ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2607.03316· 20 results

cs.SEcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

3100 Opinions on Code Review in an AI World: Building Causal Theory from Practitioner Discourse

Shyam Agarwal, Courtney Miller, Christian Kästner, Bogdan Vasilescu

This paper synthesizes practitioner discourse at scale to build a causal model explaining the impact of AI on code review, recovering mechanisms behind observed trends.

View →
cs.SEPositionRecentJul 24, 2026

Code Review is a Conversation: Toward Conversational AI Review Assistants

Rosalia Tufano

This paper proposes conversational AI review assistants for code review, systems that engage in conversation with developers instead of just generating comments.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CYEmpiricalRecentJul 15, 2026

Early Adoption of Agentic Coding Tools by GitHub Projects

Maliha Noushin Raida, Daqing Hou

This paper analyzes 25,264 agentic pull requests from 2,361 GitHub repositories to investigate adoption, productivity, and collaboration patterns of agentic coding tools.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 16, 2026

All Smoke, No Alarm: Oracle Signals in Agent-Authored Test Code

Dipayan Banik, Kowshik Chowdhury, Shazibul Islam Shamim

This paper characterizes oracle signals in test files of agent-authored pull requests and assesses their impact on merge outcomes.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Code-QA-Bench: Separating Code Reasoning from Documentation Memorization in Repository-Level QA

Jun Zhang, JianYing Qu, Hanwen Du, Zhongkai Sun +2 more

The paper introduces Code-QA-Bench, a novel framework that rigorously separates genuine code reasoning from mere documentation memorization in repository-level code understanding benchmarks.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.HCRecentMay 28, 2026

How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions

Ningzhi Tang, Chaoran Chen, Gelei Xu, Yiyu Shi +4 more

This study analyzes over 20,000 real-world coding sessions to show that AI coding agents frequently fail users through subtle misalignment, requiring constant manual correction even when major system…

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

What Makes a Good Bug Report for an AI Agent?

Lara Khatib, Noble Saji Mathews, Meiyappan Nagappan, Pengyu Nie +1 more

This paper investigates the relationship between bug report features and repair success for automated program repair agents, finding that concrete, executable, and well-localized information is most b…

View →
cs.SEcs.LGEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

DeepSWE: Measuring Frontier Coding Agents on Original, Long-Horizon Engineering Tasks

Wenqi Huang, Charley Lee, Leonard Tng, Serena Ge

DeepSWE is a new benchmark for evaluating coding agents with original tasks written from scratch and hand-graded verifiers.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 11, 2026

Comment and Control: Hijacking Agentic Workflows via Context-Grounded Evolution

Neil Fendley, Zhengyu Liu, Aonan Guan, Jiacheng Zhong +1 more

The paper introduces JAW, a novel framework that demonstrates how adversaries can hijack agentic workflows on automation platforms like GitHub Actions by manipulating inputs based on context-grounded…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 26, 2026

Govern the Repository, Not the Agent: Measuring Ecosystem-Level Risk in AI-Native Software

Daniel Russo

This paper measures the integration friction in code repositories caused by autonomous coding agents and finds that about half of the variation in friction is repository-level, and agent-authored cont…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJul 1, 2026

Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering

James C. Davis, Paschal C. Amusuo, Tanmay Singla, Berk Çakar +1 more

This paper presents a case study on using AI coding agents in software engineering and develops a process model for governing high-velocity agentic implementation.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 29, 2026

How Generation Architecture Shapes Code Complexity in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Paired Study on HumanEval

Nazmus Ashrafi

The study found that while multi-agent LLM code generation architectures significantly affect code complexity, the added complexity does not translate into better functional correctness, suggesting ar…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.OSEmpiricalRecentJul 20, 2026

TRIM: Reducing AI-Generated CodeSlop via Agent Trajectory Minimization

Alex Mathai, Shobini Iyer, Aleksandr Nogikh, Petros Maniatis +3 more

This paper introduces TRIM, an algorithm that minimizes redundant edits in AI-generated code, called CodeSlop, by minimizing agent trajectories, reducing CodeSlop by 17.9%-32.9% with negligible perfor…

View →
cs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 30, 2026

AxDafny: Agentic Verified Code Generation in Dafny

Benjamin Breen, Austin Letson, Borja Requena Pozo, Leopoldo Sarra

The paper introduces AxDafny, a verifier-guided repair framework that improves verification success in Dafny by generating implementations, invariants, assertions, and termination arguments.

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJun 18, 2026

N-Version Programming with Coding Agents

Javier Ron, Benoit Baudry, Martin Monperrus

This paper revisits N-version programming with AI coding agents and finds substantial common-mode failures but also practical benefits.

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 13, 2026

Knowledge-Guided Synthetic Bug Feedback for LLM-Based Unit Test Generation

Ziheng Wang, Maike Li, Chen Zhi

This paper proposes a framework to transform historical real-bug mechanisms into executable feedback targets for LLM-based unit test generation, improving real-bug detection over various baselines.

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 22, 2026

From Preventive to Reactive: How AI Coding Assistants Transform Developers' Security Awareness

Faisal Haque Bappy, Tahrim Hossain, Sidratul Muntaher Meheraj, Annoor Sharara Akhand +4 more

The paper investigates how AI coding assistants shift developers' security focus from proactive prevention to reactive review, finding that this structural change is reinforced by current tool interac…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Do LLMs Favor Their Providers? Measuring Vertical Integration Bias in Code Generation

Melih Catal, Alex Wolf, Tiago Ferreiro Matos, Pooja Rani +1 more

The paper introduces Vertical Integration Bias (VIB) to quantify whether LLMs favor their own provider's ecosystem when generating code, finding that this bias is significant in both direct and agenti…

View →