ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.28282· 20 results

cs.CLcs.AIcs.CERecentMay 28, 2026

MOOSE-Copilot: A Web-Based Interactive Assistant for Unified Exploratory and Fine-Grained Scientific Hypothesis Discovery

Hongran An, Zonglin Yang

MOOSE-Copilot is a novel web-based framework that unifies scientific hypothesis discovery by formalizing human-AI interaction, significantly improving performance over autonomous LLM baselines.

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentApr 24, 2026

Sovereign Agentic Loops: Decoupling AI Reasoning from Execution in Real-World Systems

Jun He, Deying Yu

The paper introduces Sovereign Agentic Loops (SAL), a control-plane architecture that decouples LLM reasoning from system execution to enhance safety and reliability in real-world AI agents.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentApr 28, 2026

Making AI-Assisted Grant Evaluation Auditable without Exposing the Model

Kemal Bicakci

The paper proposes a TEE-based architecture that enables external, auditable verification of AI-assisted grant evaluations without exposing the proprietary model, scoring logic, or intermediate reason…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Extending AI for Research to the Humanities: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evidence-Grounded Scholarship

Yating Pan, Jiajun Zhang, Jun Wang, Qi Su

The paper introduces SPIRE, a multi-agent framework designed to extend LLM research capabilities to the humanities by enabling evidence-grounded interpretive reasoning over primary sources.

View →
cs.AIcs.CRcs.IRRecentApr 3, 2026

AutoVerifier: An Agentic Automated Verification Framework Using Large Language Models

Yuntao Du, Minh Dinh, Kaiyuan Zhang, Ninghui Li

AutoVerifier is an LLM-based agentic framework that automates the end-to-end verification of complex technical claims, enabling non-experts to generate evidence-backed intelligence assessments.

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

When Knowledge Is Not Free: Cost-Aware Evidence Selection in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Mingyan Wu, Han Yang, Omer Ben-Porat, Yftah Ziser

This paper introduces cost-aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), demonstrating that fixed evidence selection is brittle and that adaptive, agentic controllers are necessary for effective knowled…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

ForeSci: Evaluating LLM Agents for Forward-Looking AI Research Judgment

Qiuyu Tian, Zequn Liu, Yingce Xia, Haojie Yin +1 more

The paper introduces ForeSci, a novel benchmark that evaluates LLM agents' ability to make forward-looking research judgments using only historical evidence, finding that explicit evidence organizatio…

View →
cs.NIcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 12, 2026

Large Language Models for Agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, Evaluation, and Safety

Muhammad Bilal, Jon Crowcroft, Ruizhi Wang, Xiaolong Xu +1 more

The paper surveys the use of LLMs for agentic NetOps and AIOps, arguing that operational reliability depends not on the model itself, but on robust surrounding machinery and workflow-centered evaluati…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

AutoSci: A Memory-Centric Agentic System for the Full Scientific Research Lifecycle

Weitong Qian, Beicheng Xu, Zhongao Xie, Bowen Fan +15 more

AutoSci is a memory-centric agentic system designed to automate the entire scientific research lifecycle by integrating structured memory, multi-stage execution, and continuous self-improvement.

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 30, 2026

MOSAIC: Modular Orchestration for Structured Agentic Intelligence and Composition

Yifan Bao, Xinyu Xi, Xinyu Liu, Wen Ge +7 more

MOSAIC introduces a structured agentic framework that treats automated data science as a staged, context-grounded model selection problem, improving performance and traceability over traditional AutoM…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

I-WebGenBench : Evaluating Interactivity in LLM-Generated Scientific Web Applications

Dasen Dai, Biao Wu, Meng Fang, Shuoqi Li +1 more

The paper introduces I-WebGenBench, a framework and benchmark that converts static scientific papers into executable, interactive web systems, allowing users to dynamically explore the paper's mechani…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability

Tom Lucas, Alessio Buscemi, Alfredo Capozucca, German Castignani +1 more

LLM-FACETS introduces an open-source, privacy-preserving framework designed to enable non-technical domain experts and compliance officers to audit and evaluate the transparency and accountability of…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

HRBench: Benchmarking and Understanding Thinking-Mode Switch Strategies in Hybrid-Reasoning LLMs

Yansong Ning, Mianpeng Liu, Jingwen Ye, Weidong Zhang +1 more

The paper introduces HRBench, a unified and comprehensive evaluation framework for systematically benchmarking and comparing various thinking-mode switching strategies in hybrid-reasoning LLMs.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

SciIntBench: Measuring LLM Compliance with Research Integrity Norms Under Adversarial Framing

Almene De Meran Meguimtsop, Maria Leonor Pacheco, Daniel E. Acuna

The paper introduces SciIntBench, an adversarial benchmark that reveals that LLMs' adherence to research integrity norms is highly sensitive to how the misconduct is framed, often failing when the mis…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

SciIntBench: Measuring LLM Compliance with Research Integrity Norms Under Adversarial Framing

Almene De Meran Meguimtsop, Maria Leonor Pacheco, Daniel E. Acuna

The paper introduces SciIntBench, an adversarial benchmark that reveals that LLMs' adherence to research integrity norms is highly sensitive to how the misconduct is framed, failing particularly when…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMar 28, 2026

Sovereign Context Protocol: An Open Attribution Layer for Human-Generated Content in the Age of Large Language Models

Praneel Panchigar, Torlach Rush, Matthew Canabarro

The paper introduces the Sovereign Context Protocol (SCP), an open-source, attribution-aware data access layer designed to standardize how Large Language Models (LLMs) connect to and track usage of hu…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Ryze: Evidence-Enriched Data Synthesis from Biomedical Papers

Yeqi Huang, Yue Chen, Yanwei Ye, Guanhao Su +1 more

The paper introduces Ryze, an automated system that synthesizes evidence-enriched Question-Answering (QA) pairs from raw biomedical papers, resulting in a specialized VLM (BioVLM-8B) that significantl…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Towards Verifiable Multimodal Deep Research: A Multi-Agent Harness for Interleaved Report Generation

Chenghao Zhang, Guanting Dong, Yufan Liu, Tong Zhao +1 more

The paper introduces extsc{Ptah}, a multi-agent harness designed to improve verifiable multimodal deep research by orchestrating the entire report generation process, ensuring factual grounding and v…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Benchmarking AI for low-resource contexts: Thinking beyond leaderboards

Aakash Pant, Kavya Shah, Apoorv Agnihotri, Sneha Nikam +2 more

The paper critiques current AI benchmarking practices for low-resource settings, arguing that evaluation must shift focus from isolated model performance to the holistic performance of the deployed sy…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer

Katharina Deckenbach, Haritz Puerto, Jonas Geiping, Sahar Abdelnabi

The paper demonstrates that models can acquire 'evaluation meta-knowledge' from training data describing evaluation practices, leading to inflated safety benchmark performance that is independent of e…

View →