ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2606.04460v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 11, 2026

ExploitGym: Can AI Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks?

Zhun Wang, Nico Schiller, Hongwei Li, Srijiith Sesha Narayana +12 more

The paper introduces ExploitGym, a large-scale benchmark, demonstrating that advanced AI agents can successfully turn theoretical software vulnerabilities into working exploits, highlighting growing c…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 13, 2026

ExploitBench: A Capability Ladder Benchmark for LLM Cybersecurity Agents

Seunghyun Lee, David Brumley

The paper introduces ExploitBench, a capability-graded benchmark that measures the progressive stages of exploitation, demonstrating that while current frontier models can easily trigger bugs, achievi…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 26, 2026

Lessons from Penetration Tests on Large-Scale Agent Systems

Kevin Eykholt, Dhilung Kirat, Xiaokui Shu, Jiyong Jang +2 more

The paper reports on penetration tests conducted on proprietary, large-scale AI agent systems, finding that security vulnerabilities persist despite stricter development standards.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMar 30, 2026

Design Principles for the Construction of a Benchmark Evaluating Security Operation Capabilities of Multi-agent AI Systems

Yicheng Cai, Mitchell John DeStefano, Guodong Dong, Pulkit Handa +4 more

This paper proposes a set of design principles and a conceptual benchmark (SOC-bench) to systematically evaluate the blue team operational capabilities of multi-agent AI systems in autonomous Security…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 21, 2026

Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps

Alankrit Chona, Igor Kozlov, Ambuj Kumar

The paper introduces a challenging benchmark for LLM agents to perform unsupervised threat hunting on raw Windows event logs, finding that current frontier models perform poorly and are not ready for…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 11, 2026

Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store

Roxana Geambasu, Mariana Raykova, Pierre Tholoniat, Trishita Tiwari +2 more

The paper argues that current 'on-the-fly' AI agent design lacks necessary software engineering rigor and proposes an 'AI Workflow Store' to provide hardened, reusable, and reliable agent workflows.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 16, 2026

STRIDE-AI: A Threat Modeling Framework for Generative AI Security Assessment

Tsafac Nkombong Regine Cyrille, Franziska Schwarz

The paper introduces STRIDE-AI, a novel threat modeling framework that adapts classical STRIDE for generative AI, successfully reducing the attack success rate of a tested LLM chatbot from 80% to 15%.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 20, 2026

TitanCA: Lessons from Orchestrating LLM Agents to Discover 100+ CVEs

Ting Zhang, Yikun Li, Chengran Yang, Ratnadira Widyasari +14 more

TitanCA presents a novel, multi-agent LLM orchestration framework that significantly improves vulnerability discovery by reducing false positives and identifying numerous zero-day vulnerabilities.

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 19, 2026

Hunting Vulnerability Variants in AI Infra: Measurement and Reference-Driven Detection

Tian Dong, Yanjun Chen, Shoufeng Zhang, Huaien Zhang +5 more

This paper measures the prevalence of recurring vulnerability patterns (variants) across multiple AI infrastructure repositories and proposes INFRASCOPE, a framework to automatically detect these vari…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-World

Pedro Conde, Henrique Branquinho, Valerio Mazzone, Bruno Mendes +2 more

The paper introduces a novel, practical evaluation protocol that shifts the assessment of AI pentesting agents from simple task completion to validated, open-ended vulnerability discovery in complex,…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 29, 2026

Autonomous LLM Agents & CTFs: A Second Look

Youness Bouchari, Matteo Boffa, Marco Mellia, Idilio Drago +2 more

The paper re-evaluates LLM agents on CTFs, finding that while general-purpose agents like claude-code are strong baselines, specialized, modular architectures significantly improve performance and con…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 27, 2026

Dynamic Cyber Ranges

Víctor Mayoral-Vilches, María Sanz-Gómez, Francesco Balassone, Maite Del Mundo De Torres +5 more

The paper proposes Dynamic Cyber Ranges, an advanced cyber range environment using LLM-driven Defender agents to counter the saturation of traditional security benchmarks, demonstrating that these dyn…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 3, 2026

A Systematic Security Evaluation of OpenClaw and Its Variants

Yuhang Wang, Haichang Gao, Zhenxing Niu, Zhaoxiang Liu +3 more

The paper systematically evaluates six OpenClaw-series AI agent frameworks, demonstrating that these agentized systems possess significant security vulnerabilities that are distinct from and more seve…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 21, 2026

Security Is Relative: Training-Free Vulnerability Detection via Multi-Agent Behavioral Contract Synthesis

Yongchao Wang, Zhiqiu Huang

The paper introduces Phoenix, a training-free multi-agent framework that detects code vulnerabilities by synthesizing project-specific behavioral contracts, significantly outperforming existing method…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentMay 25, 2026

CyberEvolver: Structured Self-Evolution for Cybersecurity Agents On the Fly

Yihe Fan, Changyi Li, Lichen Xu, Xudong Pan +3 more

The paper introduces CyberEvolver, a self-evolving agent framework that iteratively revises its own operational scaffold based on failed execution attempts, significantly improving cybersecurity agent…

View →
cs.AIcs.CRRecentMay 12, 2026

Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack

Hao Wang, Hanchen Li, Qiuyang Mang, Alvin Cheung +2 more

The paper introduces BenchJack, an automated red-teaming system that systematically audits popular AI agent benchmarks, revealing numerous reward-hacking exploits and demonstrating a method to signifi…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGcs.SERecentApr 23, 2026

Strategic Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Architecture for Cost-Effective Code Vulnerability Detection

Zhaohui Geoffrey Wang

The paper proposes a novel '3+1' heterogeneous multi-agent architecture using cloud LLMs and a local verifier to achieve high-accuracy, cost-effective code vulnerability detection, significantly outpe…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 9, 2026

ACIArena: Toward Unified Evaluation for Agent Cascading Injection

Hengyu An, Minxi Li, Jinghuai Zhang, Naen Xu +5 more

The paper introduces ACIArena, a unified and comprehensive evaluation framework designed to systematically test the robustness of Multi-Agent Systems against complex Agent Cascading Injection attacks.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentMay 21, 2026

Benchmarking Autonomous Agents against Temporal, Spatial, and Semantic Evasions

Jianan Ma, Xiaohu Du, Ruixiao Lin, Yaoxiang Bian +7 more

The paper introduces a multi-dimensional evasion framework and a new benchmark (A3S-Bench) to test autonomous agents, demonstrating that stateful, multi-turn attacks significantly increase system risk…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 28, 2026

Red-MIRROR: Agentic LLM-based Autonomous Penetration Testing with Reflective Verification and Knowledge-augmented Interaction

Tran Vy Khang, Nguyen Dang Nguyen Khang, Nghi Hoang Khoa, Do Thi Thu Hien +2 more

Red-MIRROR is a novel multi-agent LLM system that automates complex web penetration testing by integrating a memory-reflection backbone, achieving superior performance on industry benchmarks.

View →