ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.31275· 20 results

cs.HCcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

The Decision to Verify: How Warmth and User Characteristics Shape Reliance on Conversational Agents for Information Search

Mert Yazan, Frederik Bungaran Ishak Situmeang, Suzan Verberne

Despite having access to web search, users' reliance on conversational AI for information remains high, driven primarily by pre-existing trust and influenced indirectly by the chatbot's conversational…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.HCRecentMay 27, 2026

AI, Take the Wheel: What Drives Delegation and Trust in Human-Computer Cooperative Question Answering?

Maharshi Gor, Yoo Yeon Sung, Yu Hou, Eve Fleisig +3 more

This study investigates human-AI collaboration in question answering, finding that while collaboration is beneficial, humans make suboptimal decisions by both under-relying on correct AI suggestions a…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Persona Conditioning of Brand Recommendations in Retrieval-Augmented Commercial Chat: A Prominence-Stratified Cross-Provider Audit

Will Jack, Noah Lehman, Keller Maloney, Sarah Xu

The study demonstrates that conditioning AI brand recommendations on a user's persona significantly alters the recommended product set, particularly for mid-market brands, and this effect is largest o…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

Context-Aware Spear Phishing: Generative AI-Enabled Attacks Against Individuals via Public Social Media Data

Elham Pourabbas Vafa, Sayak Saha Roy, Shirin Nilizadeh

The paper demonstrates that generative AI can automate and scale highly personalized, context-aware spear-phishing attacks using only public social media data, resulting in messages that are significa…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

When Does Persona Prompting Actually Help? A Retrieval and Metric Analysis of Expert Role Injection in LLMs

Shuai Xiao, Su Liu, Weikai Zhou, Jialun Wu +3 more

Persona prompting does not universally improve LLM performance; instead, it systematically trades increased expertise depth for reduced clarity, making multi-metric evaluation essential.

View →
cs.CYcs.AIcs.MARecentMay 28, 2026

Dissociative Identity: Language Model Agents Lack Grounding for Reputation Mechanisms

Botao Amber Hu, Helena Rong, Max Van Kleek

The paper argues that traditional identity-based reputation mechanisms are structurally inapplicable to language model agents because their mutable, modular nature makes them ontologically dissociativ…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 30, 2026

From Empathy to Personalized Empathy: Adapting Empathetic Strategies to Individual Users

Wuqiang Zheng, Chengbing Wang, Yilin Yang, Junyi Cheng +5 more

This paper introduces personalized empathy, a capability for LLMs to adapt empathetic strategies based on individual user history, and proposes PereGRM, a reward modeling framework that significantly…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.LGRecentJun 2, 2026

Covert Influence Between Language Models

Avidan Shah, Jay Chooi, Jinghua Ou, Shi Feng

This paper characterizes the risk of covert influence—where a sender's hidden behavioral payload transfers to a receiver through undetectable carriers—across three common LLM interfaces, demonstrating…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Appropriateness of Empathy in AI: A Signal-Cost Perspective

Chi-Ching Juan, Tao Wang, Harold Lee

This paper proposes a Signal Cost Proxy framework, drawing from signaling theory, to systematically evaluate the contextual appropriateness of empathy in AI interactions.

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Beyond Isolated Behaviors: Hierarchical User Modeling for LLM Personalization

Liang Wang, Xinyi Mou, Xiaoyou Liu, Tiannan Wang +2 more

The paper proposes a hierarchical framework, PHF (Practice-Habitus-Field), inspired by Bourdieu's Theory of Practice, to improve LLM personalization by modeling user behaviors at three distinct levels…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.CYRecentApr 4, 2026

Negotiating Privacy with Smart Voice Assistants: Risk-Benefit and Control-Acceptance Tensions

Molly Campbell, Mohamad Sheikho Al Jasem, Ajay Kumar Shrestha

This study proposes a negotiation framework, using composite indices (RBTI and CATI), to explain how youth navigate competing privacy pressures when using smart voice assistants, finding that high usa…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Human-like in-group bias in instruction-tuned language model agents

Messi H. J. Lee

This study demonstrates that instruction-tuned language model agents exhibit robust, group-contingent in-group bias, structurally mimicking human social biases, even when standard action logs fail to…

View →
cs.HCcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

When Are LLM Inferences Acceptable? User Reactions and Control Preferences for Inferred Personal Information

Kyzyl Monteiro, Minjung Park, Alexander Ioffrida, Angelina Sanna +5 more

This study investigated user reactions to inferred personal information from their own ChatGPT histories, finding that acceptability is governed by context-sensitive norms regarding generation, retent…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.CYRecentMay 17, 2026

AI Agents May Always Fall for Prompt Injections

Sahar Abdelnabi, Eugene Bagdasarian

The paper argues that prompt injection is a fundamental vulnerability in AI agents, proposing that Contextual Integrity (CI) offers a principled framework to understand and mitigate context-sensitive…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Teaching Values to Machines: Simulating Human-Like Behavior in LLMs

Asaf Yehudai, Naama Rozen, Ariel Gera

The paper successfully demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) can be induced to adopt coherent, human-like value structures, showing strong alignment with human psychological patterns.

View →
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 19, 2026

What Security and Privacy Transparency Users Need from Consumer-Facing Generative AI

Jiaxun Cao, Yu Dong, Chunxi Zhan, Rithvik Neti +2 more

The paper investigates how users perceive and utilize security and privacy transparency in consumer-facing generative AI, finding that users rely on proxies like popularity and require actionable, tru…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation

Yilun Qiu, Xiaoyan Zhao, Yang Zhang, Yuxin Chen +6 more

The paper introduces PARL, a framework that learns personalized evaluation rubrics directly from raw user interaction histories to accurately assess how well LLM outputs align with subjective, user-sp…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

TUX: Measuring Human--AI Tacit Understanding

Yueshen Li, Hanyi Min, Vedant Das Swain, Koustuv Saha

The paper introduces the Tacit Understanding Index (TUX) to measure non-explicit alignment between humans and LLMs, finding that this alignment is significantly structured by individual person-level t…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Same Evidence, Different Answers: Canonical-Context On-Policy Distillation for Multi-Turn Language Models

Zizhuo Lin, Quanling Liu, Jinsheng Quan, Chao Zhang +5 more

The paper introduces Canonical-Context On-Policy Distillation (CCOPD) to improve multi-turn language model performance by mitigating 'self-anchored drift,' ensuring consistent answers regardless of wh…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Adaptive Interviewing for Persona Simulation in LLMs: Evidence-Grounded Reasoning Improves Decision Alignment

Ruoxi Su, Yuhan Liu, Jingyu Hu

The paper introduces an adaptive interview framework to gather rich persona context, demonstrating that LLMs improve decision alignment in moral dilemmas only when they selectively ground their decisi…

View →