ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “LLM provenance testing”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLNEWEmpiricalJul 28, 2026

Stemma: Induced Decision Regions Reveal LLM Provenance

Keyu Zhang, Vadim Safronov, Andrew Martin

This paper introduces Stemma, a black-box LLM fingerprinting method that abstracts away surface-form variation and measures the inheritance of decision regions for reliable provenance testing.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 3, 2026

From Agent Traces to Trust: Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents

Yiqi Wang, Jiaqi Zhang, Taotao Cai, Zirui Liu +5 more

This survey provides a systematic framework and taxonomy for evidence tracing and execution provenance in LLM agents, addressing the difficulty of verifying and auditing complex agent behaviors.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 27, 2026

Efficient and Scalable Provenance Tracking for LLM-Generated Code Snippets

Andrea Gurioli, Davide D'Ascenzo, Federico Pennino, Maurizio Gabbrielli +1 more

The paper introduces a hybrid system, HYBRIDSOURCETRACKER (HST), that combines vector search and Winnowing fingerprinting to achieve scalable, high-precision provenance tracking for code generated by…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

Attesting LLM Pipelines: Enforcing Verifiable Training and Release Claims

Zhuoran Tan, Jeremy Singer, Christos Anagnostopoulos

The paper proposes an attestation-aware promotion gate to mitigate supply-chain risks in LLM pipelines by cryptographically verifying and enforcing claims about training and release artifacts before d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

Combating Data Laundering in LLM Training

Muxing Li, Zesheng Ye, Sharon Li, Feng Liu

The paper introduces Synthesis Data Reversion (SDR), a method that infers the data laundering transformation used in LLM training and synthesizes queries to restore the detection signals lost when pro…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability

Tom Lucas, Alessio Buscemi, Alfredo Capozucca, German Castignani +1 more

LLM-FACETS introduces an open-source, privacy-preserving framework designed to enable non-technical domain experts and compliance officers to audit and evaluate the transparency and accountability of…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

The Granularity Mismatch in Agent Security: Argument-Level Provenance Solves Enforcement and Isolates the LLM Reasoning Bottleneck

Linfeng Fan, Ziwei Li, Yuan Tian, Yichen Wang +2 more

The paper introduces PACT, a provenance-aware runtime monitor that enhances agent security by tracking the origin and trust of individual tool arguments, solving the granularity mismatch in LLM agent…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Forensic Implications of Localized AI: Artifact Analysis of Ollama, LM Studio, and llama.cpp

Shariq Murtuza

This paper systematically analyzes the forensic artifacts left by popular local LLM runners (Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp) on Windows and Linux, providing a foundational corpus of evidence for digital…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Implicit Identity Technologies for LLMs: Fingerprinting and Watermarking across Datasets, Models, and Generated Content

Bing Liu, Shunping Wang, Yufan Zhu, Xinyi Yu +4 more

This paper introduces 'implicit identity' as a unifying framework to survey and categorize LLM fingerprinting and watermarking techniques for verifying ownership and provenance across datasets, models…

View →
cs.LOcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

Proof-Carrying Certificates for LLM Pipelines: A Trust-Boundary Architecture

George Koomullil

The paper proposes a trust-boundary architecture using Lean 4 to verify the deterministic structured computations surrounding LLM pipelines, providing verifiable certificates for high-stakes deploymen…

View →
cs.IRcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJul 7, 2026

Faithful or Findable? Evaluating LLM-Generated Metadata for RDF Dataset Search

Riccardo Terrenzi, Serkan Ayvaz

This paper studies six metadata-generation settings for RDF datasets and evaluates their effectiveness and faithfulness in dataset search.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.SERecentApr 30, 2026

REBENCH: A Procedural, Fair-by-Construction Benchmark for LLMs on Stripped-Binary Types and Names (Extended Version)

Jun Yeon Won, Xin Jin, Shiqing Ma, Zhiqiang Lin

The paper introduces REBench, a comprehensive, standardized benchmark dataset designed to enable fair and rigorous evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex binary reverse engineering task…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 14, 2026

MemLineage: Lineage-Guided Enforcement for LLM Agent Memory

Ciyan Ouyang, Rui Hou

MemLineage introduces a novel, cryptographically-backed defense mechanism that enforces a chain-of-custody for LLM agent memory, preventing untrusted or poisoned state from justifying sensitive action…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Teaching Language Models to Check Grounded Claim Factuality with Human Test-Taking Strategies

Yuxuan Ye, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Edwin Simpson

The paper proposes a novel, efficient method for checking the factuality of claims generated by LLMs by framing it as a true/false reading comprehension task and incorporating explicit test-taking str…

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 13, 2026

Knowledge-Guided Synthetic Bug Feedback for LLM-Based Unit Test Generation

Ziheng Wang, Maike Li, Chen Zhi

This paper proposes a framework to transform historical real-bug mechanisms into executable feedback targets for LLM-based unit test generation, improving real-bug detection over various baselines.

View →
cs.SEEmpiricalRecentJul 8, 2026

Rethinking Code Performance Benchmarks for LLMs

Nhat Minh Le, Yisen Xu, Zhijie Wang, Tse-Hsun +1 more

This paper evaluates the performance of large language models on popular benchmarks and finds that only a small percentage of the performant implementations are significantly faster than canonical sol…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 28, 2026

The Surprising Universality of LLM Outputs: A Real-Time Verification Primitive

Alex Bogdan, Adrian de Valois-Franklin

The paper identifies a universal, statistically predictable distribution (Mandelbrot) governing LLM outputs, enabling a highly efficient, model-agnostic scoring primitive for provenance and quality as…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 17, 2026

Operationalising Artificial Intelligence Bills of Materials (AIBOMs) for Verifiable AI Provenance and Lifecycle Assurance

Petar Radanliev, Omar Santos, Carsten Maple, Kay Atefi

The paper introduces the Artificial Intelligence Bill of Materials (AIBOM) schema to provide verifiable provenance and lifecycle assurance for complex AI systems, achieving high fidelity in reproducib…

View →