ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.13832· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGcs.MARecentApr 6, 2026

Explainable Autonomous Cyber Defense using Adversarial Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Yiyao Zhang, Diksha Goel, Hussain Ahmad

The paper introduces C-MADF, a causally constrained multi-agent framework that significantly reduces false positives in autonomous cyber defense by restricting response actions to structurally consist…

View →
cs.LGcs.MAEmpiricalRecentJun 12, 2026

Contract-Based Compositional Shielding for Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Omar Adalat, Edwin Hamel-De le Court, Francesco Belardinelli

This paper proposes a method for ensuring safety in multi-agent reinforce learning through decentralized execution, using a shared global specification and a non-stationary multi-armed bandit.

View →
cs.MAcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Safe Equilibrium Policy Optimization for Strategic Agent Policies

Karthika Arumugam, Kiran Kumar Manku, Amit Dhanda

The paper introduces Safe Equilibrium Policy Optimization (σepo{}) to train language models for multi-agent strategic tasks, achieving improved safety and robustness across various game domains.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 10, 2026

Operationalizing Cybersecurity Governance for Mitigation Planning with Attack-Path Modeling and Reinforcement Learning

Philip Huff, Dakota Dale, Harshith Guduru, Rohan Singh +1 more

The paper proposes a system that operationalizes cybersecurity governance frameworks by integrating them with attack-path modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning to generate practical, resource-const…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Multi-Agent LLM Governance for Safe Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning in SDN-IoT Defense

Saeid Jamshidi, Negar Shahabi, Foutse Khomh, Carol Fung +1 more

The paper proposes a two-timescale governance framework using a multi-agent LLM to safely update and guide RL agents for SDN-IoT defense, significantly improving performance and stability under advers…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Coordination Graphs for Constrained Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Santiago Amaya-Corredor, Miguel Calvo-Fullana, Anders Jonsson

The paper introduces Coordination Graphs for Constrained Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (CG-CMARL), a scalable framework that decomposes complex joint action spaces into pairwise regions to handle…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

PropGuard: Safeguarding LLM-MAS via Propagation-Aware Exploration and Remediation

Bingyu Yan, Xiaoming Zhang, Jinyu Hou, Chaozhuo Li +3 more

PropGuard introduces a propagation-aware framework to safeguard LLM-MAS against malicious attacks by constructing a dual-view graph, identifying suspicious propagation paths, and applying source-guide…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 12, 2026

A Queueing-Theoretic Framework for Dynamic Attack Surfaces: Data-Integrated Risk Analysis and Adaptive Defense

Jihyeon Yun, Abdullah Yasin Etcibasi, Ming Shi, C. Emre Koksal

The paper introduces a queueing-theoretic framework to model dynamic cyber-attack surfaces, developing an adaptive reinforcement learning defense policy that significantly reduces active vulnerabiliti…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

EMBGuard: Constructing Hazard-Aware Guardrails for Safe Planning in Embodied Agents

Dongwook Choi, Taeyoon Kwon, Bogyung Jeong, Minju Kim +5 more

EMBGuard introduces a novel, MLLM-based safety guardrail that explicitly identifies and explains physical hazards from (visual observation, action) pairs, enabling safer planning for embodied agents.

View →
cs.AIcs.LGcs.LORecentMay 29, 2026

Robust Shielding for Safe Reinforcement Learning

Edwin Hamel-De le Court, Thom Badings, Alessandro Abate, Francesco Belardinelli +1 more

The paper introduces a novel shielding framework for Robust MDPs (RMDPs) that guarantees safety under worst-case transition probabilities, enabling safe reinforcement learning even when transition dyn…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 1, 2026

Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent LLM-Based Security Pattern Selection for IoT Systems

Saeid Jamshidi, Foutse Khomh, Carol Fung, Kawser Wazed Nafi

The paper introduces ASPO, a self-adaptive multi-agent system that uses LLM-based reasoning combined with deterministic optimization to select conflict-free and resource-feasible security mitigation p…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYRecentJun 1, 2026

SafeMCP: Proactive Power Regulation for LLM Agent Defense via Environment-Grounded Look-Ahead Reasoning

Lichao Wang, Zhaoxing Ren, Tianzhuo Yang, Jiaming Ji +3 more

SafeMCP is a server-side defense plugin that uses look-ahead reasoning to proactively filter and constrain tool acquisition for LLM agents, thereby mitigating catastrophic risks associated with expand…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

GRID: Graph Representation of Intelligence Data for Security Text Knowledge Graph Construction

Liangyi Huang, Zichen Liu, Fei Shao, Shang Ma +4 more

The paper introduces GRID, an end-to-end framework that significantly improves the construction of security knowledge graphs from cyber threat intelligence by replacing unstable LLM-based supervision…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 2, 2026

Toward a Principled Framework for Agent Safety Measurement

Shuyi Lin, Anshuman Suri, Alina Oprea, Cheng Tan

The paper introduces BOA, a novel framework that measures agent safety by exhaustively searching the entire in-budget trajectory space, thereby identifying unsafe behaviors missed by traditional sampl…

View →
cs.AIcs.CReess.SYRecentMay 4, 2026

Stable Agentic Control: Tool-Mediated LLM Architecture for Autonomous Cyber Defense

Kerri Prinos, Lilianne Brush, Cameron Denton, Zhanqi Wang +4 more

The paper proposes a tool-mediated LLM architecture for autonomous cyber defense, formally proving its stability and demonstrating that it significantly reduces an attacker's expected payoff in real-w…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 9, 2026

Building Better Environments for Autonomous Cyber Defence

Chris Hicks, Elizabeth Bates, Shae McFadden, Isaac Symes Thompson +11 more

This paper synthesizes expert knowledge from a workshop to provide a comprehensive framework and best-practice guidelines for developing high-quality reinforcement learning environments for autonomous…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 20, 2026

ARES: Adaptive Red-Teaming and End-to-End Repair of Policy-Reward System

Jiacheng Liang, Yao Ma, Tharindu Kumarage, Satyapriya Krishna +4 more

ARES is a novel framework that systematically discovers and mitigates dual vulnerabilities in RLHF systems by simultaneously testing the core LLM and its Reward Model (RM) using structured adversarial…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Security Is Relative: Training-Free Vulnerability Detection via Multi-Agent Behavioral Contract Synthesis

Yongchao Wang, Zhiqiu Huang

The paper introduces Phoenix, a training-free multi-agent framework that detects code vulnerabilities by synthesizing project-specific behavioral contracts, significantly outperforming existing method…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

Redefining AI Red Teaming in the Agentic Era: From Weeks to Hours

Raja Sekhar Rao Dheekonda, Will Pearce, Nick Landers

The paper introduces an AI red teaming agent that drastically reduces the time and effort required for security testing by allowing operators to define complex attack goals using natural language, com…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

Send a SCOUT First: Pre-hoc Reasoning for Adaptive Detector Allocation in Prompt-Injection Defense

Shuhao Zhang, Jiarui Li, Qi Cao, Ruiyi Zhang +1 more

The paper introduces SCOUT, a dynamic detector allocation framework that improves prompt-injection defense by predicting detector reliability and latency to optimize the trade-off between safety and o…

View →