ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.03969· 20 results

cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Human-Alignment, Calibration, and Activation Patterns in Large Language Model Uncertainty

Kyle Moore, Jesse Roberts, Daryl Watson, William Ward +1 more

This paper investigates whether large language models exhibit uncertainty signals similar to human judgment, examining both overt behavior and internal activation patterns to assess alignment and cali…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

The Confidence Shortcut: A Reasoning Failure Mode of Masked Diffusion Models

Dueun Kim, Albert No

The paper argues that using confidence-based decoding, which is optimized via training mask alignment, fundamentally misaligns Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs) from the logical flow needed for complex r…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Confidence-Orchestrated Self-Evolution against Uncertain LLM Feedback

Bowen Wei, Nan Wang, Yuqing Zhou, Jinhao Pan +1 more

The paper proposes COSE, a method that uses an LLM's intrinsic confidence as an uncertainty signal to improve self-evolutionary training, achieving state-of-the-art performance on general reasoning an…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 27, 2026

The Importance of Being Statistically Earnest: A Critical Re-evaluation of GSM-Symbolic

Dominika Agnieszka Długosz, Arlindo Oliveira, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez

The paper challenges the conclusion that LLMs lack reasoning by demonstrating that reported performance drops on GSM-Symbolic are often statistically weak and partially attributable to dataset biases,…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

An Enigma of Artificial Reason: Investigating the Production-Evaluation Gap in Large Reasoning Models

Mingzhong Sun, Teresa Yeo, Armando Solar-Lezama, Tan Zhi-Xuan

This paper investigates the production-evaluation gap in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that while LRMs excel at generating solutions, they struggle significantly to evaluate flawed reasoning,…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

Shared Doubt: Zero-shot Cross-Lingual Confidence Estimation for Language Models

Athina Kyriakou, Dennis Ulmer, Ivan Titov

The paper proposes a zero-shot cross-lingual method to estimate language model confidence by training a lightweight linear probe on one language and applying it directly to unseen, typologically diver…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Identifying High-Confidence Social Biases in LLMs for Trustworthy Conversational Tutoring Agents

Aitor Arronte Alvarez, Naiyi Xie Fincham

This study evaluates LLMs in conversational tutoring to identify high-confidence social biases, finding that state-of-the-art models are often overconfident in their incorrect assessments of stereotyp…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

When Should Models Change Their Minds? Contextual Belief Management in Large Language Models

Haoming Xu, Weihong Xu, Zongrui Li, Mengru Wang +5 more

The paper introduces Contextual Belief Management (CBM) to address how LLMs should manage accumulating information over long interactions, showing that reinforcement learning significantly improves be…

View →
cs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 30, 2026

Towards Lightweight Reliability: Using Soft Prompts for Hallucination Mitigation in Large Language Models

S M Tahmid Siddiqui, Akib Jawad Ononto, Anoop Singhal, Latifur Khan

The paper introduces Responsible Contrastive Soft Prompting (RCSP), a parameter-efficient method using soft prompts to improve LLM reliability by simultaneously suppressing hallucinations, encouraging…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Off-the-Shelf LLMs as Process Scorers: Training-Free Alternative to PRMs for Mathematical Reasoning

Atoosa Chegini, Soheil Feizi

The paper introduces Chunk-Level Guided Generation, a training-free method that uses an off-the-shelf large language model (LLM) as a process scorer to guide small model generation, achieving performa…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

DECK: A Consistency x Confidence Taxonomy of LLM Hallucinations

Mohit Singh Chauhan

The paper introduces the DECK taxonomy, a novel framework that classifies LLM hallucinations not by their content error, but by their detectability signature based on inter-sample consistency and toke…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Integrated and Cross-Architecture Interpretation of LLM Reasoning

Leonardo Matthew Yauw, Wei-Bin Kou, Yujiu Yang

The paper introduces an Integrated, cross-Architecture Reasoning (IAR) framework to provide a unified and robust method for interpreting the opaque reasoning processes within Large Language Models.

View →
cs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 9, 2026

BiAxisAudit: A Novel Framework to Evaluate LLM Bias Across Prompt Sensitivity and Response-Layer Divergence

Jialing Gan, Junhao Dong, Songze Li

The paper introduces BiAxisAudit, a novel framework that evaluates LLM bias by analyzing bias scores across multiple prompt formats and within the internal inconsistency of model responses, revealing…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

OCC-RAG: Optimal Cognitive Core for Faithful Question Answering

Maksim Savkin, Mikhail Goncharov, Alexander Gambashidze, Alla Chepurova +6 more

The paper introduces OCC-RAG, a family of compact, task-specialized Small Language Models (SLMs) designed to achieve highly faithful, multi-hop question answering grounded strictly in provided context…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

Not All Flips Are Conformity: Decomposing Stance Convergence in Multi-Agent LLM Debate

Xiqi Hao, Zengqing Wu, Yu-Xuan Qiu, Chuan Xiao +3 more

The paper decomposes LLM debate convergence into three mechanisms (instability, conformity, persuasion) and finds that much observed convergence is harmful social compliance rather than genuine reason…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Faithful Agentic XAI: A Verification Method and an Open-World Benchmark for Better Model Faithfulness

Jaechang Kim, Sunung Mun, Seungjoon Lee, Jaewoong Cho +1 more

The paper proposes Faithful Agentic XAI (FAX), a verification framework that explicitly checks LLM-generated explanations against model behavior, significantly improving explanation faithfulness on a…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

TRACE: Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements for LLM CoT Evaluation

Yundong Kim, Heyoung Yang

The paper introduces TRACE, a novel metric that evaluates the logical structure of LLM reasoning (CoT) by integrating Toulmin's argumentation theory, demonstrating that sound reasoning structure corre…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 23, 2026

Evaluating the Reliability and Fidelity of Automated Judgment Systems of Large Language Models

Tom Biskupski, Stephan Kleber

This paper evaluates the reliability of using Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated judges to assess the quality of other LLMs, finding a high correlation with human judgment when suitable prompts…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Unlocking Fine-Grained Translation Quality Estimation in LRMs through Synergistically Evolving Implicit and Explicit Reasoning

Renfei Dang, Xinye Wang, Zhejian Lai, Weilu Xu +4 more

The paper proposes RIEQE, a two-stage training framework that synergistically co-evolves implicit and explicit reasoning capabilities in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) to significantly improve fine-gra…

View →
cs.CLcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Unveiling the Entropy Dynamics of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Ting Xu, Xu He, Yupu Lu, Jiankai Sun +3 more

The paper analyzes the entropy dynamics of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, identifying a transition from an exploratory Uncertainty Region to a stable Confidence Region, which enables superior early…

View →