ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2604.15375v1· 20 results

cs.CRcs.PLcs.SERecentApr 28, 2026

Symbolic Execution Meets Multi-LLM Orchestration: Detecting Memory Vulnerabilities in Incomplete Rust CVE Snippets

Zeyad Abdelrazek, Young Lee

The paper introduces a novel multi-LLM orchestration system combined with symbolic execution to successfully detect memory vulnerabilities in uncompilable, incomplete Rust CVE code snippets, achieving…

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 2, 2026

Assertain: Automated Security Assertion Generation Using Large Language Models

Shams Tarek, Dipayan Saha, Khan Thamid Hasan, Sujan Kumar Saha +2 more

Assertain is an automated framework that uses large language models and design analysis to generate high-quality, executable security assertions for hardware designs, significantly outperforming state…

View →
cs.CRcs.ARRecentApr 29, 2026

SafeTune: Mitigating Data Poisoning in LLM Fine-Tuning for RTL Code Generation

Mahshid Rezakhani, Nowfel Mashnoor, Kimia Azar, Hadi Kamali

SafeTune is a framework that enhances the robustness of LLMs fine-tuned for RTL code generation by detecting and mitigating data poisoning attacks, particularly those aiming to insert hardware Trojans…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LGRecentMay 22, 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Generated Code Security Across Prompting Methods

Mohammed Kharma, Ahmed Sabbah, Mohammad Alkhanafseh, Mohammad Hammoudeh +1 more

The paper empirically evaluates the security quality of LLM-generated code across various prompting methods, finding that while prompting alters the structure of weaknesses, it is insufficient to reli…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIcs.SERecentApr 7, 2026

Broken by Default: A Formal Verification Study of Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code

Dominik Blain, Maxime Noiseux

This study formally verified 3,500 AI-generated code artifacts and found that a majority (55.8%) contain exploitable security vulnerabilities, regardless of the LLM used.

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 14, 2026

LogicEval: A Systematic Framework for Evaluating Automated Repair Techniques for Logical Vulnerabilities in Real-World Software

Syed Md Mukit Rashid, Abdullah Al Ishtiaq, Kai Tu, Yilu Dong +6 more

The paper introduces LogicEval, a systematic framework and dataset (LogicDS) to evaluate automated repair techniques for logical software vulnerabilities, finding that prompt sensitivity and context l…

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 14, 2026

Veritas: A Semantically Grounded Agentic Framework for Memory Corruption Vulnerability Detection in Binaries

Xinran Zheng, Alfredo Pesoli, Marco Valleri, Suman Jana +1 more

Veritas is a semantically grounded framework that detects memory corruption vulnerabilities in stripped binaries by combining static analysis, LLM-based reasoning, and runtime validation, achieving hi…

View →
cs.ARRecentMay 27, 2026

FT-Pilot: Automated Fault-Tolerant RTL Rewriting via Vulnerability-Guided LLMs

Weixing Liu, Zizhen Liu, Jing Ye, Naixing Wang +3 more

FT-Pilot is a novel GNN-guided LLM framework that automatically rewrites RTL code to harden digital circuits against soft errors, providing an efficient, automated path for reliability optimization.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 27, 2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Yujie Ma, Jialin Rong, Chenxi Yang, Lili Quan +3 more

The paper addresses the gap in understanding real-world LLM-in-the-loop vulnerabilities by creating the LLMCVE dataset and demonstrating that these vulnerabilities are significantly harder to repair t…

View →
cs.CRcs.LGRecentMay 28, 2026

Dissecting the Black Box: Circuit-Level Analysis of LLM Vulnerability Detection

Syafiq Al Atiiq, Chun Zhou, Christian Gehrmann

The paper analyzes LLM vulnerability detection using mechanistic interpretability, finding that models primarily rely on safety detectors rather than direct vulnerability signature recognition.

View →
cs.SEcs.CRRecentMay 11, 2026

AutoSOUP: Safety-Oriented Unit Proof Generation for Component-level Memory-Safety Verification

Paschal C. Amusuo, Ricardo Calvo, Dharun Anandayuvaraj, Taylor Le Lievre +4 more

AutoSOUP is a system that automates component-level memory-safety verification by generating Safety-Oriented Unit Proofs, leveraging a hybrid LLM-based architecture to overcome manual workflow limitat…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 25, 2026

Bridging Code Property Graphs and Language Models for Program Analysis

Ahmed Lekssays

The paper introduces codebadger, a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates Joern's Code Property Graph (CPG) with LLMs, enabling large language models to perform large-scale, semantic prog…

View →
cs.CRcs.ARcs.LGRecentMay 11, 2026

LLMs for Secure Hardware Design and Related Problems: Opportunities and Challenges

Johann Knechtel, Ozgur Sinanoglu, Ramesh Karri

This review analyzes the dual impact of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into hardware design, detailing both their transformative potential in EDA and the critical security vulnerabilities th…

View →
cs.CRRecentMar 30, 2026

VulnScout-C: A Lightweight Transformer for C Code Vulnerability Detection

Aymen Lassoued, Nacef Mbarek, Bechir Dardouri, Bassem Ouni +2 more

The paper introduces VULNSCOUT-C, a compact, specialized transformer model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in C code vulnerability detection while maintaining low inference cost, making it…

View →
cs.CRcs.SERecentMar 31, 2026

When Labels Are Scarce: A Systematic Mapping of Label-Efficient Code Vulnerability Detection

Noor Khalal, Chakib Fettal, Lazhar Labiod, Mohamed Nadif

This systematic mapping survey reviews label-efficient approaches for code vulnerability detection, synthesizing five paradigm families and providing a decision guide to navigate trade-offs.

View →
cs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

HarmChip: Evaluating Hardware Security Centric LLM Safety via Jailbreak Benchmarking

Zeng Wang, Minghao Shao, Weimin Fu, Prithwish Basu Roy +5 more

The paper introduces HarmChip, a novel benchmark to evaluate LLM vulnerability to domain-specific hardware security threats, revealing that current safety guardrails fail against semantically disguise…

View →
cs.CRcs.AIRecentApr 1, 2026

Automated Framework to Evaluate and Harden LLM System Instructions against Encoding Attacks

Anubhab Sahu, Diptisha Samanta, Reza Soosahabi

The paper introduces an automated framework demonstrating that LLM system instructions are vulnerable to encoding attacks, where structured output requests can bypass safety refusals and leak sensitiv…

View →
cs.DCcs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Not All Errors Are Equal: A Systematic Study of Error Propagation in Large Language Model Inference

Yafan Huang, Sheng Di, Guanpeng Li

This paper systematically studies how soft errors propagate during Large Language Model (LLM) inference using a novel fault-injection framework, providing critical insights and mitigation strategies f…

View →
cs.CRcs.ARcs.LORecentApr 25, 2026

From Language to Logic: Bridging LLMs & Formal Representations for RTL Assertion Generation

Nowfel Mashnoor, Hadi Kamali, Kimia Azar

The paper introduces ProofLoop, a novel ReAct agent that uses a solver-in-the-loop approach to automatically generate and formally verify SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA) from natural language specifica…

View →
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CRRecentApr 12, 2026

Verify Before You Fix: Agentic Execution Grounding for Trustworthy Cross-Language Code Analysis

Jugal Gajjar

The paper introduces an execution-grounded, cross-language framework that significantly improves the reliability of LLM-driven code vulnerability analysis by ensuring that all proposed fixes are confi…

View →