ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “LLMs”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

stat.OTcs.AIEmpiricalRecentJun 9, 2026

Flaws in the LLM Automation Narrative

George Perrett, Javae Elliott, Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott

This paper evaluates the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) in a high-stakes context by comparing it to human experts and measuring variance and error magnitude.

View →
cs.AIcs.IRRecentMay 27, 2026

From Learning Resources to Competencies: LLM-Based Tagging with Evidence and Graph Constraints

Ngoc Luyen Le, Marie-Hélène Abel, Bertrand Laforge

The paper introduces an LLM-based pipeline that tags learning resources with structured competencies, achieving strong performance while providing traceable evidence and leveraging graph constraints.

View →
cs.CYcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

Beyond Access: Guided LLM Scaffolding for Independent Learning in Undergraduate Statistics

Mohammad Amanlou, Yasaman Amou-Jafari, Mehrad Livian, Fatemeh Boloukazari +2 more

This study compares different levels of LLM access in a statistics course, finding that structured, guided use significantly improves students' reasoning skills and independent learning compared to un…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM Training

Yalun Dai, Yangyu Huang, Tongshen Yang, Yonghan Wang +7 more

This paper proposes four guidelines and two novel data ordering methods (STR and SAW) to systematically optimize data organization, significantly enhancing the stability and performance of LLM trainin…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law

Sebastian Nagl, Ann-Kristin Mayrhofer, Martin Heidebach, Aleyna Koçak +5 more

The paper introduces BenGER, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs on German legal reasoning, demonstrating that closed-flagship models perform best and that human-AI co-creation significantly…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Multi-Legal-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Legal Reasoning Across Jurisdictions, Languages, and Legal Traditions

Volodymyr Ovcharov

The paper introduces Multi-Legal-Bench, a novel cross-jurisdictional benchmark evaluating LLMs on five standardized legal reasoning tasks across six diverse countries, demonstrating that cross-lingual…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

Which Institutional Frameworks Do Chatbots Assume? Auditing Jurisdictional Defaults in Multilingual LLMs

Zhizhi Wang, Harini Suresh

This study finds that when users do not specify a jurisdiction, the language used in the prompt strongly biases the LLM's response toward a specific national legal framework (U.S. for English, China f…

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

LLMs Without Deep Neural Networks: New Architecture, Benefits and Case Study

Vincent Granville

The paper introduces a novel, non-deep neural network architecture that achieves the performance of LLMs by finding the global optimum of the loss function in a single, closed-form iteration, eliminat…

View →
cs.CLRecentJun 1, 2026

Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Long-Form Output Evaluation

Junjie Chen, Yuxi Dong, Haitao Li, Weihang Su +4 more

The paper introduces LongJudgeBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the reliability of LLM judges specifically for complex, long-form output evaluation, revealing significant instability gaps in…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 2, 2026

Combating Data Laundering in LLM Training

Muxing Li, Zesheng Ye, Sharon Li, Feng Liu

The paper introduces Synthesis Data Reversion (SDR), a method that infers the data laundering transformation used in LLM training and synthesizes queries to restore the detection signals lost when pro…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Forensic Implications of Localized AI: Artifact Analysis of Ollama, LM Studio, and llama.cpp

Shariq Murtuza

This paper systematically analyzes the forensic artifacts left by popular local LLM runners (Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp) on Windows and Linux, providing a foundational corpus of evidence for digital…

View →
cs.CRcs.CLcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Implicit Identity Technologies for LLMs: Fingerprinting and Watermarking across Datasets, Models, and Generated Content

Bing Liu, Shunping Wang, Yufan Zhu, Xinyi Yu +4 more

This paper introduces 'implicit identity' as a unifying framework to survey and categorize LLM fingerprinting and watermarking techniques for verifying ownership and provenance across datasets, models…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCRecentMay 29, 2026

Effects of Varying LLM Access on Essay Writing Behavior

Julia Christenson, Karin de Langis, Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Dongyeop Kang

The study found that constraining LLM access, rather than banning it, can preserve students' sense of authorship and encourage more strategic writing behaviors while still providing scaffolding benefi…

View →
cs.CLRecentMay 31, 2026

Benchmarking Local LLMs for Natural-Language-to-SQL Querying in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing: An Empirical Benchmark on Consumer-Grade Hardware

Sagar Bhetwal, Rajan Bastakoti, Nirajan Acharya, Gaurav Kumar Gupta

This study benchmarks four local LLMs for natural-language-to-SQL querying in biopharma manufacturing, finding that general-purpose code-tuned models like Llama 3.1 8B and Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B outperform…

View →
cs.AIcs.MARecentMay 27, 2026

Review Arcade: On the Human Alignment and Gameability of LLM Reviews

Hans Ole Hatzel, Sebastian Steindl, Jan Strich

This paper empirically evaluates LLM-generated reviews for academic papers, finding that while LLM reviews show some alignment with human ones, authors can effectively 'game' the system using iterativ…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Doing What They Say, Not What They Reason: Locating the Faithfulness Gap in LLM Agents

Yufeng Wang

This paper investigates the 'faithfulness gap' in LLM agents—the discrepancy between stated reasoning and actual action—by decomposing it into two opposing steps: reasoning-to-conclusion and conclusio…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentApr 5, 2026

LLM-Enabled Open-Source Systems in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in GitHub Security Advisories

Fariha Tanjim Shifat, Hariswar Baburaj, Ce Zhou, Jaydeb Sarker +1 more

The paper analyzes GitHub security advisories for LLM-integrated open-source systems, finding that while most vulnerabilities map to existing code-level weaknesses, the architectural risks like Supply…

View →
cs.LOcs.CLcs.CRRecentMay 13, 2026

Proof-Carrying Certificates for LLM Pipelines: A Trust-Boundary Architecture

George Koomullil

The paper proposes a trust-boundary architecture using Lean 4 to verify the deterministic structured computations surrounding LLM pipelines, providing verifiable certificates for high-stakes deploymen…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

LLM-FACETS: A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Evaluating LLM Transparency and Accountability

Tom Lucas, Alessio Buscemi, Alfredo Capozucca, German Castignani +1 more

LLM-FACETS introduces an open-source, privacy-preserving framework designed to enable non-technical domain experts and compliance officers to audit and evaluate the transparency and accountability of…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

Double-Edged Sword or Sharp Tool? Designing and Evaluating Triadic LLM-Teacher Collaboration for K-12 Writing at Scale

Canran Wang, Yuwen Yang, Zhen Wang, Ming Ma +4 more

The paper designs and evaluates a triadic LLM-Teacher collaboration system for K-12 writing, finding that strategic labor division between the LLM and teacher effectively improves writing quality but…

View →