ArXivCSExplorer
☆☆Bookmarks🏆RSSHow to UseFAQ
Built with and by Teycir Ben Soltane•
How to Use•FAQ•GitHub•arXiv.org•
Share:

~ similar to 2605.28487· 19 results

cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

OmniMatBench: A Human-Calibrated Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark Across 19 Materials Science Subfields

Wanhao Liu, Jiaqing Xie, Qian Tan, Weida Wang +9 more

The paper introduces OmniMatBench, a comprehensive, human-calibrated multimodal reasoning benchmark covering 19 materials science subfields, revealing that current multimodal language models (MLLMs) h…

View →
cs.AIcs.CLRecentMay 28, 2026

Rubric-Guided Process Reward for Stepwise Model Routing

Shenghao Ye, Yu Guo, Zhengheng Li, Shuangwu Chen +1 more

The paper proposes RoRo, a rubric-guided process reward framework that improves stepwise model routing by evaluating the quality of intermediate reasoning steps, leading to better performance and cost…

View →
cs.AIcond-mat.mtrl-sciRecentMay 29, 2026

Coupling Language Models with Physics-based Simulation for Synthesis of Inorganic Materials

Edward W. Staley, Tom Arbaugh, Michael Pekala, Alexander New +5 more

The paper proposes a novel hybrid framework that couples Large Language Models (LLMs) with simplified physics-based simulations to improve the synthesis planning of novel inorganic crystalline materia…

View →
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Off-the-Shelf LLMs as Process Scorers: Training-Free Alternative to PRMs for Mathematical Reasoning

Atoosa Chegini, Soheil Feizi

The paper introduces Chunk-Level Guided Generation, a training-free method that uses an off-the-shelf large language model (LLM) as a process scorer to guide small model generation, achieving performa…

View →
cond-mat.mtrl-scics.ETcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Towards Automated Discovery: A Review of Generative Models, Multimodal Learning and Closed-Loop Workflows in Inverse Materials Design

Anand Babu, Rogério Almeida Gouvêa, Gian-Marco Rignanese

This review surveys advanced techniques—including generative models, multimodal learning, and closed-loop workflows—for automated inverse materials design, enabling the targeted discovery of novel cry…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

DeepTool: Scaling Interleaved Deliberation in Tool-Integrated Reasoning via Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning

Yang He, Xiao Ding, Bibo Cai, Yufei Zhang +4 more

DeepTool introduces a novel Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning framework to enhance Tool-Integrated Reasoning by explicitly supervising and rewarding intermediate, interleaved deliberation step…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 29, 2026

MAVEN: Improving Generalization in Agentic Tool Calling

Omkar Ghugarkar, Vishvesh Bhat, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Asad Aali

The paper introduces MAVEN, a lightweight symbolic reasoning scaffold that significantly improves the generalization and end-to-end success rate of large language models in complex, multi-step tool-ca…

View →
cs.CERecentJun 1, 2026

Matter to Mechanism: A Benchmark for AI Co-Scientists in Materials and Battery Research

Shashwat Sourav, Tanjin. He, Maria K. Y. Chan, Anubhav Jain +1 more

The paper introduces 'Matter to Mechanism,' a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate AI co-scientists' ability to generate plausible, mechanism-grounded solution hypotheses for complex materi…

View →
cs.HCcs.AIRecentMay 31, 2026

pcbGPT: Automatic PCB Schematic Synthesis from Natural Language Requirements

Tobias King, Steven Kehrberg, Michael Beigl, Tobias Röddiger

pcbGPT is a grounded system that automatically generates editable KiCad PCB schematics from natural language requirements, achieving high accuracy on complex embedded design tasks.

View →
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CRRecentApr 18, 2026

The Cognitive Penalty: Ablating System 1 and System 2 Reasoning in Edge-Native SLMs for Decentralized Consensus

Syed Muhammad Aqdas Rizvi

The paper demonstrates that for edge-native SLMs used in decentralized governance, simpler, intuitive reasoning (System 1) is significantly more robust and efficient than complex, iterative deliberati…

View →
cs.AIRecentJun 1, 2026

Token Predictors Are Not Planners: Building Physically Grounded Causal Reasoners

Zheng Lu, Mingqi Gao, Qinlei Xie, Wanqi Zhong +7 more

The paper argues that current embodied planning benchmarks prioritize superficial language prediction over true physical reasoning, introducing new benchmarks and a large-scale dataset to demonstrate…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

Beyond Consensus: Trace-Level Synthesis in Mixture of Agents

Shreyas Fadnavis, Praitayini Kanakaraj, Felix Wyss

The paper proposes using an LLM aggregator that analyzes complete reasoning traces, demonstrating that trace-level synthesis is superior to traditional consensus methods like majority voting for solvi…

View →
cs.AIcs.LGRecentJun 1, 2026

Extreme Low-Bit Inference in Reasoning Models: Failure Modes and Targeted Recovery

Ekaterina Alimaskina, Darya Rudas, Denis Shveykin, Gleb Molodtsov +2 more

The paper analyzes the failure modes of aggressive 2-bit quantization in large reasoning models, proposing lightweight controls like FP16 planning and loop rescue to restore accuracy and achieve pract…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

ForeSci: Evaluating LLM Agents for Forward-Looking AI Research Judgment

Qiuyu Tian, Zequn Liu, Yingce Xia, Haojie Yin +1 more

The paper introduces ForeSci, a novel benchmark that evaluates LLM agents' ability to make forward-looking research judgments using only historical evidence, finding that explicit evidence organizatio…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

DREAM-R: Multimodal Speculative Reasoning with RL-Based Refined Drafting, Precise Verification, and Fully Parallel Execution

Yunhai Hu, Zining Liu, Xiangyang Yin, Tianhua Xia +4 more

DREAM-R is a novel framework that significantly enhances speculative reasoning in large multimodal models by optimizing draft generation alignment, introducing a robust verification mechanism, and ena…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 27, 2026

A Matter of TASTE: Improving Coverage and Difficulty of Agent Benchmarks

Tomer Keren, Nitay Calderon, Asaf Yehudai, Yotam Perlitz +2 more

The paper introduces TASTE, an automatic task synthesis method that generates challenging agent benchmarks by evolving tool sequences, demonstrating that existing benchmarks are saturated and that TAS…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

TRACE: Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements for LLM CoT Evaluation

Yundong Kim, Heyoung Yang

The paper introduces TRACE, a novel metric that evaluates the logical structure of LLM reasoning (CoT) by integrating Toulmin's argumentation theory, demonstrating that sound reasoning structure corre…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 28, 2026

ProjectionBench: Evaluating Scientific Hypothesis Generation in LLMs Under Progressive Information Disclosure

A. J. Lew, Y. Cao, M. J. Buehler

The paper introduces ProjectionBench, a novel benchmark that progressively discloses information to evaluate LLMs' ability to generate scientific hypotheses, demonstrating that advanced models like GP…

View →
cs.AIRecentMay 30, 2026

Efficient Test-time Inference for Generative Planning Models

Robert Gieselmann, Mihai Samson, Federico Pecora, Jeremy L. Wyatt

The paper proposes an efficient inference procedure for generative planning models by modifying the Open-Closed List (OCL) search, achieving superior performance over existing baselines.

View →