ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

20 results for “policy update”

CS papers only

Hybrid search: Keyword + semantic, ranked by combined score.ⓘ

Want pure semantic search? Try claim verification →

cs.CLRecentMay 29, 2026

The Flip Side of RLHF: On-Policy Feedback for Reward Model Self-Supervised Improvement

Xiaobo Wang, Tong Wu, Min Tang, Jiaqi Li +2 more

The paper introduces SAVE, a framework that uses on-policy feedback and the value function to self-supervise and improve reward models, significantly enhancing RLHF performance across multiple benchma…

View →
stat.MLcs.LGTheoreticalRecentJul 3, 2026

A Hierarchy of Policy Learning Problems

Hamsa Bastani, Osbert Bastani, Shihan Chen

This paper provides a mathematical framework for studying different policy learning problems and shows reductions between them.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 14, 2026

Policy-Invisible Violations in LLM-Based Agents

Jie Wu, Ming Gong

The paper introduces the concept of policy-invisible violations in LLM agents and proposes Sentinel, a counterfactual graph simulation framework, which significantly improves policy enforcement accura…

View →
cs.MAEmpiricalRecentJul 3, 2026

Second MOASEI Competition at AAMAS'2026: A Technical Report

Ceferino Patino, Tyler J. Billings, Alireza Saleh Abadi, Daniel Redder +3 more

The paper describes the 2026 MOASEI Competition, which evaluates multi-agent decision-making under open-system conditions in wildfire fighting, cybersecurity, and ride-sharing domains.

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Diagnosing Live Within-Policy Instruction Conflicts in LLM Agents with Witnessed Resolution Profiles

Lu Yan, Xuan Chen, Xiangyu Zhang

The paper introduces WIRE, a pipeline for diagnosing live intra-policy rule conflicts in LLM agents by identifying and testing specific rule pairs within a single prompt policy that can co-govern a re…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 17, 2026

PolicyGapper: Automated Detection of Inconsistencies Between Google Play Data Safety Sections and Privacy Policies Using LLMs

Luca Ferrari, Billel Habbati, Meriem Guerar, Mariano Ceccato +1 more

PolicyGapper is an LLM-based tool that automatically detects inconsistencies and omissions between a mobile app's Google Play Data Safety Section and its official Privacy Policy, identifying thousands…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLEmpiricalRecentJun 28, 2026

PolicyGuard: A Dialogue-Grounded Sub-Agent Verifier for Policy Adherence in LLM Agents

Seongjae Kang, Taehyung Yu, Sung Ju Hwang

The paper introduces POLICYGUARD, a sub-agent verifier that ensures policy adherence in LLM agents by providing actionable feedback for the next turn based on full conversation context and self-reason…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLEmpiricalRecentJun 18, 2026

LedgerAgent: Structured State for Policy-Adherent Tool-Calling Agents

Md Nayem Uddin, Amir Saeidi, Eduardo Blanco, Chitta Baral

The paper introduces LedgerAgent, an inference-time method for tool-calling agents that maintains observed task states in a separate ledger and checks state-dependent policy constraints before tool ca…

View →
cs.LGcs.AITheoreticalRecentJul 1, 2026

Staleness-Learning Rate Scaling Laws for Asynchronous RLHF

Jingwei Song, Haofeng Xu, Jie Xiao, Chengke Bao +7 more

This paper analyzes the effect of using stale rollouts in asynchronous GRPO and derives a stability condition.

View →
cs.LGcs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

Smaller Models are Natural Explorers for Policy-Level Diversity in GRPO

Yiming Ren, Yiran Xu, Zicheng Lin, Chufan Shi +7 more

The paper proposes S2L-PO, a framework that uses smaller, naturally diverse models as structured explorers to enhance the policy-level diversity and performance of larger language models during traini…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 8, 2026

An Automated Framework for Cybersecurity Policy Compliance Assessment Against Security Control Standards

Bikash Saha, Sandeep Kumar Shukla

The paper introduces PROPARAG, an automated framework that autonomously assesses how well organizational cybersecurity policies comply with standard security controls, achieving high F1 scores on real…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 1, 2026

Multi-Agent LLM Governance for Safe Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning in SDN-IoT Defense

Saeid Jamshidi, Negar Shahabi, Foutse Khomh, Carol Fung +1 more

The paper proposes a two-timescale governance framework using a multi-agent LLM to safely update and guide RL agents for SDN-IoT defense, significantly improving performance and stability under advers…

View →
stat.MLcs.LGTheoreticalRecentJul 19, 2026

Non-Asymptotic Best Policy Identification Guarantees in Online Reinforcement Learning

Joseph Lazzaro, Alessio Russo, Aldo Pacchiano

This paper provides non-asytotic sample complexity guarantees for the Navigate and Stop algorithm in online tabular Reinforcement Learning, identifying additional attributes that affect the overall sa…

View →
cs.CRRecentMay 2, 2026

Ghost in the Context: Measuring Policy-Carriage Failures in Decision-Time Assembly

Igor Santos-Grueiro

The paper identifies and measures a critical failure mode where LLM agents violate policies by losing or corrupting directive-bearing state during the process of assembling the decision context, and p…

View →
stat.MLcs.LGmath.PRTheoreticalRecentJun 16, 2026

A Diffusion Approximation for Temporal-Difference Learning with Linear Features under Markovian Noise

M. Forzo, E. Monzio Compagnoni, A. Russo, A. Pacchiano

This paper introduces a stochastic differential equation approximation for linear Temporal Difference (TD) learning under Markovian noise, explaining the constant-stepsize error floor.

View →
cs.LGcs.IRstat.METheoreticalRecentJul 16, 2026

Accelerating A/B-Tests with Counterfactual Estimation: Reducing Variance through Policy Overlap

Olivier Jeunen

Proposed a novel experimental protocol for online controlled experiments to reduce variance and improve statistical power by exploiting policy overlap and using $Δ$-Off-Policy Estimation methods.

View →
cs.HCEmpiricalRecentJul 3, 2026

Regulating AI: Where U.S. State Policy and HCI (Mis)align

Nino Migineishvili, Alice Gao, Adinawa Adjagbodjou, Dhanaraj Thakur +2 more

This paper analyzes 18 state-level AI committee reports to understand how policymakers discuss AI benefits and risks, comparing them to established taxonomy and HCI scholars' concerns.

View →