ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.27879· 20 results

cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 17, 2026

Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security

Jinhu Qi, Muzhi Li, Jiahong Liu, Yuqin Shu +8 more

This survey provides a comprehensive, practical guide to ensuring the trustworthiness of complex, autonomous agentic AI systems by focusing on safety, robustness, privacy, and system security.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

AGENTCL: Toward Rigorous Evaluation of Continual Learning in Language Agents

Yiheng Shu, Bernal Jiménez Gutiérrez, Saisri Padmaja Jonnalagedda, Yuguang Yao +2 more

The paper introduces AGENTCL, a rigorous evaluation framework that uses controlled task streams to accurately measure an agent's ability to accumulate and reuse knowledge across multiple tasks, thereb…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

MAVEN: Improving Generalization in Agentic Tool Calling

Omkar Ghugarkar, Vishvesh Bhat, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Asad Aali

The paper introduces MAVEN, a lightweight symbolic reasoning scaffold that significantly improves the generalization and end-to-end success rate of large language models in complex, multi-step tool-ca…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentJun 2, 2026

Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Models

Areeb Gani, Asal Meskin, Gabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Arman Cohan

The paper introduces a novel framework to quantify faithful confidence expression (FC) in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), finding that FC remains a significant and challenging reliability target for th…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Doing What They Say, Not What They Reason: Locating the Faithfulness Gap in LLM Agents

Yufeng Wang

This paper investigates the 'faithfulness gap' in LLM agents—the discrepancy between stated reasoning and actual action—by decomposing it into two opposing steps: reasoning-to-conclusion and conclusio…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

K-BrowseComp: A Web Browsing Agent Benchmark Grounded in Korean Contexts

Nahyun Lee, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Geewook Kim +11 more

The paper introduces K-BrowseComp, a new web-browsing agent benchmark of 400 problems grounded in Korean contexts, demonstrating that current frontier LLMs struggle significantly with complex, context…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Notation Matters: A Benchmark Study of Token-Optimized Formats in Agentic AI Systems

Lorenz Kutschka, Bernhard Geiger

This study benchmarks token-optimized formats (TOON and TRON) against JSON in end-to-end agentic AI systems, finding that TRON significantly reduces token overhead with minimal performance degradation…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

The Case for Model Science: Verify, Explore, Steer, Refine

Przemyslaw Biecek, Luca Longo, Jianlong Zhou, Thomas Fel +2 more

The paper advocates for the establishment of Model Science, a systematic discipline that moves beyond simple benchmarking to deeply analyze AI models' internal workings and failure modes.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 17, 2026

ADR: An Agentic Detection System for Enterprise Agentic AI Security

Chenning Li, Pan Hu, Justin Xu, Baris Ozbas +8 more

The paper introduces ADR, a novel, production-proven detection system that provides high-fidelity security monitoring for AI agents operating via the Model Context Protocol, significantly outperformin…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

TimeSage-MT: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Time Series Reasoning

Yaxuan Kong, Qingren Yao, Yuqi Nie, Yichen Li +6 more

The paper introduces TimeSage-MT, a comprehensive multi-turn benchmark designed to rigorously test an LLM agent's ability to perform complex, evolving time series analysis, revealing critical gaps in…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

CRAB-Bench: Evaluating LLM Agents under Complex Task Dependencies and Human-aligned User Simulation

Danqing Wang, Akshay Sivaraman, Lei Li

The paper introduces CRAB-Bench and RUSE, a rigorous evaluation framework that tests LLM agents on complex, interdependent tasks with realistic human user interactions, revealing significant performan…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVRecentMay 27, 2026

OmniVerifier-M1: Multimodal Meta-Verifier with Explicit Structured Recalibration

Xinchen Zhang, Bowei Liu, Jiale Liu, Chufan Shi +6 more

The paper introduces OmniVerifier-M1, a multimodal meta-verifier that uses symbolic outputs and decoupled reinforcement learning to provide robust, fine-grained verification and error localization for…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

DREAM-R: Multimodal Speculative Reasoning with RL-Based Refined Drafting, Precise Verification, and Fully Parallel Execution

Yunhai Hu, Zining Liu, Xiangyang Yin, Tianhua Xia +4 more

DREAM-R is a novel framework that significantly enhances speculative reasoning in large multimodal models by optimizing draft generation alignment, introducing a robust verification mechanism, and ena…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Learning to Construct Practical Agentic Systems

Aditya Kumar, Zhihan Lei, Jerry Yan, Joshua W. Momo +5 more

The paper proposes a modular agent framework and novel learning methods to design and optimize practical, cost-effective, and controllable LLM-based agentic systems.

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 12, 2026

Verify Before You Fix: Agentic Execution Grounding for Trustworthy Cross-Language Code Analysis

Jugal Gajjar

The paper introduces an execution-grounded, cross-language framework that significantly improves the reliability of LLM-driven code vulnerability analysis by ensuring that all proposed fixes are confi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentJun 3, 2026

From Agent Traces to Trust: Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents

Yiqi Wang, Jiaqi Zhang, Taotao Cai, Zirui Liu +5 more

This survey provides a systematic framework and taxonomy for evidence tracing and execution provenance in LLM agents, addressing the difficulty of verifying and auditing complex agent behaviors.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Locally Coherent, Globally Incoherent: Bounding Compositional Incoherence in Multi-Component LLM Agents

Anany Kotawala

The paper introduces a metric, the compositional residual eps*, to quantify how multi-component LLM agents violate basic probability axioms when combining local, coherent claims into a global predicti…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.IRRecentApr 3, 2026

AutoVerifier: An Agentic Automated Verification Framework Using Large Language Models

Yuntao Du, Minh Dinh, Kaiyuan Zhang, Ninghui Li

AutoVerifier is an LLM-based agentic framework that automates the end-to-end verification of complex technical claims, enabling non-experts to generate evidence-backed intelligence assessments.

View →
cs.LOcs.CRcs.FLRecentMar 20, 2026

Agentproof: Static Verification of Agent Workflow Graphs

Melwin Xavier, Vaisakh M A, Melveena Jolly, Midhun Xavier

Agentproof is a system that provides static, pre-deployment verification of safety properties in agent workflow graphs by automatically extracting a unified graph model and applying structural and tem…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.MARecentMay 1, 2026

Skills as Verifiable Artifacts: A Trust Schema and a Biconditional Correctness Criterion for Human-in-the-Loop Agent Runtimes

Alfredo Metere

The paper proposes a trust schema and verification framework to ensure that agent skills, which augment LLMs, are rigorously verified before deployment, thereby making human-in-the-loop oversight scal…

View →