ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.20279v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGcs.MARecentApr 6, 2026

Explainable Autonomous Cyber Defense using Adversarial Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Yiyao Zhang, Diksha Goel, Hussain Ahmad

The paper introduces C-MADF, a causally constrained multi-agent framework that significantly reduces false positives in autonomous cyber defense by restricting response actions to structurally consist…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 9, 2026

Building Better Environments for Autonomous Cyber Defence

Chris Hicks, Elizabeth Bates, Shae McFadden, Isaac Symes Thompson +11 more

This paper synthesizes expert knowledge from a workshop to provide a comprehensive framework and best-practice guidelines for developing high-quality reinforcement learning environments for autonomous…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 18, 2026

Agent Security is a Systems Problem

Mihai Christodorescu, Earlence Fernandes, Ashish Hooda, Somesh Jha +10 more

The paper argues that agent security must be treated as a systems problem, requiring the enforcement of security invariants at the system level rather than solely relying on improving the underlying A…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 16, 2026

A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems

Ayan Javeed Shaikh, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Ankit Shah

The paper proposes an autonomous red teaming framework combining LLMs and RL to generate sophisticated, multi-stage cyber attack campaigns, demonstrating its necessity for evaluating robust AI-enabled…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Defending LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Against Cooperative Attacks with Sentence-Level Rectification

Yaoyang Luo, Zhi Zheng, Ziwei Zhao, Tong Xu +4 more

This paper addresses the threat of coordinated misinformation in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems by proposing a defense framework, STAR, that effectively identifies and rectifies misleading information…

View →
cs.MAcs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

Architecture Matters for Multi-Agent Security

Ben Hagag, William L. Anderson, Christian Schroeder de Witt, Sarah Scheffler

This paper empirically demonstrates that the architectural design of multi-agent systems significantly impacts their security, finding that coordination mechanisms can introduce vulnerabilities greate…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 27, 2026

Dynamic Cyber Ranges

Víctor Mayoral-Vilches, María Sanz-Gómez, Francesco Balassone, Maite Del Mundo De Torres +5 more

The paper proposes Dynamic Cyber Ranges, an advanced cyber range environment using LLM-driven Defender agents to counter the saturation of traditional security benchmarks, demonstrating that these dyn…

View →
cs.ROcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Propagating Unsafe Actions in LLM Controlled Multi-Robot Collaboration via Single Robot Compromise

Zhen Huang, Zhihuang Liu, Mengxuan Luo, Weishang Wu +1 more

The paper proposes a novel attack paradigm demonstrating how compromising a single robot in an LLM-controlled multi-robot system can rapidly propagate malicious intent to cause coordinated unsafe acti…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 8, 2026

CyBiasBench: Benchmarking Bias in LLM Agents for Cyber-Attack Scenarios

Taein Lim, Seongyong Ju, Munhyeok Kim, Hyunjun Kim +1 more

The paper introduces CyBiasBench, a comprehensive benchmark that quantifies the inherent, agent-specific bias in LLM agents' attack selection patterns in cybersecurity scenarios.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 30, 2026

Design Principles for the Construction of a Benchmark Evaluating Security Operation Capabilities of Multi-agent AI Systems

Yicheng Cai, Mitchell John DeStefano, Guodong Dong, Pulkit Handa +4 more

This paper proposes a set of design principles and a conceptual benchmark (SOC-bench) to systematically evaluate the blue team operational capabilities of multi-agent AI systems in autonomous Security…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 7, 2026

Autonomous Adversary: Red-Teaming in the age of LLM

Mohammad Mamun, Mohamed Gaber, Scott Buffett, Sherif Saad

The paper evaluates Language Model Agents (LMAs) for red-teaming by benchmarking their ability to perform lateral movement, finding that expert-defined action plans are most effective, though all moda…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 25, 2026

CyberEvolver: Structured Self-Evolution for Cybersecurity Agents On the Fly

Yihe Fan, Changyi Li, Lichen Xu, Xudong Pan +3 more

The paper introduces CyberEvolver, a self-evolving agent framework that iteratively revises its own operational scaffold based on failed execution attempts, significantly improving cybersecurity agent…

View →
cs.AIcs.CReess.SYRecentMay 4, 2026

Stable Agentic Control: Tool-Mediated LLM Architecture for Autonomous Cyber Defense

Kerri Prinos, Lilianne Brush, Cameron Denton, Zhanqi Wang +4 more

The paper proposes a tool-mediated LLM architecture for autonomous cyber defense, formally proving its stability and demonstrating that it significantly reduces an attacker's expected payoff in real-w…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 9, 2026

ACIArena: Toward Unified Evaluation for Agent Cascading Injection

Hengyu An, Minxi Li, Jinghuai Zhang, Naen Xu +5 more

The paper introduces ACIArena, a unified and comprehensive evaluation framework designed to systematically test the robustness of Multi-Agent Systems against complex Agent Cascading Injection attacks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.HCRecentMay 6, 2026

Agentic AI and the Industrialization of Cyber Offense: Forecast, Consequences, and Defensive Priorities for Enterprises and the Mittelstand

Christopher Koch

The paper forecasts that agentic AI will compress the cyber attack lifecycle by lowering the cost of multiple attack stages, necessitating immediate operational security upgrades for enterprises and t…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework

Kexin Chu

The paper proposes the Layered Attack Surface Model (LASM), a structural taxonomy that maps security threats and defenses across the complex, multi-layered architecture of AI agents, revealing signifi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.GTRecentMar 21, 2026

Cyber Deception for Mission Surveillance via Hypergame-Theoretic Deep Reinforcement Learning

Zelin Wan, Jin-Hee Cho, Mu Zhu, Ahmed H. Anwar +2 more

This paper proposes using cyber deception with honey drones (HDs) to defend UAV mission systems against Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, achieving superior performance using a novel Hypergame-Theoreti…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

Redefining AI Red Teaming in the Agentic Era: From Weeks to Hours

Raja Sekhar Rao Dheekonda, Will Pearce, Nick Landers

The paper introduces an AI red teaming agent that drastically reduces the time and effort required for security testing by allowing operators to define complex attack goals using natural language, com…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 30, 2026

Security Attack and Defense Strategies for Autonomous Agent Frameworks: A Layered Review with OpenClaw as a Case Study

Luyao Xu, Xiang Chen

This paper provides a systematic, layered review of security risks and defense strategies for autonomous agent frameworks, using OpenClaw as a case study to address the current lack of integrated rese…

View →
eess.SYcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 20, 2026

An Agentic Multi-Agent Architecture for Cybersecurity Risk Management

Ravish Gupta, Saket Kumar, Shreeya Sharma, Maulik Dang +1 more

The paper introduces a novel six-agent AI architecture for cybersecurity risk assessment, demonstrating high accuracy and speed compared to human experts, though its performance is ultimately limited…

View →