOS: A Library-OS-Inspired Runtime for Long-Running, Capability-Controlled LLM Agents

Yingqi Zhang

Agent libOS introduces a library-OS-inspired runtime substrate that treats LLM agents as schedulable processes, providing explicit capability control and robust auditing for long-running, stateful age…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 31, 2026

SABER: Benchmarking Operational Safety of LLM Coding Agents in Stateful Project Workspaces

Qi Hu, Yifeng Tang, Qinghua Wang, Lanyang Zhao +6 more

The paper introduces SABER, a new benchmark that evaluates the operational safety of LLM coding agents in complex, stateful project environments, finding that current models have a high rate of harmfu…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 24, 2026

Agent Audit: A Security Analysis System for LLM Agent Applications

Haiyue Zhang, Yi Nian, Yue Zhao

Agent Audit is a novel security analysis system that comprehensively audits LLM agent applications by examining the entire software stack—including tool code, configuration, and prompts—to detect a wi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 12, 2026

Cochise: A Reference Harness for Autonomous Penetration Testing

Andreas Happe, Jürgen Cito

The paper introduces Cochise, a minimal, reusable Python reference harness designed to standardize and simplify autonomous penetration testing experiments for comparing different LLM-driven agent arch…

View →