ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.00627v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.LGRecentJun 2, 2026

RogueMerge: Robust and Unified Attacks against LLM Model Merging

Jinghuai Zhang, Yetian He, Kunlin Cai, Han Zhao +2 more

RogueMerge introduces a unified framework to robustly attack LLM model merging by addressing the challenges of autoregressive decoding, unknown merging configurations, and prompt generalization, signi…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 4, 2026

When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents

Mingyu Luo, Zihan Zhang, Zesen Liu, Yuchong Xie +6 more

This paper introduces the Relay Tampering Attack (RTA), demonstrating that malicious third-party relays can undermine the security of LLM agents by modifying responses post-alignment, even if the LLM…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 21, 2026

Blind Spots in the Guard: How Domain-Camouflaged Injection Attacks Evade Detection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

Aaditya Pai

The paper identifies a critical vulnerability, the Camouflage Detection Gap (CDG), where standard LLM injection detectors fail dramatically when malicious payloads mimic the target domain's language a…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 13, 2026

Model-Agnostic Lifelong LLM Safety via Externalized Attack-Defense Co-Evolution

Xiaozhe Zhang, Chaozhuo Li, Hui Liu, Shaocheng Yan +3 more

The EvoSafety framework enhances LLM safety by externalizing attack and defense mechanisms, enabling persistent, transferable, and model-agnostic robustness against adversarial prompts.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

HarmChip: Evaluating Hardware Security Centric LLM Safety via Jailbreak Benchmarking

Zeng Wang, Minghao Shao, Weimin Fu, Prithwish Basu Roy +5 more

The paper introduces HarmChip, a novel benchmark to evaluate LLM vulnerability to domain-specific hardware security threats, revealing that current safety guardrails fail against semantically disguise…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMar 23, 2026

SecureBreak -- A dataset towards safe and secure models

Marco Arazzi, Vignesh Kumar Kembu, Antonino Nocera

The paper introduces SecureBreak, a manually annotated, safety-oriented dataset designed to help detect harmful outputs from large language models (LLMs) that bypass existing security alignments.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 17, 2026

Security Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Defensive Framework

Taiwo Onitiju, Iman Vakilinia

The paper establishes a standardized security assessment framework and develops a multi-layered defensive system, demonstrating that systematic testing and external defenses are crucial for safe LLM d…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 24, 2026

Training a General Purpose Automated Red Teaming Model

Aishwarya Padmakumar, Leon Derczynski, Traian Rebedea, Christopher Parisien

The paper proposes a general-purpose pipeline to train automated red teaming models capable of generating attacks for arbitrary adversarial goals, overcoming the limitations of current methods that ar…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.ETRecentMay 30, 2026

Quality-Diversity Evolution for Discovering Diverse Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety

Subhadip Mitra

The paper introduces a quality-diversity evolutionary framework that evolves interpretable attack strategies, successfully discovering distinct and systematic vulnerabilities in major LLMs like GPT-4o…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.ETRecentMay 30, 2026

Quality-Diversity Evolution for Discovering Diverse Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety

Subhadip Mitra

The paper introduces a quality-diversity evolutionary framework that discovers diverse, interpretable vulnerabilities in large language models by evolving attack strategies at the semantic level, reve…

View →
cs.CRcs.ARcs.LGRecentMay 11, 2026

LLMs for Secure Hardware Design and Related Problems: Opportunities and Challenges

Johann Knechtel, Ozgur Sinanoglu, Ramesh Karri

This review analyzes the dual impact of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into hardware design, detailing both their transformative potential in EDA and the critical security vulnerabilities th…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 17, 2026

When Efficiency Backfires: Cascading LLMs Trigger Cascade Failure under Adversarial Attack

Zehan Sun, Dingfan Chen, Songze Li

This paper demonstrates that LLM cascade systems, designed for efficiency, are vulnerable to targeted adversarial attacks that simultaneously degrade both performance and cost-efficiency.

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentApr 9, 2026

The Art of (Mis)alignment: How Fine-Tuning Methods Effectively Misalign and Realign LLMs in Post-Training

Rui Zhang, Hongwei Li, Yun Shen, Xinyue Shen +5 more

The paper investigates how various fine-tuning methods can be used both to intentionally misalign and subsequently realign large language models (LLMs), revealing distinct strengths for attack and def…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 20, 2026

TitanCA: Lessons from Orchestrating LLM Agents to Discover 100+ CVEs

Ting Zhang, Yikun Li, Chengran Yang, Ratnadira Widyasari +14 more

TitanCA presents a novel, multi-agent LLM orchestration framework that significantly improves vulnerability discovery by reducing false positives and identifying numerous zero-day vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 24, 2026

Security in the Fine-Tuning Lifecycle of Large Language Models: Threats, Defenses,Evaluation, and Future Directions

Wenjuan Li, Yitao Liu, Runze Chen, Rajkumar Buyya

This paper provides a systematic, lifecycle-based framework for analyzing security threats and defenses across the entire fine-tuning process of LLMs, revealing that attack effectiveness is highly mod…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 11, 2026

LITMUS: Benchmarking Behavioral Jailbreaks of LLM Agents in Real OS Environments

Chiyu Zhang, Huiqin Yang, Bendong Jiang, Xiaolei Zhang +7 more

The paper introduces LITMUS, a novel benchmark that rigorously tests LLM agents for dangerous, physical-layer behavioral jailbreaks in real OS environments, revealing that current agents frequently ex…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 15, 2026

SafeHarness: Lifecycle-Integrated Security Architecture for LLM-based Agent Deployment

Xixun Lin, Yang Liu, Yancheng Chen, Yongxuan Wu +7 more

The paper introduces SafeHarness, a novel, lifecycle-integrated security architecture that significantly reduces unsafe behavior and attack success rates in LLM agents by weaving multiple defense laye…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 14, 2026

One Step to the Side: Why Defenses Against Malicious Finetuning Fail Under Adaptive Adversaries

Itay Zloczower, Eyal Lenga, Gilad Gressel, Yisroel Mirsky

The paper demonstrates that current defenses against malicious fine-tuning of foundation models are insufficient because they only address fixed attacks, and introduces a unified adaptive attack that…

View →