ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.27827· 20 results

cs.CYcs.AIcs.CRRecentMar 26, 2026

Preserving Decision Sovereignty in Military AI: A Trade-Secret-Safe Architectural Framework for Model Replaceability, Human Authority, and State Control

Peng Wei, Wesley Shu

The paper proposes the Energetic Paradigm, a model-agnostic architectural framework that allows states to maintain decision sovereignty and control over military AI systems, even when using proprietar…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentApr 7, 2026

Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries

Andrew Kurtz, Klaudia Krawiecka

This paper introduces the Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT), a comprehensive framework designed to govern the rapidly expanding and currently ungoverned machine identities used by AI systems…

View →
econ.GNcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 24, 2026

The Security Cost of Intelligence: AI Capability, Cyber Risk, and Deployment Paradox

Sukwoong Choi

The paper models the trade-off between deploying increasingly capable AI systems and managing associated cyber risks, finding a 'deployment paradox' where high-loss environments with weak governance l…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 12, 2026

AI Identification: An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Governance in Digital Enterprises

Di Kevin Gao, Jingdao Chen, Shahram Rahimi

The paper proposes a comprehensive, dual-layer architectural framework for AI identification and traceability, ensuring continuous accountability and regulatory oversight throughout the entire lifecyc…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentApr 6, 2026

Hardware-Level Governance of AI Compute: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Regulatory Compliance and Treaty Verification

Samar Ansari

The paper proposes a taxonomy of 20 hardware-level governance mechanisms for AI compute, finding that the most critical mechanisms needed for international treaty verification are currently the least…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 10, 2026

Governing AI-Assisted Security Operations: A Design Science Framework for Operational Decision Support

Elyson A. De La Cruz, Rishikesh Sahay, Md Rasel Al Mamun

The paper proposes a management framework, using a governed AI query-broker artifact, to safely integrate generative AI into high-risk operational decision support, such as Security Operations Centers…

View →
cs.CYcs.CRRecentMay 20, 2026

Backchaining Loss of Control Mitigations from Mission-Specific Benchmarks in National Security

Matteo Pistillo, Samantha Faraone, Joshua Herman

The paper proposes a novel, empirical methodology called 'backchaining' to derive and prioritize Loss of Control (LoC) mitigations by analyzing the errors an AI system makes on mission-specific nation…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Benchmarking AI for low-resource contexts: Thinking beyond leaderboards

Aakash Pant, Kavya Shah, Apoorv Agnihotri, Sneha Nikam +2 more

The paper critiques current AI benchmarking practices for low-resource settings, arguing that evaluation must shift focus from isolated model performance to the holistic performance of the deployed sy…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 12, 2026

Beyond Static Sandboxing: Learned Capability Governance for Autonomous AI Agents

Bronislav Sidik, Lior Rokach

The paper introduces Aethelgard, a novel four-layer adaptive governance framework that enforces least privilege by learning the minimum necessary capabilities for autonomous AI agents based on their i…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 18, 2026

Caging the Agents: A Zero Trust Security Architecture for Autonomous AI in Healthcare

Saikat Maiti

The paper proposes and validates a comprehensive four-layer Zero Trust security architecture designed to mitigate critical vulnerabilities in autonomous AI agents handling Protected Health Information…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

GovAI-Pipe: A Layered AI Governance Pipeline for Citizen-Facing AI in Turkey's e-Government Gateway

Ahmet Kaplan

The paper proposes GovAI-Pipe, a novel four-layer governance pipeline that operationalizes high-level AI policies (like the EU AI Act) into auditable, technical checkpoints for deploying AI in large-s…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 10, 2026

Operationalizing Cybersecurity Governance for Mitigation Planning with Attack-Path Modeling and Reinforcement Learning

Philip Huff, Dakota Dale, Harshith Guduru, Rohan Singh +1 more

The paper proposes a system that operationalizes cybersecurity governance frameworks by integrating them with attack-path modeling and Deep Reinforcement Learning to generate practical, resource-const…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 7, 2026

LanG -- A Governance-Aware Agentic AI Platform for Unified Security Operations

Anes Abdennebi, Nadjia Kara, Laaziz Lahlou, Hakima Ould-Slimane

LanG is a governance-aware, open-source agentic AI platform that unifies security operations by providing advanced correlation, automated rule generation, and attack reconstruction capabilities.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.ETRecentMar 27, 2026

Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?

Shiping Chen, Qin Wang, Guangsheng Yu, Xu Wang +1 more

This paper systematizes the security challenges of open agentic systems, concluding that while attack characterization is mature, the field lacks robust guidelines for operational governance, memory i…

View →
cs.CRcs.CYRecentMay 23, 2026

From Frontier to Shadow AI: A Simmering Threat to Assurance and Security in Critical Infrastructure

Mohan Baruwal Chhetri, Shahroz Tariq, Tooba Aamir, Marthie Grobler +2 more

The paper empirically characterizes 'shadow AI'—the unsanctioned use of frontier AI in critical infrastructure—as a systemic threat that erodes established assurance and security controls.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 7, 2026

From Specification to Deployment: Empirical Evidence from a W3C VC + DID Trust Infrastructure for Autonomous Agents

Lars Kersten Kroehl

The paper introduces MolTrust, a production-deployed trust infrastructure built on W3C standards (VCs and DIDs) that provides a verifiable, multi-layered authorization framework for autonomous AI agen…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.NIRecentMar 26, 2026

Sovereign AI at the Front Door of Care: A Physically Unidirectional Architecture for Secure Clinical Intelligence

Vasu Srinivasan, Dhriti Vasu

The paper proposes a Sovereign AI architecture for clinical triage that ensures maximum security by performing all inference on-device and receiving data only through physically unidirectional channel…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 4, 2026

Explainable AI-Driven Cyber Risk Analytics and Model Reliability Assessment for Intelligent Governance of U.S. Critical Infrastructure: An XGBoost and SHAP-Based Intrusion Detection Framework

B. M. Taslimul Haque, Md. Arifur Rahman, Md. Serajul Kabir Chowdhury Rubel, Md. Iqbal Hossan

This paper proposes an Explainable AI (XAI)-driven framework using XGBoost and SHAP to enhance cyber risk analytics and model reliability for intelligent governance of U.S. critical infrastructure.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentJun 2, 2026

Proof-Carrying Agent Actions: Model-Agnostic Runtime Governance for Heterogeneous Agent Systems

Zexun Wang

The paper proposes Proof-Carrying Agent Actions (PCAA), a runtime-neutral governance model that uses action certificates to consistently track and authorize high-risk actions across diverse and hetero…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.PLRecentMay 1, 2026

Certified Purity for Cognitive Workflow Executors: From Static Analysis to Cryptographic Attestation

Alan L. McCann

The paper introduces a certified purity architecture that strengthens governance in cognitive workflow systems by replacing insufficient runtime checks with cryptographically attested structural guara…

View →