ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.29234· 18 results

cs.DLcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

Verified Misguidance: Measuring Structural Citation Failures in Search-Augmented LLMs

Yongsik Seo, Wooseok Jeong, Eunyoung Kim, Hyeonseo Jang +1 more

The paper introduces CITETRACE, a large-scale dataset and evaluation framework that systematically measures structural citation failures in search-augmented LLMs, revealing a pattern called Verified M…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

DeepSurvey: Enhancing Analytical Depth and Citation Reliability in Automated Survey Generation

Ziyue Yang, Da Ma, Hanqi Li, Zijian Wang +7 more

DeepSurvey is an agentic system that significantly enhances automated survey generation by extracting deep, structured knowledge from full-text papers and rigorously validating citations, achieving su…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

LiveBrowseComp: Are Search Agents Searching, or Just Verifying What They Already Know?

HuiMing Fan, Xiao Wang, Zheng Chu, Qianyu Wang +4 more

The paper argues that current search agents often verify existing knowledge rather than genuinely searching, and introduces LiveBrowseComp, a new benchmark to measure true evidence-driven discovery.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

AI for Monitoring and Classifying Data Used in Research Literature

Rafael Macalaba, Aivin V. Solatorio

The paper introduces a novel, scalable framework to monitor and classify dataset usage within research literature, addressing the current lack of infrastructure for tracking data citations.

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Reading Between the Citations: A Typed Claim Network for Scientific Literature

Ning Ding, Sergio J. Rodríguez Méndez, Pouya G. Omran

The paper introduces a typed claim network that models cross-document references by explicitly labeling the stance (e.g., agreement, disagreement) of a citation, significantly improving downstream tas…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 2, 2026

Re-Ranking Through an Attribution Lens for Citation Quality in Legal QA

Mohamed Hesham Elganayni, Selim Saleh

The paper introduces a cross-encoder re-ranker trained on attribution scores to improve the retrieval of highly relevant citation passages for legal question answering, outperforming standard semantic…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing

Krzysztof Żurawicki, Julia Farganus, Arkadiusz Gaweł, Mateusz Bystroński +1 more

The paper introduces PRAIB, a benchmark that demonstrates that LLM-generated peer reviews, while often verbose, systematically diverge from human norms by being less variable, positively biased, and f…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 4, 2026

Operation-Guided Progressive Human-to-AI Text Transformation Benchmark for Multi-Granularity AI-Text Detection

Sondos Mahmoud Bsharat, Jiacheng Liu, Xiaohan Zhao, Tianjun Yao +8 more

The paper introduces OpAI-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to study how AI authorship signals evolve and accumulate during the progressive co-editing process between humans and AI.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

RAISE: RAG Design as an Architecture Search Problem

Zhen Chen, Yibing Liu, Weihao Xie, Yu Liang +2 more

The paper proposes formulating RAG design as an architecture search problem and introduces RAISE, a comprehensive framework and benchmark for systematically optimizing RAG hyperparameters.

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMay 27, 2026

Whose Name Comes Up? III: Persona Prompting Effects in LLM-Based Scholar Recommendation

Annabella Sánchez-Guzmán, Lukas Eberhard, Denis Helic, Lisette Espín-Noboa

The paper proposes a comprehensive benchmark to systematically audit how varying persona prompts and model choices affect the technical quality and social representativeness of scholar recommendations…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

ProjectionBench: Evaluating Scientific Hypothesis Generation in LLMs Under Progressive Information Disclosure

A. J. Lew, Y. Cao, M. J. Buehler

The paper introduces ProjectionBench, a novel benchmark that progressively discloses information to evaluate LLMs' ability to generate scientific hypotheses, demonstrating that advanced models like GP…

View →
cs.CLcs.DLRecentMay 30, 2026

Citation Grounding: Detecting and Reducing LLM Citation Hallucinations via Legal Citation Graphs

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Citation Grounding (CG), a novel metric and framework, to systematically detect and reduce the hallucination of legal citations by verifying LLM outputs against a massive, structu…

View →
cs.IREmpiricalRecentJun 10, 2026

CompRank: Efficient LLM Reranking via Token-Level Compression and Decoding-Free Scoring

Xuan Lu, Haohang Huang, Yingqi Fan, Junlong Tong +4 more

This paper proposes CompRank, a token-efficient reranking framework for large language models that reduces redundant computation and achieves strong reranking performance.

View →
cs.CERecentJun 1, 2026

Are Economists Open to AI? Text as Data as Survey on Professional Sentiment and Academic Research Trends

Yi Wang, Lei Ge

The paper introduces TaDaS, a framework that analyzes large-scale text archives to measure professional sentiment, finding that while AI discussion among economists is initially negative, the trend sh…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Critic-R: Improving Agentic Search using Instruction-tuned Retrievers with Natural Language Introspective Feedback

Md Zarif Ul Alam, Alireza Salemi, Hamed Zamani

Critic-R introduces a novel framework that uses a critic model to provide natural language introspective feedback, significantly improving the performance of agentic search systems by optimizing retri…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Relevant Is Not Warranted: Evidence-Force Calibration for Cited RAG

Pin Qian, Su Wang, Xiaoyuan Wang, Yihang Chen +6 more

The paper introduces FORCEBENCH, a new stress test designed to evaluate whether cited sources genuinely warrant the strength of a claim, revealing that standard citation evaluation methods often fail…

View →
cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 28, 2026

Xetrieval: Mechanistically Explaining Dense Retrieval

Zhixin Cai, Jun Bai, Yang Liu, Jiaqi Li +6 more

Xetrieval introduces an embedding-level framework to mechanistically explain dense retrieval decisions by decomposing high-dimensional embeddings into sparse, human-interpretable features.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Towards Verifiable Multimodal Deep Research: A Multi-Agent Harness for Interleaved Report Generation

Chenghao Zhang, Guanting Dong, Yufan Liu, Tong Zhao +1 more

The paper introduces extsc{Ptah}, a multi-agent harness designed to improve verifiable multimodal deep research by orchestrating the entire report generation process, ensuring factual grounding and v…

View →