ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.00975· 20 results

cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Inform, Coach, Relate, Listen: Auditing LLM Caregiving Support Roles

Drishti Goel, Agam Goyal, Veda Duddu, Olivia Pal +7 more

This study demonstrates that an LLM's assigned support role (e.g., Inform, Coach, Relate) significantly alters its safety profile and the types of risks it presents when assisting users in complex car…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Food Noise & False Safety: A Systematic Evaluation of How LLMs Fail to Adapt to Eating Disorder Queries with Clinician Feedback

Giulia Pucci, Emily Hemendinger, Ruizhe Li, Gavin Abercrombie +2 more

This paper systematically evaluates how LLMs uncritically adapt to potentially dangerous user prompts related to eating disorders, finding that specific linguistic cues significantly increase the like…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback

Jiwon Kim, Maya Ajit, Sherry Gong, Soorya Ram Shimgekar +3 more

The paper introduces LLUMI, an open-source framework that improves LLM writing assistance for mental health support using community feedback, demonstrating comparable performance to proprietary models…

View →
cs.AIcs.CYq-fin.RMRecentMay 27, 2026

The Ethics of LLM Sandbox and Persona Dynamics

Tim Gebbie, Stewart Gebbie

The paper argues that LLM guardrails and persona dynamics create an unethical 'reality gap' by laundering epistemic risk onto users, advocating for task-level causal requirements over response-level m…

View →
cs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 30, 2026

Towards Lightweight Reliability: Using Soft Prompts for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models

S M Tahmid Siddiqui, Akib Jawad Ononto, Anoop Singhal, Latifur Khan

The paper introduces Responsible Contrastive Soft Prompting (RCSP), a parameter-efficient method using soft prompts to improve LLM reliability by simultaneously suppressing hallucinations, encouraging…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

When Are LLM Inferences Acceptable? User Reactions and Control Preferences for Inferred Personal Information

Kyzyl Monteiro, Minjung Park, Alexander Ioffrida, Angelina Sanna +5 more

This study investigated user reactions to inferred personal information from their own ChatGPT histories, finding that acceptability is governed by context-sensitive norms regarding generation, retent…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 4, 2026

Steering LLM Viewpoints through Fabricated Evidence Injection

Xi Yang, Chang Liu, Zhenglin Huang, Haoran Li +3 more

This paper introduces Ghostwriter, an attack framework demonstrating that LLMs are highly vulnerable to adopting misleading viewpoints when provided with fabricated, yet credible-looking, evidence.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYRecentMay 29, 2026

Toxic HallucinAItions: Perturbing Prompts and Tracing LLM Circuits

Soorya Ram Shimgekar, Agam Goyal, Amruta Parulekar, Joshua Chen +5 more

The paper demonstrates that increasing the toxicity of prompts significantly degrades the factual reliability of LLMs, a degradation linked to the selective amplification of perturbation-sensitive nod…

View →
cs.CLcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Investigating and Alleviating Harm Amplification in LLM Interactions

Ruohao Guo, Wei Xu, Alan Ritter

This paper introduces HarmAmp, a new benchmark for multi-turn harm amplification, and proposes TrajSafe, a proactive monitoring system that significantly reduces harmfulness in LLM interactions while…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCRecentMay 28, 2026

EUDAIMONIA: Evaluating Undesirable Dynamics in AI

Jun Rui Huang, Wang Bill Zhu, Ziyi Liu, Nathanael Fast +2 more

The paper introduces EUDAIMONIA, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating how well LLMs align with user welfare in social interactions, finding that even state-of-the-art models frequently violate…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Med-HEAL: Analyzing and Mitigating Hallucinations in Medical LLMs with Hallucination-Aware In-Context Learning

Yiming Liao, Zeno Franco, Jose Eduardo Lizarraga Mazaba, Keke Chen

The paper introduces Med-HEAL, a comprehensive framework and dataset for systematically identifying and mitigating hallucinations in medical LLMs, demonstrating that a self-critique pipeline significa…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

DECK: A Consistency x Confidence Taxonomy of LLM Hallucinations

Mohit Singh Chauhan

The paper introduces the DECK taxonomy, a novel framework that classifies LLM hallucinations not by their content error, but by their detectability signature based on inter-sample consistency and toke…

View →
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

When Understanding Becomes a Risk: Authenticity and Safety Risks in the Emerging Image Generation Paradigm

Ye Leng, Junjie Chu, Mingjie Li, Chenhao Lin +4 more

The paper analyzes that while multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer superior semantic understanding for image generation, this enhanced capability significantly increases safety risks, partic…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Think Fast, Talk Smart: Partitioning Deterministic and Neural Computation for Structured Health Text Generation

Kai-Chen Cheng, Haejun Han, David Q. Sun

The paper proposes 'Think Fast, Talk Smart,' a pipeline that separates deterministic data analysis from LLM generation, showing that offloading recurring, structured tasks to code significantly improv…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

SuiChat-CN: Benchmarking Contextual Suicide Risk Assessment in Chinese Group Chats

Xiangyu Wang, Zhiwei Yu, Chengze Du, Dingchang Wang +2 more

The paper introduces SuiChat-CN, a novel Chinese group-chat benchmark for contextual suicide risk assessment, demonstrating that multi-party conversational context is crucial for accurate detection.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

Safety Geometry Collapse in Multimodal LLMs and Adaptive Drift Correction

Jiahe Guo, Xiangran Guo, Jiaxuan Chen, Weixiang Zhao +5 more

This paper introduces the concept of Safety Geometry Collapse, demonstrating that multimodal inputs degrade the safety separation of LLMs, and proposes ReGap, a training-free method that adaptively co…

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentApr 29, 2026

Fidelity, Diversity, and Privacy: A Multi-Dimensional LLM Evaluation for Clinical Data Augmentation

Guillermo Iglesias, Gema Bello-Orgaz, María Navas-Loro, Cristian Ramirez-Atencia +2 more

This paper evaluates multiple LLMs (DeepSeek-R1, OpenBioLLM-Llama3, Qwen 3.5) for generating privacy-safe, high-quality synthetic mental health reports, demonstrating their effectiveness in expanding…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 5, 2026

FreakOut-LLM: The Effect of Emotional Stimuli on Safety Alignment

Daniel Kuznetsov, Ofir Cohen, Karin Shistik, Rami Puzis +1 more

This paper introduces FreakOut-LLM, demonstrating that emotional context, specifically stress, significantly compromises the safety alignment of large language models, increasing jailbreak susceptibil…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Same Patient, Different Words, Different Diagnosis? Evaluating Semantic Stability in Clinical LLMs

Mahdi Alkaeed, Adnan Qayyum, Nabeel Abo Kashreef, Muhammad Bilal +1 more

The paper evaluates the semantic stability of clinical LLMs to linguistic variations, finding that domain specialization does not guarantee consistent robustness improvements.

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

RealityTest: How People Probe AI Identity and Whether Models Disclose It

Anna Gausen, Sarenne Wallbridge, Bessie O'Dell, Christopher Summerfield +1 more

RealityTest introduces a large-scale, multimodal, and multilingual benchmark using real-world human data to test how AI systems disclose their identity, finding that context and phrasing are more crit…

View →