ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.01644v1· 20 results

cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use

Chenglin Yang

AgentTrust is a novel runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates AI agent tool calls before execution, achieving high accuracy in detecting unsafe actions across complex and obfuscated scenari…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security

Dongrui Liu, Yu Li, Zhonghao Yang, Peng Wang +46 more

The paper introduces AgentDoG 1.5, a lightweight and scalable alignment framework that significantly improves AI agent safety and security for complex open-world agent deployments.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 28, 2026

AgentDoG 1.5: A Lightweight and Scalable Alignment Framework for AI Agent Safety and Security

Dongrui Liu, Yu Li, Zhonghao Yang, Peng Wang +46 more

The paper introduces AgentDoG 1.5, a lightweight and scalable alignment framework that significantly improves AI agent safety and security for complex, open-world agentic scenarios.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

The Verifier Tax: Horizon Dependent Safety Success Tradeoffs in Tool Using LLM Agents

Tanmay Sah, Vishal Srivastava, Dolly Sah, Kayden Jordan

The paper analyzes how runtime safety enforcement impacts the performance of multi-step LLM agents, finding that while safety mechanisms can block unsafe actions, they impose a significant performance…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMar 18, 2026

Who Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call Safety

Xuan Chen, Lu Yan, Ruqi Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang

The paper introduces SafeAudit, a meta-audit framework that systematically enumerates test cases and uses a quantitative metric to uncover significant residual unsafe behaviors in LLM agents that exis…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 28, 2026

SafeClaw-R: Towards Safe and Secure Multi-Agent Personal Assistants

Haoyu Wang, Zibo Xiao, Yedi Zhang, Christopher M. Poskitt +1 more

The paper proposes SafeClaw-R, a novel framework that enforces safety as a system-level invariant over the execution graph to mitigate the high safety and security risks inherent in autonomous multi-a…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLRecentMay 11, 2026

LITMUS: Benchmarking Behavioral Jailbreaks of LLM Agents in Real OS Environments

Chiyu Zhang, Huiqin Yang, Bendong Jiang, Xiaolei Zhang +7 more

The paper introduces LITMUS, a novel benchmark that rigorously tests LLM agents for dangerous, physical-layer behavioral jailbreaks in real OS environments, revealing that current agents frequently ex…

View →
cs.CRcs.CVRecentMar 18, 2026

Toward Reliable, Safe, and Secure LLMs for Scientific Applications

Saket Sanjeev Chaturvedi, Joshua Bergerson, Tanwi Mallick

This paper addresses the critical need for trustworthy LLMs in science by proposing a comprehensive, multi-layered defense framework and methodology to evaluate unique scientific vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 18, 2026

Agent Meltdowns: The Road to Hell Is Paved with Helpful Agents

Rishi Jha, Harold Triedman, Arkaprabha Bhattacharya, Vitaly Shmatikov

The paper introduces and measures 'accidental meltdown,' a new type of unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign environmental errors, finding that such meltdowns occur frequently and often involve hi…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 24, 2026

AgentWall: A Runtime Safety Layer for Local AI Agents

Ashwin Aravind

AgentWall is a runtime safety layer that intercepts and evaluates all proposed actions from local AI agents against a declarative policy, ensuring safety before execution.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 15, 2026

SafeHarness: Lifecycle-Integrated Security Architecture for LLM-based Agent Deployment

Xixun Lin, Yang Liu, Yancheng Chen, Yongxuan Wu +7 more

The paper introduces SafeHarness, a novel, lifecycle-integrated security architecture that significantly reduces unsafe behavior and attack success rates in LLM agents by weaving multiple defense laye…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 12, 2026

The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use Agents

Xuwei Ding, Skylar Zhai, Linxin Song, Jiate Li +5 more

The paper introduces OS-BLIND, a benchmark demonstrating that current safety evaluations fail to detect critical vulnerabilities in computer-use agents when user instructions are benign, showing high…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

EMBGuard: Constructing Hazard-Aware Guardrails for Safe Planning in Embodied Agents

Dongwook Choi, Taeyoon Kwon, Bogyung Jeong, Minju Kim +5 more

EMBGuard introduces a novel, MLLM-based safety guardrail that explicitly identifies and explains physical hazards from (visual observation, action) pairs, enabling safer planning for embodied agents.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 31, 2026

SABER: Benchmarking Operational Safety of LLM Coding Agents in Stateful Project Workspaces

Qi Hu, Yifeng Tang, Qinghua Wang, Lanyang Zhao +6 more

The paper introduces SABER, a new benchmark that evaluates the operational safety of LLM coding agents in complex, stateful project environments, finding that current models have a high rate of harmfu…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

RUBAS: Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning for Agent Safety

Xian Qi Loye, Qinglin Su, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui +4 more

The paper introduces RUBAS, a rubric-based reinforcement learning framework that improves agent safety by providing fine-grained, multi-dimensional rewards for complex tool-use scenarios.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 12, 2026

SkillSafetyBench: Evaluating Agent Safety under Skill-Facing Attack Surfaces

Chang Jin, An Wang, Zeming Wei, Kai Wang +6 more

The paper introduces SkillSafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark demonstrating that agent safety failures often stem from adversarial influences within reusable skills and execution environments, rath…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 17, 2026

Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security

Jinhu Qi, Muzhi Li, Jiahong Liu, Yuqin Shu +8 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, practical guide to ensuring the trustworthiness of complex, autonomous agentic AI systems by focusing on safety, robustness, privacy, and system security.

View →
cs.ROcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Propagating Unsafe Actions in LLM Controlled Multi-Robot Collaboration via Single Robot Compromise

Zhen Huang, Zhihuang Liu, Mengxuan Luo, Weishang Wu +1 more

The paper proposes a novel attack paradigm demonstrating how compromising a single robot in an LLM-controlled multi-robot system can rapidly propagate malicious intent to cause coordinated unsafe acti…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 22, 2026

Session Risk Memory (SRM): Temporal Authorization for Deterministic Pre-Execution Safety Gates

Florin Adrian Chitan

The paper introduces Session Risk Memory (SRM), a lightweight module that enhances per-action authorization gates with trajectory-level risk assessment, significantly improving detection of distribute…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLRecentApr 20, 2026

Owner-Harm: A Missing Threat Model for AI Agent Safety

Dongcheng Zhang, Yiqing Jiang

The paper introduces Owner-Harm, a formal threat model addressing the critical blind spot of AI agents harming their own deployers, demonstrating that specialized defenses are needed beyond generic sa…

View →