ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “Defense strategy”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.GTcs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

Zero-determinant Strategy for Moving Target Defense: Existence, Performance, and Computation

Zhaoyang Cheng, Guanpu Chen, Yiguang Hong, Ming Cao +1 more

This paper proposes using a zero-determinant (ZD) strategy to construct an effective Moving Target Defense (MTD) that maintains performance comparable to the optimal Stackelberg equilibrium while dras…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.GTRecentMar 21, 2026

Cyber Deception for Mission Surveillance via Hypergame-Theoretic Deep Reinforcement Learning

Zelin Wan, Jin-Hee Cho, Mu Zhu, Ahmed H. Anwar +2 more

This paper proposes using cyber deception with honey drones (HDs) to defend UAV mission systems against Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, achieving superior performance using a novel Hypergame-Theoreti…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 10, 2026

Operationalizing Cybersecurity Governance for Mitigation Planning with Attack-Path Modeling and Reinforcement Learning

Philip Huff, Dakota Dale, Harshith Guduru, Rohan Singh +1 more

The paper proposes a system that operationalizes cybersecurity governance frameworks by integrating them with attack-path modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning to generate practical, resource-const…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 6, 2026

Pen-Strategist: A Reasoning Framework for Penetration Testing Strategy Formation and Analysis

Yasod Ginige, Pasindu Marasinghe, Sajal Jain, Suranga Seneviratne

The Pen-Strategist framework addresses the limitations of current automated penetration testing by integrating a novel domain-specific reasoning model for robust strategy formation and an accurate cla…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentApr 12, 2026

A Queueing-Theoretic Framework for Dynamic Attack Surfaces: Data-Integrated Risk Analysis and Adaptive Defense

Jihyeon Yun, Abdullah Yasin Etcibasi, Ming Shi, C. Emre Koksal

The paper introduces a queueing-theoretic framework to model dynamic cyber-attack surfaces, developing an adaptive reinforcement learning defense policy that significantly reduces active vulnerabiliti…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 19, 2026

The Autonomy Tax: Defense Training Breaks LLM Agents

Shawn Li, Yue Zhao

Defense training for LLM agents, intended to improve safety, systematically degrades their core competence, leading to unreliability in multi-step tasks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 17, 2026

DeepStage: Learning Autonomous Defense Policies Against Multi-Stage APT Campaigns

Trung V. Phan, Tri Gia Nguyen, Thomas Bauschert

DeepStage is a deep reinforcement learning framework that achieves autonomous, stage-aware defense against multi-stage APT campaigns by fusing graph-based telemetry and predicting attacker stages.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 14, 2026

Defenses at Odds: Measuring and Explaining Defense Conflicts in Large Language Models

Xiangtao Meng, Wenyu Chen, Chuanchao Zang, Xinyu Gao +4 more

This paper systematically measures and explains how sequential model defenses can conflict, finding that 38.9% of ordered defense sequences cause measurable risk exacerbation due to anti-aligned param…

View →
econ.THcs.CRcs.GTRecentMay 5, 2026

The Adversarial Discount -- AI, Signal Correlation, and the Cybersecurity Arms Race

James W. Bono

The paper models the cybersecurity arms race using a contest-theoretic framework, showing that full cross-correlation of threat intelligence can neutralize the attacker's structural advantage from inc…

View →
cs.CRcs.ETRecentMar 18, 2026

Network and Device Level Cyber Deception for Contested Environments Using RL and LLMs

Abhijeet Sahu, Shuva Paul, Richard Macwan

This paper reviews advanced AI-based solutions, specifically combining LLMs and RL, to create dynamic and cost-effective network and device-level cyber deception strategies for contested environments.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.MARecentApr 6, 2026

Explainable Autonomous Cyber Defense using Adversarial Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Yiyao Zhang, Diksha Goel, Hussain Ahmad

The paper introduces C-MADF, a causally constrained multi-agent framework that significantly reduces false positives in autonomous cyber defense by restricting response actions to structurally consist…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 22, 2026

DeepXplain: XAI-Guided Autonomous Defense Against Multi-Stage APT Campaigns

Trung V. Phan, Thomas Bauschert

DeepXplain introduces an explainable deep reinforcement learning framework that enhances the trustworthiness and effectiveness of autonomous cyber defense against multi-stage APT campaigns by integrat…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Landseer: Exploring the Machine Learning Defense Landscape

Ayushi Sharma, Rosemary Agbozo, Santiago Torres-Arias, Zahra Ghodsi

The paper introduces Landseer, a modular framework designed to systematically evaluate and compose multiple machine learning defenses to address complex, real-world security requirements.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM

Mohammad Mamun, Mohamed Gaber, Scott Buffett, Sherif Saad

The paper evaluates Language Model Agents (LMAs) for red-teaming by benchmarking their ability to perform lateral movement, finding that expert-defined action plans are most effective, though all moda…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 23, 2026

AutoRISE: Agent-Driven Strategy Evolution for Red-Teaming Large Language Models

Tanmay Gautam, Alireza Bahramali, Sandeep Atluri

AutoRISE proposes optimizing the entire attack strategy—by searching over executable programs—rather than just optimizing prompts, achieving significant improvements in red-teaming large language mode…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 11, 2026

PlanGuard: Defending Agents against Indirect Prompt Injection via Planning-based Consistency Verification

Guangyu Gong, Zizhuang Deng

PlanGuard is a training-free defense framework that uses an isolated Planner and hierarchical verification to defend LLM agents against Indirect Prompt Injection by verifying the consistency of planne…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 14, 2026

One Step to the Side: Why Defenses Against Malicious Finetuning Fail Under Adaptive Adversaries

Itay Zloczower, Eyal Lenga, Gilad Gressel, Yisroel Mirsky

The paper demonstrates that current defenses against malicious fine-tuning of foundation models are insufficient because they only address fixed attacks, and introduces a unified adaptive attack that…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 16, 2026

A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems

Ayan Javeed Shaikh, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Ankit Shah

The paper proposes an autonomous red teaming framework combining LLMs and RL to generate sophisticated, multi-stage cyber attack campaigns, demonstrating its necessity for evaluating robust AI-enabled…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 9, 2026

Building Better Environments for Autonomous Cyber Defence

Chris Hicks, Elizabeth Bates, Shae McFadden, Isaac Symes Thompson +11 more

This paper synthesizes expert knowledge from a workshop to provide a comprehensive framework and best-practice guidelines for developing high-quality reinforcement learning environments for autonomous…

View →