ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2603.24857v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 14, 2026

One Step to the Side: Why Defenses Against Malicious Finetuning Fail Under Adaptive Adversaries

Itay Zloczower, Eyal Lenga, Gilad Gressel, Yisroel Mirsky

The paper demonstrates that current defenses against malicious fine-tuning of foundation models are insufficient because they only address fixed attacks, and introduces a unified adaptive attack that…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 26, 2026

Landseer: Exploring the Machine Learning Defense Landscape

Ayushi Sharma, Rosemary Agbozo, Santiago Torres-Arias, Zahra Ghodsi

The paper introduces Landseer, a modular framework designed to systematically evaluate and compose multiple machine learning defenses to address complex, real-world security requirements.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

Protecting On-Device AI Inference: A Systematic Review of Attacks and Defence Mechanisms

Zisis Tsiatsikas, Alexandros Fakis, Georgios Karopoulos, Vasileios Kouliaridis +1 more

This paper provides the first comprehensive review of threats and defenses specifically targeting on-device AI inference, revealing a significant imbalance where certain attack types, like adversarial…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 22, 2026

Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models

Yannis Belkhiter, Giulio Zizzo, Sergio Maffeis, Seshu Tirupathi +1 more

This paper introduces a novel Function Hijacking Attack (FHA) that manipulates the tool selection process of agentic models, demonstrating a robust and context-agnostic threat to function calling LLMs…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 7, 2026

A Formal Security Framework for MCP-Based AI Agents: Threat Taxonomy, Verification Models, and Defense Mechanisms

Nirajan Acharya, Gaurav Kumar Gupta

The paper introduces MCPSHIELD, a comprehensive formal security framework that systematically characterizes and provides a defense-in-depth architecture for the rapidly adopted but insecure Model Cont…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.DCRecentApr 10, 2026

XFED: Non-Collusive Model Poisoning Attack Against Byzantine-Robust Federated Classifiers

Israt Jahan Mouri, Muhammad Ridowan, Muhammad Abdullah Adnan

The paper introduces XFED, a novel non-collusive model poisoning attack that demonstrates the feasibility of compromising Federated Learning systems without requiring coordination among attackers, byp…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 25, 2026

A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework

Kexin Chu

The paper proposes the Layered Attack Surface Model (LASM), a structural taxonomy that maps security threats and defenses across the complex, multi-layered architecture of AI agents, revealing signifi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 30, 2026

Security Attack and Defense Strategies for Autonomous Agent Frameworks: A Layered Review with OpenClaw as a Case Study

Luyao Xu, Xiang Chen

This paper provides a systematic, layered review of security risks and defense strategies for autonomous agent frameworks, using OpenClaw as a case study to address the current lack of integrated rese…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMar 19, 2026

Automated Membership Inference Attacks: Discovering MIA Signal Computations using LLM Agents

Toan Tran, Olivera Kotevska, Li Xiong

The paper introduces AutoMIA, a novel framework that uses LLM agents to automate the discovery and implementation of Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs), achieving state-of-the-art performance by syst…

View →
cs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

Operationalizing Cyber Attack Prediction: A Gap-Prioritized Framework with Dataset and Model Selection Guidelines

Aminu Muhammad Auwal

This paper proposes a gap-prioritization framework to bridge the gap between theoretical cyber attack prediction research and practical operational deployment by identifying critical implementation hu…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMay 30, 2026

Authenticity Debt and the Synthetic Content Threat Landscape: A Layered Framework for Trust, Provenance, and IP Governance in the Generative AI Era

Shubhashis Sengupta, Benjamin McCarty, Milind Savagaonkar, Rhine Andotra

The paper introduces the concept of 'authenticity debt'—the institutional liability from deploying unverified AI content—and proposes a layered reference architecture combining cryptographic provenanc…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMay 30, 2026

Authenticity Debt and the Synthetic Content Threat Landscape: A Layered Framework for Trust, Provenance, and IP Governance in the Generative AI Era

Shubhashis Sengupta, Benjamin McCarty, Milind Savagaonkar, Rhine Andotra

The paper introduces the concept of 'authenticity debt'—the institutional liability from deploying unverified AI content—and proposes a layered reference architecture combining cryptographic provenanc…

View →
cs.LGcs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

A No-Defense Defense Against Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks on ML-NIDS: Is Less More?

Mohamed elShehaby, Ashraf Matrawy

The paper demonstrates that simpler, shallower Deep Neural Network architectures with reduced features and ReLU activations can inherently improve the robustness of ML-NIDS against gradient-based adve…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

When AI Meets Wall Street: A Survey on Trustworthy AI in Fintech

Qingwen Zeng, Zhenghao Zhao, Yitian Yang, Yiqi Zhu +5 more

This paper proposes a unified, lifecycle-centric framework and a detailed taxonomy to survey and analyze novel, finance-specific attack surfaces and vulnerabilities in AI systems used within the finan…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

AI Model Extraction Attacks: Bypassing Single-Client Assumptions in Defenses

Maxime Schwarzer, Johannes F. Loevenich, Gustavo Sánchez, Laurin Holz +4 more

This paper demonstrates that current AI model extraction defenses, which assume attacks come from single sources, are easily bypassed by coordinated, distributed threat actors.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 10, 2026

Position: AI Security Policy Should Target Systems, Not Models

Michael A. Riegler, Inga Strümke

The paper demonstrates that advanced capabilities, such as jailbreaking large language models and finding software vulnerabilities, can be achieved effectively at zero cost by coordinating multiple sm…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 3, 2026

A Systematic Security Evaluation of OpenClaw and Its Variants

Yuhang Wang, Haichang Gao, Zhenxing Niu, Zhaoxiang Liu +3 more

The paper systematically evaluates six OpenClaw-series AI agent frameworks, demonstrating that these agentized systems possess significant security vulnerabilities that are distinct from and more seve…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentJun 2, 2026

RogueMerge: Robust and Unified Attacks against LLM Model Merging

Jinghuai Zhang, Yetian He, Kunlin Cai, Han Zhao +2 more

RogueMerge introduces a unified framework to robustly attack LLM model merging by addressing the challenges of autoregressive decoding, unknown merging configurations, and prompt generalization, signi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 22, 2026

Cross-Session Threats in AI Agents: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Algorithms

Ari Azarafrooz

The paper introduces CSTM-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark and evaluation framework demonstrating that standard session-bound AI guardrails fail against sophisticated, cross-session attacks that accum…

View →