ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.29493· 20 results

cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

UA-Legal-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Ukrainian Legal Reasoning

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces UA-Legal-Bench, a comprehensive Ukrainian legal reasoning benchmark built from a massive judicial corpus, demonstrating that LLM performance is highly task-dependent and that simp…

View →
cs.CRcs.CVcs.CYRecentMay 20, 2026

Verifiable Provenance and Watermarking for Generative AI: An Evidentiary Framework for International Operational Law and Domestic Courts

Gustav Olaf Yunus Laitinen-Fredriksson Lundström-Imanov, Nurana Abdullayeva

The paper proposes a unified evidentiary framework combining cryptographic provenance, statistical watermarking, and zero-knowledge attestation to address the legal challenges posed by synthetic media…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

The Cases LJP Never Sees: Prosecution Decision Prediction for More Complete Criminal Liability Assessment

Junyu Lu, Qi Wei, Peishuo Zheng, Jie Zhang +5 more

The paper introduces Prosecution Decision Prediction (PDP), a new legal AI task that assesses prosecutorial review decisions, showing that current state-of-the-art LLMs perform significantly worse on…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law

Sebastian Nagl, Ann-Kristin Mayrhofer, Martin Heidebach, Aleyna Koçak +5 more

The paper introduces BenGER, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs on German legal reasoning, demonstrating that closed-flagship models perform best and that human-AI co-creation significantly…

View →
cs.DCcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 31, 2026

Hierarchical Online Prompt Mutation with Dual-Loop Feedback for Guardrailed Evidence Document Generation: A Production-Evaluation Case Study

Nataraj Agaram Sundar Tejas Morabia

The paper introduces HOPM, a hierarchical online prompt mutation framework that significantly improves the performance of language models in high-stakes evidence document generation by integrating dua…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

ImmigrationQA: A Source-Grounded Dataset and Small-Model Adaptation for U.S. Immigration Law

Nazarii Shportun

The authors created ImmigrationQA, a large source-grounded QA dataset for U.S. immigration law, and fine-tuned a small language model (Llama 3.2 3B) on it, achieving a significant performance boost ov…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Multi-Legal-Bench, a novel cross-jurisdictional benchmark evaluating LLMs on five standardized legal reasoning tasks across six diverse countries, demonstrating that cross-lingual…

View →
q-fin.RMcs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 6, 2026

The Insurability Frontier of AI Risk: Mapping Threats to Affirmative Coverage, Silent Exposures, and Exclusions

Alex Leung, Rex Zhang, Ervin Ling, Kentaroh Toyoda +1 more

This paper maps the emerging insurability frontier of AI risk by coding 55 AI threat classes against 26 insurance products, identifying four tiers of coverage: affirmative, silent, excluded, and outsi…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law

Ethan Zhao, Maksym Taranukhin, Wei Cui, Moira Aikenhead +1 more

The paper introduces CanLegalRAGBench, a new Canadian legal QA benchmark, and evaluates RAG systems, finding that while open-source models are competitive, automatic evaluations struggle with nuanced…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 10, 2026

ChatGPT, is this real? The influence of generative AI on writing style in top-tier cybersecurity papers

Daan Vansteenhuyse

This paper analyzes top-tier cybersecurity papers to find evidence of generative AI's influence, finding a post-2022 increase in AI-associated marker words and a general drift toward higher lexical co…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 29, 2026

On Wednesdays, We Ask Questions: Optimizing "Active Listening" in Automated Legal Triage and Referral

Quinten Steenhuis, Jacqueline Harvey

The paper evaluates an automated legal triage system (FETCH) that uses follow-up questions, demonstrating that while low-cost LLMs are effective for classification, generating high-quality questions r…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Trends in AI and Human-AI Interaction in Clinical Trials -- A Hybrid Human-AI Exploration

Sandra Woolley, Tim Collins, Khalid Khattak, Illia Chernomorets +2 more

This study analyzes ClinicalTrials.gov records to track the rising trend of AI in clinical trials and demonstrates that a hybrid human-AI screening approach is viable but requires clearer reporting of…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

When Does Persona Prompting Actually Help? A Retrieval and Metric Analysis of Expert Role Injection in LLMs

Shuai Xiao, Su Liu, Weikai Zhou, Jialun Wu +3 more

Persona prompting does not universally improve LLM performance; instead, it systematically trades increased expertise depth for reduced clarity, making multi-metric evaluation essential.

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Generative AI and Digital Ecosystem Resilience: A Proactive Lifecycle-Based Survey

Jonghyun Chung, Rishabh Chaddha, Sanket Badhe, Debanshu Das +2 more

This survey proposes a proactive, lifecycle-based framework, utilizing the C5 Interaction Model, to detect emerging adversarial synthetic narratives generated by GenAI, moving beyond traditional react…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Generative AI and Digital Ecosystem Resilience: A Proactive Lifecycle-Based Survey

Jonghyun Chung, Rishabh Chaddha, Sanket Badhe, Debanshu Das +2 more

This survey proposes a proactive, lifecycle-based framework, utilizing the C5 Interaction Model, to detect emerging adversarial synthetic narratives generated by Generative AI, moving beyond tradition…

View →
cs.CRcs.HCRecentJun 2, 2026

Generative AI-Enabled Refund Fraud in Chinese E-Commerce: Investigation on Merchants and Platform Workers

Shuning Zhang, Eve He, Xiao Zhan, Shijing He +3 more

This paper investigates how Generative AI enables scalable, hyper-realistic fraud in Chinese e-commerce by fabricating product defect evidence, proposing new defense mechanisms like verifiable materia…

View →
cs.DCcs.AIcs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Compliance-Scored Best-of-N Guardrail Orchestration for Multimodal Document Generation in Payments Dispute Defense

Nataraj Agaram Sundar, Tejas Morabia

The paper introduces a novel guardrail orchestration layer that improves the compliance and efficiency of high-stakes multimodal document generation by scoring multiple generated candidates against we…

View →
cs.AIcs.ARRecentMay 31, 2026

Can AI Review Improve Paper Drafting? An Empirical Study on 20 Computer Architecture Submissions

Di Wu

The paper empirically investigates whether AI-generated reviews can improve the drafting process of academic papers, finding that AI reviews cover many human-identified issues but also introduce novel…

View →
cs.AIcs.SIRecentMay 27, 2026

CyberJurors: A Multi-Agent Simulation Task for E-Commerce Disputes Verdict

Yanhui Sun, Wu Liu, Haifeng Ming, Xinru Wang +2 more

The paper introduces CyberJurors, a multi-agent framework and the VerdictBench benchmark to simulate and solve complex e-commerce dispute verdicts by modeling the reasoning and consensus process of cr…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentMar 19, 2026

Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections

Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan

This paper reviews recent EU AI regulatory documents to clarify definitions and synthesize current provisions regarding security, privacy, and autonomous agentic AI.

View →