ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “Understanding of decision-making processes, Large Language Models, and Reinforcement Learning”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.MAEmpiricalRecentJul 2, 2026

Evaluating Large Language Models for Decision-Making in Agent-Based Urban Mobility Simulations

Bruno Cascaes Alves, Míriam Blank Born, Ulisses Gilioli Francescatto Júnior, Felipe Moura Goulart +2 more

This paper explores the integration of Large Language Models as decision-making components in multi-agent simulations for urban mobility modeling.

View →
math.OCcs.LGcs.MATheoreticalRecentJul 1, 2026

Mean Field Reinforcement Learning

René Carmona, Mathieu Laurière

This paper introduces mean field reinforcement learning through Markov decision processes in large-population stochastic control, developing the necessary framework for representative-agent learning,…

View →
cs.CLSurveyRecentJul 1, 2026

Understanding Large Language Models

Yannik Keller, Thomas Eisenmann

This paper discusses the current understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs), their capabilities, and their relationship to human cognition, with a focus on emerging capabilities and mechanistic imp…

View →
cs.AIcs.MAEmpiricalRecentJul 3, 2026

Human-Centric Reflective Architecture for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making

Andreas Kouridakis, Dimitrios Patiniotis Spyropoulos, George Vouros

This paper introduces a human-AI collaborative decision-making framework, called Human-Centric Reflective Architecture (HCRA), to enhance effectiveness and align AI agents with human preferences using…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

When are LLMs Sufficient Policy Optimizers for Sequential RL Tasks?

Stephane Hatgis-Kessell, Emma Brunskill

The paper introduces Prompted Policy Optimization (PromptPO), an LLM-based method that successfully optimizes policies for various sequential RL tasks, demonstrating that LLMs can replace classical RL…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Policy and World Modeling Co-Training for Language Agents

Ning Lu, Baijiong Lin, Shengcai Liu, Jiahao Wu +8 more

The paper proposes PaW, a co-training framework that uses standard RL rollouts to provide auxiliary world model supervision directly during policy training, significantly improving language agent perf…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

On Effectiveness and Efficiency of Agentic Tool-calling and RL Training

Tong Liu, Cheng Qian, Matej Cief, Yuan He +3 more

This paper analyzes tool-calling in LLM agents, demonstrating that evaluation results are highly sensitive to implementation details and proposing new techniques to significantly improve the efficienc…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

DenoiseRL: Bootstrapping Reasoning Models to Recover from Noisy Prefixes

Caijun Xu, Changyi Xiao, Zhongyuan Peng, Yixin Cao

DenoiseRL is a novel reinforcement learning framework that improves reasoning in large language models by optimizing directly from the failures and incorrect reasoning traces of weak models, eliminati…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

The Paradox of Outcome Optimization: A Causal Information-Theoretic Bound on Reasoning Shortcuts in LLMs

Zihan Chen, Yiming Zhang, Wenxiang Geng, Zenghui Ding +1 more

The paper theoretically explains that optimizing LLMs solely on outcomes leads to brittle reasoning (Reward-Induced Manifold Collapse) by favoring low-complexity shortcuts, and proposes process-based…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

HERO'S JOURNEY: Testing Complex Rule Induction with Text Games

Anshun Asher Zheng, Kanishka Misra, David I. Beaver, Junyi Jessy Li

The paper introduces HERO'S JOURNEY, a benchmark for testing complex rule induction in text games, finding that while LLMs show limited rule induction ability, procedural tasks remain a significant ch…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Learning to Assign Prediction Tasks to Agents with Capacity Constraints

Shang Wu, Saatvik Kher, Padhraic Smyth

This paper develops a policy-learning framework to optimally assign prediction tasks to multiple agents, considering individual agent expertise and capacity constraints, achieving systematic performan…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

RoleCDE:Benchmarking and Mitigating Role-Alignment Trade-offs in Role-Playing Agents

Huayi Lai, Shichao Song, Simin Niu, Hanyu Wang +4 more

The paper introduces RoleCDE, a novel benchmark that evaluates role-playing agents' ability to resolve conflicts between role-specific values and general alignment constraints, revealing a 'Role Value…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

A Primer in Post-Training Reasoning Data: What We Know About How It Works

Yaoming Li, Guangxiang Zhao, Qilong Shi, Lin Sun +2 more

This paper synthesizes over 150 scattered studies and reports to provide the first comprehensive primer on post-training reasoning data, organizing the field around data objects, utility, construction…

View →
stat.MLcs.LGTheoreticalRecentJul 3, 2026

A Hierarchy of Policy Learning Problems

Hamsa Bastani, Osbert Bastani, Shihan Chen

This paper provides a mathematical framework for studying different policy learning problems and shows reductions between them.

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Emergent Languages in Populations of Language Model Agents: From Token Efficiency to Oversight Evasion

Stine Lyngsø Beltoft, William Brach, Federico Torrielli, Jacob Nielsen +4 more

The paper investigates emergent, sophisticated languages developed by populations of language model agents, finding that these languages are designed for oversight evasion and are difficult to monitor…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Reinforcement Learning with Pairwise Preferences in Long-Term Decision Problems

Jonathan Colaço Carr, Prakash Panangaden, Doina Precup, Benjamin Van Roy

The paper introduces the Markov decision contest, a new framework for reinforcement learning using pairwise preferences, and proves that stationary Markov policies are optimal and solvable efficiently…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Doing What They Say, Not What They Reason: Locating the Faithfulness Gap in LLM Agents

Yufeng Wang

This paper investigates the 'faithfulness gap' in LLM agents—the discrepancy between stated reasoning and actual action—by decomposing it into two opposing steps: reasoning-to-conclusion and conclusio…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 27, 2026

Structured Prompt Optimization Meets Reinforcement Learning for Global and Local Interpretability over Complex Text

Tianyang Zhou, Wenbo Chen, Pierre Jinghong Liang, Leman Akoglu

The paper introduces eXTC, a novel framework that combines structured prompt optimization, knowledge distillation, and reinforcement learning to create a highly performant and fully interpretable text…

View →