ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.11315v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-Based Static Analysis for Secure Smart Contract Development: Reliability, Limitations, and Potential Hybrid Solutions

Stefan-Claudiu Susan, Andrei Arusoaie, Dorel Lucanu

This paper benchmarks LLMs for smart contract security analysis, concluding that while LLMs show potential, their reliability is limited by lexical bias and requires integration with traditional stati…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 29, 2026

Neuroforger: certified violation witnesses for smart contracts verification via LLMs

Massimo Bartoletti, Enrico Lipparini

The paper introduces Neuroforger, a system that combines a new formal specification language with LLMs and type checking to reliably generate and validate concrete violation witnesses (counterexamples…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMay 29, 2026

How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code

Rebecca Balebako, Jasmine Egl

The paper proposes an automated, standardized framework to empirically compare the security quality of code generated through human-only, LLM-only, and hybrid collaboration methods.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Inferring Code Correctness from Specification

Tambon Florian, Papadakis Mike

The paper introduces TRAILS~, a novel method that improves code correctness validation by grounding LLM reasoning in concrete (input, output) pairs derived from specifications, achieving state-of-the-…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Projectional Decoding: Towards Semantic-Aware LLM Generation

Boqi Chen, José Antonio Hernández López, Aren A. Babikian

The paper proposes projectional decoding, a novel framework that integrates a partial graph model alongside text generation to ensure the semantic validity of LLM-generated software artifacts.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 21, 2026

Security of LLM-generated Code: A Comparative Analysis

Srivathsan G Morkonda, Mahmoud Selim, Hala Assal

This paper empirically evaluates the security of code generated by seven popular LLMs and finds that all evaluated models generate code containing critical or high-severity vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 5, 2026

LLM-Enabled Open-Source Systems in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in GitHub Security Advisories

Fariha Tanjim Shifat, Hariswar Baburaj, Ce Zhou, Jaydeb Sarker +1 more

The paper analyzes GitHub security advisories for LLM-integrated open-source systems, finding that while most vulnerabilities map to existing code-level weaknesses, the architectural risks like Supply…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 24, 2026

Does Teaming-Up LLMs Improve Secure Code Generation? A Comprehensive Evaluation with Multi-LLMSecCodeEval

Bushra Sabir, Shigang Liu, Seung Ick Jang, Sharif Abuadbba +5 more

The paper evaluates multi-LLM strategies for secure code generation, finding that hybrid pipelines combining ensembling, static analysis, and patching achieve the strongest security performance, outpe…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 11, 2026

Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

Souradip Nath, Chih-Yi Huang, Aditi Ganapathi, Kashyap Thimmaraju +2 more

Analyzing Reddit discussions, the paper finds that while security practitioners see LLMs as useful for boosting productivity, their adoption is constrained by concerns over reliability, verification,…

View →
cs.PLcs.CRRecentMay 15, 2026

Compile-time Security Analysis and Optimization of Sensitive String Producers

Mike Samuel, Tom Palmer, Shaw Summa, Robert Grayson

The paper proposes a general, compiler-integrated framework for secure content composition that minimizes the syntactic difference between secure and insecure coding practices.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 21, 2026

Finding Missing Input Validation in TEEs via LLM-Assisted Symbolic Execution

Chengyan Ma, Jieke Shi, Ruidong Han, Ye Liu +2 more

The paper introduces SymTEE, an LLM-assisted symbolic execution framework that detects missing input validation vulnerabilities in TEE applications without needing complex, real TEE setups.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 5, 2026

KVerus: Scalable and Resilient Formal Verification Proof Generation for Rust Code

Yuwei Liu, Xinyi Wan, Yanhao Wang, Minghua Wang +2 more

KVerus is a retrieval-augmented system that significantly improves the scalability and resilience of formal verification for Rust code by managing complex cross-module dependencies and adapting to cod…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.SERecentMay 24, 2026

Inverting the Shield: Systematically Generating Safety Tests from Policy Specifications

Xiaoyue Lu, Xianglin Yang, Haijun Liu, Jiahao Liu +3 more

The paper introduces POLARIS, a novel framework that systematically generates comprehensive and verifiable safety tests for LLMs by formalizing natural language policies into First-Order Logic and exp…

View →
cs.ARcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 15, 2026

VeriCWEty: Embedding enabled Line-Level CWE Detection in Verilog

Prithwish Basu Roy, Zeng Wang, Anatolii Chuvashlov, Weihua Xiao +3 more

VeriCWEty proposes an embedding-based framework to detect and classify common software vulnerabilities (CWEs) in Verilog RTL code at both module and line levels, achieving high detection accuracy.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 28, 2026

From CRUD to Autonomous Agents: Formal Validation and Zero-Trust Security for Semantic Gateways in AI-Native Enterprise Systems

Ignacio Peyrano

The paper proposes a Semantic Gateway and a Zero-Trust security model to formally validate and secure autonomous AI agents operating in enterprise systems, achieving a 100% discovery rate of unauthori…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 16, 2026

Securing LLM Agents Need Intent-to-Execution Integrity

Wenjie Qu, Ming Xu, Peiran Wang, Shengfang Zhai +2 more

The paper proposes defining 'intent-to-execution integrity' as the necessary end-to-end correctness property for securing LLM agents, arguing that current defenses are insufficient due to untrusted co…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 17, 2026

Surgical Repair of Insecure Code Generation in LLMs

Gustavo Sandoval, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Siddharth Garg

This paper identifies the 'Format-Reliability Gap'—where LLMs know about code vulnerabilities but generate insecure code anyway—and proposes a localized, per-vulnerability steering vector fix that sig…

View →