ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.05807v1· 20 results

cs.CRRecentApr 25, 2026

AsmRAG: LLM-Driven Malware Detection by Retrieving Functionally Similar Assembly Code

ElMouatez Billah Karbab

AsmRAG is a novel framework that improves malware detection by treating it as an evidence-based retrieval task using a code-specialized LLM, achieving high accuracy while providing transparent forensi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Large Byte Model: Teaching Language Models About Compiled Code

Florian Störtz, Catalin-Andrei Stan, Alexandru Dinu, Sandra Servia-Rodríguez +3 more

The paper introduces the first byte-native Large Language Model (LLM) capable of analyzing raw executable binary data, achieving high accuracy in tasks like malware and architecture classification.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMar 17, 2026

Detecting Data Poisoning in Code Generation LLMs via Black-Box, Vulnerability-Oriented Scanning

Shenao Yan, Shimaa Ahmed, Shan Jin, Sunpreet S. Arora +3 more

The paper introduces CodeScan, a novel black-box framework that detects data poisoning in code generation LLMs by analyzing structural similarities across multiple generations to identify recurring, v…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

From Theory to Practice: Code Generation Using LLMs for CAPEC and CWE Frameworks

Murtuza Shahzad, Joseph Wilson, Ibrahim Al Azher, Hamed Alhoori +1 more

The paper introduces a novel, large-scale dataset of vulnerable code snippets linked to CAPEC and CWE, generated using advanced LLMs, to improve automatic vulnerability detection.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 7, 2026

LLM4CodeRE: Generative AI for Code Decompilation Analysis and Reverse Engineering

Hamed Jelodar, Samita Bai, Tochukwu Emmanuel Nwankwo, Parisa Hamedi +3 more

The paper introduces LLM4CodeRE, a domain-adaptive LLM framework that significantly improves bidirectional code reverse engineering by unifying assembly-to-source and source-to-assembly translation.

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Bridging Code Property Graphs and Language Models for Program Analysis

Ahmed Lekssays

The paper introduces codebadger, a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates Joern's Code Property Graph (CPG) with LLMs, enabling large language models to perform large-scale, semantic prog…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

Attesting LLM Pipelines: Enforcing Verifiable Training and Release Claims

Zhuoran Tan, Jeremy Singer, Christos Anagnostopoulos

The paper proposes an attestation-aware promotion gate to mitigate supply-chain risks in LLM pipelines by cryptographically verifying and enforcing claims about training and release artifacts before d…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 20, 2026

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan +14 more

The paper introduces RAVEN, a Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network, which uses LLM agents and RAG to automatically generate comprehensive, structured vulnerability analysis reports fo…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 13, 2026

Code-Centric Detection of Vulnerability-Fixing Commits: A Unified Benchmark and Empirical Study

Nils Loose, Joseph Bienhüls, Kristoffer Hempel, Felix Mächtle +1 more

The paper evaluates code language model-based detection of vulnerability-fixing commits (VFCs) using a unified benchmark and concludes that code changes alone are insufficient for accurate detection,…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 30, 2026

Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features

Rebecca Saul, Jingzhi Jiang, Elliott Chia, David Wagner

The paper introduces Trident, a novel malware detection system that combines static features, LLM-derived behavioral rules, and direct LLM analysis to achieve superior robustness against concept drift…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 27, 2026

Efficient and Scalable Provenance Tracking for LLM-Generated Code Snippets

Andrea Gurioli, Davide D'Ascenzo, Federico Pennino, Maurizio Gabbrielli +1 more

The paper introduces a hybrid system, HYBRIDSOURCETRACKER (HST), that combines vector search and Winnowing fingerprinting to achieve scalable, high-precision provenance tracking for code generated by…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 5, 2026

LLM-Enabled Open-Source Systems in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in GitHub Security Advisories

Fariha Tanjim Shifat, Hariswar Baburaj, Ce Zhou, Jaydeb Sarker +1 more

The paper analyzes GitHub security advisories for LLM-integrated open-source systems, finding that while most vulnerabilities map to existing code-level weaknesses, the architectural risks like Supply…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 4, 2026

SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization

Hao Wang, Niels Mündler, Mark Vero, Jingxuan He +2 more

The paper introduces SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches reasoning language models (RLMs) to autonomously internalize structured security reasoning, significantly improving secure code generati…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

Automated Malware Family Classification using Weighted Hierarchical Ensembles of Large Language Models

Samita Bai, Hamed Jelodar, Tochukwu Emmanuel Nwankwo, Parisa Hamedi +3 more

The paper proposes a zero-label malware family classification framework that uses a weighted hierarchical ensemble of large language models (LLMs) to classify malware without requiring labeled trainin…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

MalwarePT: A Binary-Level Foundation Model for Malware Analysis

Saastha Vasan, Yuzhou Nie, Kaie Chen, Yigitcan Kaya +5 more

MalwarePT introduces a novel binary-level foundation model, pretrained on Windows PE code-section bytes using a ModernBERT-style encoder, demonstrating superior transfer learning capabilities across v…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code

Rebecca Balebako, Jasmine Egl

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

View →