ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “Automated software development”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 24, 2026

Vibe Coding: An Experiment with Test-Driven Development

Moritz Mock, Barbara Russo

This paper explores how humans and conversational large language models can collaborate through vibe coding, comparing solo and collaborative interaction models in software development using Test-Driv…

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 21, 2026

TraceDev: A Traceability-Driven Multi-agent Framework for Requirement-to-Code Development

Mingyu Chen, Yakun Zhang, Zihao Xie, Yixing Luo +4 more

The paper proposes TraceDev, a multi-agent framework for automated software development grounded in use cases, achieving higher success rates than baseline approaches in repository-level code generati…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIPositionRecentJun 26, 2026

Reasoning Beyond Prediction: From Data-Driven to Causal Software Engineering

Roberto Pietrantuono, Luca Giamattei, Stefano Russo

This paper proposes a new paradigm for human-machine cooperation in software engineering, where machines amplify engineers' reasoning through causation.

View →
cs.AIcs.SEEmpiricalRecentJun 18, 2026

AutoACSL: Synthesizing ACSL Specifications by Integrating LLMs with CPG-Based Static Analysis

Han Zhou, Yu Luo, Dianxiang Xu

AutoACSL is a framework that uses Code Property Graphs and large language models to generate formal specifications for C programs with improved success ratio and full proof ratio.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentJun 3, 2026

From Prompt to Process: a Process Taxonomy and Comparative Assessment of Frameworks Supporting AI Software Development Agents

Sanderson Oliveira de Macedo

This paper studies AI development frameworks for software engineering and proposes a six-dimension process taxonomy.

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

On the Correctness of Software Merge

Akira Mori, Masatomo Hashimoto

The paper introduces a new structural merge tool that ensures parsability and universality in comparison to existing tools, resulting in fewer incorrect merge results.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.HCRecentMay 28, 2026

How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions

Ningzhi Tang, Chaoran Chen, Gelei Xu, Yiyu Shi +4 more

This study analyzes over 20,000 real-world coding sessions to show that AI coding agents frequently fail users through subtle misalignment, requiring constant manual correction even when major system…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJul 1, 2026

Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering

James C. Davis, Paschal C. Amusuo, Tanmay Singla, Berk Çakar +1 more

This paper presents a case study on using AI coding agents in software engineering and develops a process model for governing high-velocity agentic implementation.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.NIEmpiricalRecentJun 19, 2026

Context-Aware Generative AI for Automated Telecom Test Script Generation

Gautam Prasad, Chandramohan T. N., Joy Bose

This paper proposes a context-aware AI framework for generating telecom test scripts that adapt to fine-grained changes in the system using a delta engine and a knowledge graph.

View →
cs.PLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

SEMBridge: Tagless-Final Program Semantics with Weakest-Precondition and Bounded-Checking Interpretations

Eric Liang

SEMBridge is a tagless-final framework that allows a single executable object program to generate multiple program semantics, including weakest-precondition and bounded-checking interpretations, ensur…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

From Capability Models to Automated Planning: An AAS-Native Approach for Automatic PDDL Generation

Hamied Nabizada, Thomas Wirt, Luis Miguel Vieira da Silva, Felix Gehlhoff +1 more

This paper proposes an automated method to generate complete PDDL planning problems directly from Asset Administration Shell (AAS) capability models, eliminating the need for specialized planning expe…

View →
cs.SEPositionRecentJul 24, 2026

Code Review is a Conversation: Toward Conversational AI Review Assistants

Rosalia Tufano

This paper proposes conversational AI review assistants for code review, systems that engage in conversation with developers instead of just generating comments.

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJun 29, 2026

How do Execution Features Improve Statistical Fault Localization? An Empirical Study

Marius Smytzek, Andreas Zeller

This paper evaluates the improvement of statistical fault localization by augmenting it with execution features.

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 2, 2026

Epic-Organized vs. Requirement-Aligned Gherkin: An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Based Acceptance Criteria Generation

Shahbaz Siddeeq, Mateen Abbasi, Jussi Rasku, Zheying Zhang +3 more

This paper compares the quality and coverage of epic-organized LLM-generated Gherkin acceptance criteria with requirement-aligned generation, using four requirements documents from the PURE dataset.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Code-QA-Bench: Separating Code Reasoning from Documentation Memorization in Repository-Level QA

Jun Zhang, JianYing Qu, Hanwen Du, Zhongkai Sun +2 more

The paper introduces Code-QA-Bench, a novel framework that rigorously separates genuine code reasoning from mere documentation memorization in repository-level code understanding benchmarks.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.OSEmpiricalRecentJul 20, 2026

TRIM: Reducing AI-Generated CodeSlop via Agent Trajectory Minimization

Alex Mathai, Shobini Iyer, Aleksandr Nogikh, Petros Maniatis +3 more

This paper introduces TRIM, an algorithm that minimizes redundant edits in AI-generated code, called CodeSlop, by minimizing agent trajectories, reducing CodeSlop by 17.9%-32.9% with negligible perfor…

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 17, 2026

TARS: A Theory-of-Mind Agent for Personalized In-IDE Code Comprehension

Leopoldo Todisco, Antonio Della Porta, Stefano Lambiase, Fabio Palomba

TARS is an LLM-powered agent integrated into Visual Studio Code that provides autonomous explanations anchored directly to the code under analysis, adapting to developers' expertise, role, and stylist…

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

Biased or Personalized? The Impact of Personal Information on AI-driven Development

Erfan Entezami, Madeline Endres

This paper investigates how developer attributes influence generated software using AI, finding significant differences in interface design, template content, and code structure based on age and gende…

View →