ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.31099· 20 results

cs.IRcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Evaluating Factual Density in Multi-Source RAG: A Study in Medical AI Accuracy

Michael R. DeMarco

The paper introduces Factual Density (FD*), a novel retrieval signal that measures the proportion of verified facts, demonstrating that optimizing RAG retrieval based on this density significantly imp…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

ProjectionBench: Evaluating Scientific Hypothesis Generation in LLMs Under Progressive Information Disclosure

A. J. Lew, Y. Cao, M. J. Buehler

The paper introduces ProjectionBench, a novel benchmark that progressively discloses information to evaluate LLMs' ability to generate scientific hypotheses, demonstrating that advanced models like GP…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

LiveBrowseComp: Are Search Agents Searching, or Just Verifying What They Already Know?

HuiMing Fan, Xiao Wang, Zheng Chu, Qianyu Wang +4 more

The paper argues that current search agents often verify existing knowledge rather than genuinely searching, and introduces LiveBrowseComp, a new benchmark to measure true evidence-driven discovery.

View →
cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 28, 2026

Rethinking Literature Search Evaluation: Deep Research Helps, and Human Citation Lists Are Not a Ground Truth

Gaurav Sahu, Laurent Charlin, Christopher Pal

The paper introduces a Deep Research pipeline that significantly improves literature search recall and demonstrates that human-curated citation lists are often unreliable and do not serve as a true gr…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Knowledge-Intensive Video Generation

Chenxu Wang, Mingda Chen

The paper introduces Knowledge-Intensive Video Generation (KIVI) as a challenging benchmark for evaluating video models on factuality and practical usefulness, showing that current state-of-the-art sy…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Reading Between the Citations: A Typed Claim Network for Scientific Literature

Ning Ding, Sergio J. Rodríguez Méndez, Pouya G. Omran

The paper introduces a typed claim network that models cross-document references by explicitly labeling the stance (e.g., agreement, disagreement) of a citation, significantly improving downstream tas…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Ryze: Evidence-Enriched Data Synthesis from Biomedical Papers

Yeqi Huang, Yue Chen, Yanwei Ye, Guanhao Su +1 more

The paper introduces Ryze, an automated system that synthesizes evidence-enriched Question-Answering (QA) pairs from raw biomedical papers, resulting in a specialized VLM (BioVLM-8B) that significantl…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

I-WebGenBench : Evaluating Interactivity in LLM-Generated Scientific Web Applications

Dasen Dai, Biao Wu, Meng Fang, Shuoqi Li +1 more

The paper introduces I-WebGenBench, a framework and benchmark that converts static scientific papers into executable, interactive web systems, allowing users to dynamically explore the paper's mechani…

View →
cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 27, 2026

From Learning Resources to Competencies: LLM-Based Tagging with Evidence and Graph Constraints

Ngoc Luyen Le, Marie-Hélène Abel, Bertrand Laforge

The paper introduces an LLM-based pipeline that tags learning resources with structured competencies, achieving strong performance while providing traceable evidence and leveraging graph constraints.

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMay 27, 2026

Whose Name Comes Up? III: Persona Prompting Effects in LLM-Based Scholar Recommendation

Annabella Sánchez-Guzmán, Lukas Eberhard, Denis Helic, Lisette Espín-Noboa

The paper proposes a comprehensive benchmark to systematically audit how varying persona prompts and model choices affect the technical quality and social representativeness of scholar recommendations…

View →
cs.CLcs.IRRecentJun 2, 2026

Re-Ranking Through an Attribution Lens for Citation Quality in Legal QA

Mohamed Hesham Elganayni, Selim Saleh

The paper introduces a cross-encoder re-ranker trained on attribution scores to improve the retrieval of highly relevant citation passages for legal question answering, outperforming standard semantic…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

EvoGens: A Population-Based Heuristic Search Framework for Scientific Idea Generation

Xu Li, Hanzhe Tu, Xinyi Li, Kuncheng Zhao +2 more

EvoGens is an evolution-inspired framework that treats scientific idea generation as an evolutionary search, significantly boosting the novelty and diversity of generated research ideas compared to ex…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

DeepSurvey: Enhancing Analytical Depth and Citation Reliability in Automated Survey Generation

Ziyue Yang, Da Ma, Hanqi Li, Zijian Wang +7 more

DeepSurvey is an agentic system that significantly enhances automated survey generation by extracting deep, structured knowledge from full-text papers and rigorously validating citations, achieving su…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

AI for Monitoring and Classifying Data Used in Research Literature

Rafael Macalaba, Aivin V. Solatorio

The paper introduces a novel, scalable framework to monitor and classify dataset usage within research literature, addressing the current lack of infrastructure for tracking data citations.

View →
cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

On the impact of retrieved content representations in RAG Pipelines

Jonathan J Ross, Bevan Koopman, Anton van der Vegt, Guido Zuccon

The paper systematically compares multiple content representations for RAG pipelines and finds that answer retention—the ability of the representation to preserve the original answer-bearing content—i…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing

Krzysztof Żurawicki, Julia Farganus, Arkadiusz Gaweł, Mateusz Bystroński +1 more

The paper introduces PRAIB, a benchmark that demonstrates that LLM-generated peer reviews, while often verbose, systematically diverge from human norms by being less variable, positively biased, and f…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

Teddy Ferdinan, Bartłomiej Koptyra, Mikołaj Langner, Tomasz Adamczyk +41 more

This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of Reasoning Language Model (RLM) adoption across 28 scientific disciplines, revealing significant disparities in RLM maturity across different scientific…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

TSM-Bench: Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Real-World Wikipedia Editing Practices

Gerrit Quaremba, Elizabeth Black, Denny Vrandečić, Elena Simperl

The paper introduces TSM-Bench, a new benchmark that demonstrates existing LLM-generated text detectors fail to accurately identify task-specific machine-generated content found in real-world Wikipedi…

View →