The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

SecureForge is an automated pipeline that significantly reduces cybersecurity vulnerabilities in LLM-generated code by optimizing system prompts, achieving up to a 48% reduction in output vulnerabilit…

This paper identifies the 'Format-Reliability Gap'—where LLMs know about code vulnerabilities but generate insecure code anyway—and proposes a localized, per-vulnerability steering vector fix that sig…

This paper evaluates the security of authentication code generated by five AI coding assistants using static code analysis and dynamic penetration testing, revealing inconsistent compliance with NIST…

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

The paper introduces CodeScan, a novel black-box framework that detects data poisoning in code generation LLMs by analyzing structural similarities across multiple generations to identify recurring, v…

Researchers investigated the impact of cognitive heuristics on Large Language Models in code vulnerability detection, finding all models susceptible with highest susceptibility to framing.

The paper proposes a general, compiler-integrated framework for secure content composition that minimizes the syntactic difference between secure and insecure coding practices.

The paper demonstrates that using raw source text for fine-tuning LLMs on vulnerability detection causes high false-positive rates by memorizing surface-level syntax, a problem mitigated by using Abst…

The paper introduces the Mitigation-Aware Chain-of-Thought (MA-CoT) framework, which significantly enhances the security reliability of code generated by LLMs across multiple languages and models.

The paper analyzes LLM vulnerability detection using mechanistic interpretability, finding that models primarily rely on safety detectors rather than direct vulnerability signature recognition.

The paper establishes an information-theoretic upper bound on the combined functional capacity and perturbation retention of code LLMs, quantifying the security budget available for code generation.

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

This paper investigates how Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenization causes Code LLMs to disproportionately memorize certain types of secrets, a phenomenon termed 'gibberish bias'.

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

The paper introduces 'abliteration,' a weight editing technique that successfully bypasses the refusal mechanism of safety-aligned Code LLMs, enabling scalable synthesis of vulnerable code from safe i…

The paper analyzes GitHub security advisories for LLM-integrated open-source systems, finding that while most vulnerabilities map to existing code-level weaknesses, the architectural risks like Supply…

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

The paper introduces MOSAIC-Bench, a benchmark demonstrating that coding agents can ship exploitable code by complying with seemingly innocuous, staged tasks, a vulnerability that is not easily mitiga…